Narc said:If they can prove they were raped then I think they should, but if they just want one then no.
Painkiller said:I really don't get why people can't just put him/her up for adoption.
Couldn't agree more with that.Divinitive said:I thought about that perspective as well, but you have to realize that whether you abort the soon to be baby, or put it up for adoption, you will always have to live with the fact that you got rid of it, and you will always have second thoughts of that... I don't think women just go out and get pregnant and say "fuck it I'll just abort it" or at least most women that is, but I feel that if the woman and or male feel that the baby will not be able to be raised in the environment they would currently provide for him or her, then it would be perfectly fine to abort it.
TheHackerHD said:If they can't be responsible when it comes to having sex, then they shouldn't be having sex at all. The woman or couple should be held responsible for there actions. If they really don't feel fit maturity wise or financial wise then they should give the baby up for adoption.
Now if the girl was raped.. I don't blame the girl for wanting to have an abortion. It was a traumatic event and she didn't ask or volunteer to bring the baby into the world. But, I don't think its fair for the baby.. that baby has a soul, spirit.. and it has a destiny. It does not deserve to die, and have its life and future stolen from it. Its got a chance to have a great and successful life just like everyone else does.
A famous quote from the one and only Mewtwo (Pokemon)
-Mewtwo "The circumstances of ones birth are irrelevant. It is what you do with the gift of life that determines who you are."
http://www.forumkorner.com/thread-201231-post-1770992.html#pid1770992 said:There's rarely ever any reliable empirical evidence of rape, purely anecdotal evidence. It's estimated only 3% of supposed rapists will ever spend a day in prison for their crime. It's incredibly slim that they will be capable of proving rape.
http://www.ccainstitute.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=25&Itemid=43 said:No child under three years of age should be placed in institutional care without a parent or primary caregiver, according to research from 32 European countries, including nine in-depth country studies, which considered the “risk of harm in terms of attachment disorder, developmental delay and neural atrophy in the developing brain."
Three years is the average length of time a child in foster care waits to be adopted. Roughly 55% of these children have had three or more placements. An earlier study found that 33% of children had changed elementary schools five or more times, losing relationships and falling behind educationally.
In 2012, 23,396 youth aged out of the U.S. foster care system without the emotional and financial support necessary to succeed. Nearly 40% had been homeless or couch surfed, nearly 60% of young men had been convicted of a crime, and only 48% were employed. 75% of women and 33% of men receive government benefits to meet basic needs. 50% of all youth who aged out were involved in substance use and 17% of the females were pregnant.
Club said:I think abortion should be illegal 99% of the time. There are only a handful of reasonable scenarios where it is the "only option."
Darth Vader said:I don't support abortion if a girl just doesn't want to support a child. The ONLY time i find abortion okay is if the girl was raped/sexually assaulted.
It can be both cases really. Just because they can't or don't want to doesn't mean that its okay to get an abortion at all. Give the child up for adoption.Cann!bal said:It's not that they don't want to, it's that they can't.
Darth Vader said:It can be both cases really. Just because they can't or don't want to doesn't mean that its okay to get an abortion at all. Give the child up for adoption.
Cann!bal said:Blatantly, however, your statement was missing the point. Yeah, because it's irrelevant to the matter honestly. An abortion is a reproductive right. No one should be able to control one's organs, especially not some old devoutly religious white male aristocratic politician. I just spewed various statements regarding the adversity of adoption; I suggest reading them.
Cann!bal said:Blatantly, however, your statement was missing the point. Yeah, because it's irrelevant to the matter honestly. An abortion is a reproductive right. No one should be able to control one's organs, especially not some old devoutly religious white male aristocratic politician. I just spewed various statements regarding the adversity of adoption; I suggest reading them.
Darth Vader said:I respect your statement and I'm not going to argue with it at all. This is a sensitive topic for everyone really. I'm a religious man myself. I don't attend church and the whole 9 yards but I am a firm believer in God and my view on abortion is something I don't see myself changing. But I respect your point of view none the less man.
Club said:Your convoluted sentences are confusing me. Which side are you on here?
Cann!bal said:If you're too insecure to defend your beliefs, then you should probably rethink them critically. Identify the catalyst of your insecurity and transcend it. However, I can tell you now, your insecurity sprouts from the hollow foundation which your beliefs and perspective of Reality reside on. Most people do not see their beliefs, rather their beliefs tell them what to see. Your insecurity to defend yourself is a testament to this.
The walls of your prison are as thick and high as your fear based commitment to sustaining them.
I'm pro-abortion. I simply wanted to manifest you were inaccurate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?