Bail Out System

[Cole]

Now just to be fair, and so the actual ban can be effective to those who actually do deserve to be banned, if someone scams someone and there is full proof that it was that person, then they don't qualify to be bailed out.

To bail someone out you have to pay a certain amount of Koins or $ to Philly. It should take at least 24 hours to process. Philly can then use all the money from these bail outs to improve the forum or to add to his porn collection. Whichever one he prefers.

Just so a member isn't constantly being banned and returning knowing that his buddy is going to bail him out, there should be a limit on how many times you can be bailed out. Maybe something like 1 time a month. After you've been bailed out 3 times, your next ban will be your permanent ban. No exceptions.

I thought this would be a nice addition to the site. Post your thoughts and be sure to cast your vote on this.

 

[Todd Hewitt]

I don't really see any " unfair " bans, so I don't get why we would need to bail somebody out? Just seems like it would make the system unfair and become like the U.S court system anyways.

 

[Cole]

I don't really see any " unfair " bans, so I don't get why we would need to bail somebody out? Just seems like it would make the system unfair and become like the U.S court system anyways.

You have a point there sir.
Just thought of this and felt like posting it.

 

[Hope]

I don't really see any " unfair " bans, so I don't get why we would need to bail somebody out? Just seems like it would make the system unfair and become like the U.S court system anyways.

To this day @Plasma who is a horrible person was still banned wrongly. He scammed offsite and was banned. This is a cool idea in my opinion.

 

[Derp]

Lol US court system and Philly is the judge and...we are the jury?

I don't like the idea. Most people that get banned there is a reason why and with this people would just be trying to break the rules and get a free past all the time by making plans with their buddy to bail them out. Would create a bit of chaos no?

 

[Sector]

No. A ban is a ban.

Phillus makes enough money from @Teen and I to support this site.

 

[JohnnyG]

This is a terrible idea. Abandon thread!!!!111!!

 

[Cole]

No. A ban is a ban.

Phillus make enough money from @Teen and I to support this site.

True. I forgot about you two kids supporting Philly. Welp, there goes my beautiful well thought out suggestion.

 

[Justice]

I don't think it's a good idea. People get banned because they break the rules, if they were wrongly banned then they will get unbanned anyways.

 

[Dunk]

Honestly, i can see a really down fall to this.
Sorry for ripping you on your own thread but this is a bad idea.
Good luck with this being implemented.

 

[JohnnyG]

Thanks for the suggestion, @Cole! We at ForumKorner appreciate and review as many suggestions from our members as we can. Unfortunately, we did not see a need to implement your idea at this point in time. Thank you once again and have a nice day.

 

[Cole]

I only posted this for the hell of it, I can see where you guys are coming from. It could cause chaos and ultimately now I do see it as a bad idea. I mean I'm only going to be on here until April so it doesn't matter to me whether it's implemented or not