Call of Duty Call of Duty: World at War

Evilmaster09

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
264
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
You don't understand what im saying. All of it has been DONE before, unlike mw2 which brought killstreaks to 25.

Theatre mode = Halo
Wager match = Basic concept of mods.
Combat training = Done hundreds of times before, like tf2, playing with bots. The bots just use aimbots, which you can just get from a random hack site.
 

LMCampbell

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
890
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0

So MW2 brought in Killstreaks. Which is basically a move of extra Killstreaks. Whereas In Black Ops Treyarch have brought several extra things to the table. You act like just because they've been modded or used in other games it's a simple copy over. But it isn't it has to be coded and designed, Aspects need to be animated.

They are set to a deadline of around a year and a half which is how to Call of Duty franchise is working, at the moment. So they have to add several things to Call of Duty. Design the Campaign, Upgrade and continue Zombies, Design Multiplayer.
Advertise and Bug test in the space of 1 and a half years.
I dunno about you but thats alot to get done in the space of around a year and a half. Maybe you think differently, but it's not clear cut and easy.
 

Alex H.

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
437
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
The new call of duty is missing something its plain boring now and i just cant think of a reason why but one of them i know its because i liked the 3rd person which they have not added in this version and also the new nazi zombies is impossible.
 

Evilmaster09

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
264
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
It IS a simple copy over - It's ALREADY been coded and designed and its already been animated.

They don't care about bugtesting otherwise they would have released a beta (not the pirated version).
Sure they may have coded it again but they bring nothing new to the table, everything in that game has been done before. Name ONE thing that has never been seen before in the gaming industry that is in black ops.
 

LMCampbell

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
890
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Zombies. Straight off. It's just like the killstreaks it's in the game before in Call of Duty. But has been updated just like The killstreaks were.

But what are you on about with a copy over and already animated. Seriously. You think they just take the code and use it. They couldn't do that, They have to do all the animations. They can't be just copied over and yes their would have been bug tests. It doesn't need to be released to the public for bug tests to be made.
 

LMCampbell

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
890
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Zombies was done before in WaW. Next.
Click to expand...

Killstreaks where done in Cod 4 and WAW ?
Put a solid argument out. Killstreaks had been done.
Zombies added new weapons, new maps. Giving extra to the game.
Basically all that killstreaks did was add on. Like Zombies has with Black ops.
 

LMCampbell

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
890
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
So. "KillStreaks" had been done before by your Logic Zombies completely counts.
As Zombies had never been done within the Pentagon before with the Weapons of Black Ops.
 

Evilmaster09

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
264
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
No, because thats just a map, either way black ops and maybe mw2 bring nothing new. They are both terribly boring.
 

LMCampbell

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
890
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
No, because thats just a map, either way black ops and maybe mw2 bring nothing new. They are both terribly boring.
Click to expand...

But thats the thing with the Call of Duty Franchise.
You couldn't change it dramatically as it would be Call of Duty anymore you can only add to it.

Serious question what would you bring to Call of Duty ?
Without wrecking the game.

and don't present "terribly boring" as fact it's opinion.
It depends if you enjoy it or not. Obviously you don't.
 

Evilmaster09

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
264
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
It IS terribly boring, to everyone, they just don't realise it yet.

I would bring in Vehicles.
 

LMCampbell

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
890
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
It IS terribly boring, to everyone, they just don't realise it yet.

I would bring in Vehicles.
Click to expand...

That is a terrible way to think if you consider that just because it's your opinion it's amounted as fact. (Don't do that "I didn't say that", But you implied it.)

What would happen if the opposite team had both the vehicles which is going to be an obvious bonus to that team, Since everyone wants to use it. Wouldn't you leave the game as you would likely be losing.?
 

Evilmaster09

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
264
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
No, it actually IS a terrible game.

The trick would be to put them in the spawn and make the spawn inaccessible to the other team. Its happened to me hundreds of time and I just shoot them down.
 

LMCampbell

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
890
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
No, it actually IS a terrible game.

The trick would be to put them in the spawn and make the spawn inaccessible to the other team. Its happened to me hundreds of time and I just shoot them down.
Click to expand...

No, It's your opinion that it's a terrible game. You saying it's a terrible doesn't present a fact that it is a terrible game.

But what about when it isn't in the spawn when the player controlling it died, or left the game and it's open for the other player.

Anyway, It wouldn't help the game if one vehicle was for one team and the other vehicle was for another. Where's the fun for the people out of the Vehicle. (Should I guess that your the guy who hides in it and thinks it's great? )
 

Evilmaster09

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
264
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Then the other player can take it, and the other team would have rockets.

Its not an opinion, its voted worst game of the year by the gaming community, so its fact now.

You make multiple vehicles with multiple spaces for different people, but you don't want everyone to be in vehicles otherwise CoD would then be based about vehicle warfare, which isn't a bad idea actually.
 

LMCampbell

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
890
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
But then their wouldn't be any vehicles on the map as they'd be destroyed. So it would just be the same.

Got a Link to it?

It's been done before in "W.A.W" why hasn't it been continued if it worked ?
 

Evilmaster09

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Posts
264
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Its news, link not needed.

They would respawn, obviously , and make them unseeable to the enemy team, like around a corner so they can't fire rockets at them in spawn.

It was discontinued in WaW (tanks, not vehicles) probably because there wasn't enough and the maps are too small to fit vehicles in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register