Cannibullshit

Status
Not open for further replies.
Astro

Astro

User is banned.
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Posts
3,423
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
So what's with all the oppression in the S&T section?

The section is designed to post stupid shit that wouldn't be allowed elsewhere, and now you're trying to tighten it's reins?

Come on now, I think you know better.
 
Cann!bal said:
http://www.forumkorner.com/thread-61022.html

Yeah! Stop enforcing the rules, you oppressive dictator!
Click to expand...

You're not enforcing jack shit.

The S&T section isn't to be taken seriously.

It must be a really slow day in the FK staff department if you're having threads closed for speaking against you.
Instead of abusing your power buttons as much as you masturbate, go do something useful.

For starters you could clarify what can and cannot be said in the S&T section without it being closed no reason.
Thank you.
 
Knock, knock.
Who's there?
Cannibal.
Cannibal who?
Can of bullshit.
 
Astro said:
@"cann!bal", you're not enforcing jack shit.

The S&T section isn't to be taken seriously.

I mean seriously, it must be a really slow day in the FK staff department if you're having threads closed for speaking against you.
Instead of abusing your power buttons as much as you masturbate, go do something useful.

For starters you could clarify what can and cannot be said in the S&T section without it being closed no reason.
Thank you.
Click to expand...

I shouldn't even bother refuting you when the blatancy of your error is that transparent. However, I will.

I'm not enforcing "jack shit"? I suggest you look at the bans page, and if you could look at the moderation logs and warnings logs, I would suggest you look at those too. (Of the last 100 warnings issued, I have handed 92 of them.) I'm the most active member on the site and have the more than 3,300 reported posts in total, not to mention all the reported posts I've dealt with. All I do is enforce the rules so I can make ForumKorner a better place; yet here I am being constantly fabricated into lies, and harassed and threatened on the daily for doing my volunteer job. I have no ambition to oppress and abuse you, you fool.

I haven't closed or junked any threads for the reasoning that they're speaking against me. If you attempted to even get to know me or knew me in the slightest, you would know how passionate I am about injustice and oppression. Don't fabricate me in your lies. I have never closed or junked a thread without reason. Seriously, give me one legitimate reason why I would if I have no reason. I'm not required to tell you why you're thread was closed or junked, however, if you ask I'll gladly tell you.
 
Cann!bal said:
I shouldn't even bother refuting you when the blatancy of your error is that transparent. However, I will.

I'm not enforcing "jack shit"? I suggest you look at the bans page, and if you could look at the moderation logs and warnings logs, I would suggest you look at those too. (Of the last 100 warnings issued, I have handed 92 of them.) I'm the most active member on the site and have the more than 3,300 reported posts in total, not to mention all the reported posts I've dealt with. All I do is enforce the rules so I can make ForumKorner a better place; yet here I am being constantly fabricated into lies, and harassed and threatened on the daily for doing my volunteer job. I have no ambition to oppress and abuse you, you fool.

I haven't closed or junked any threads for the reasoning that they're speaking against me. If you attempted to even get to know me or knew me in the slightest, you would know how passionate I am about injustice and oppression. Don't fabricate me in your lies. I have never closed or junked a thread without reason. Seriously, give me one legitimate reason why I would if I have no reason. I'm not required to tell you why you're thread was closed or junked, however, if you ask I'll gladly tell you.
Click to expand...

I guess I have to agree with you, mate. Only because I know what it's like being abused for enforcing rules for a voluntary job.
 
Cann!bal said:
I shouldn't even bother refuting you when the blatancy of your error is that transparent. However, I will.

I'm not enforcing "jack shit"? I suggest you look at the bans page, and if you could look at the moderation logs and warnings logs, I would suggest you look at those too. (Of the last 100 warnings issued, I have handed 92 of them.) I'm the most active member on the site and have the more than 3,300 reported posts in total, not to mention all the reported posts I've dealt with. All I do is enforce the rules so I can make ForumKorner a better place; yet here I am being constantly fabricated into lies, and harassed and threatened on the daily for doing my volunteer job. I have no ambition to oppress and abuse you, you fool.

I haven't closed or junked any threads for the reasoning that they're speaking against me. If you attempted to even get to know me or knew me in the slightest, you would know how passionate I am about injustice and oppression. Don't fabricate me in your lies. I have never closed or junked a thread without reason. Seriously, give me one legitimate reason why I would if I have no reason. I'm not required to tell you why you're thread was closed or junked, however, if you ask I'll gladly tell you.
Click to expand...

Well kudos to you for having the numbers, but I really don't care nor did I ask for your moderation statistics.

You're taking my accusations way out of context. I applaud you for moderating the forum voluntarily, and I do agree that outside of the S&T section your decisions are logical. But that's not what the OP concerned.

Must I reiterate that this is the S&T section? I'm under the impression that your own self righteousness is clouding your judgment. If you think it's worth enforcing a minor rule in the S&T section such as the one you suggested above, then I would question your reliability as a moderator. Many rules are disregarded in this section, and that is exactly how it should be.

If you still have an issue with the way the S&T section works, I would strongly suggest writing an official post listing all of the appropriate rules that are to be enforced. I do believe Gr33d touched on this, but in light of recent events it would seem that you wish to enforce more.

As for the closing of threads, it would seem that whenever I mention your name, or an event in relation to you, in one of my threads, it would get closed shorty after it was posted. This may be pure coincidence, but it led me to suggest that you didn't appreciate being called out and wanted to shut me down. When I asked you for the reason via PM, I didn't deem it to be a valid, which sparked my protest against you. Just to clarify, in your eyes the reason may have been good enough, but in mine it was not, and I therefore referenced it above as 'no reason'.
This was also supported by the fact that I did not agree with you when closing the threads to enforce the rules in the S&T section.
 
Astro said:
Well kudos to you for having the numbers, but I really don't care nor did I ask for your moderation statistics.

You're taking my accusations way out of context. I applaud you for moderating the forum voluntarily, and I do agree that outside of the S&T section your decisions are logical. But that's not what the OP concerned.

Must I reiterate that this is the S&T section? I'm under the impression that your own self righteousness is clouding your judgment. If you think it's worth enforcing a minor rule in the S&T section such as the one you suggested above, then I would question your reliability as a moderator. Many rules are disregarded in this section, and that is exactly how it should be.

If you still have an issue with the way the S&T section works, I would strongly suggest writing an official post listing all of the appropriate rules that are to be enforced. I do believe GrƷƷd touched on this, but in light of recent events it would seem that you wish to enforce more.

As for the closing of threads, it would seem that whenever I mention your name, or an event in relation to you, in one of my threads, it would get closed shorty after it was posted. This may be pure coincidence, but it led me to suggest that you didn't appreciate being called out and wanted to shut me down. When I asked you for the reason via PM, I didn't deem it to be a valid, which sparked my protest against you. Just to clarify, in your eyes the reason may have been good enough, but in mine it was not, and I therefore referenced it above as 'no reason'.
This was also supported by the fact that I did not agree with you when closing the threads to enforce the rules in the S&T section.
Click to expand...

Then make a suggestion thread instead of harassing me?

I've closed and junked only two threads of yours, and they were the same thread! Because you decided to go against my ruling! It was a pointless drama thread about Aleyoso, which was full of fallacious rumors. No virtues would arise from the making of that thread, purely unnecessary adversities. It had nothing to do with me being mentioned in there. I would have still junked it if it didn't.
 
Cann!bal said:
Then make a suggestion thread instead of harassing me?

I've closed and junked only two threads of yours, and they were the same thread! Because you decided to go against my ruling! It was a pointless drama thread about Aleyoso, which was full of fallacious rumors. No virtues would arise from the making of that thread, purely unnecessary adversities. It had nothing to do with me being mentioned in there. I would have still junked it if it didn't.
Click to expand...

I would prefer the term bantering, and simply because you're the only person on this forum that I can enjoy a good argument with. So excuse me for targeting you, it was mainly for my amusement (as the section suggests).

I'll always stand by my own opinion that those threads were junked for a petty reason, but I'm willing to put that behind me.

Closing this thread now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Featured

• General Discussion
• Inactive FK Username Requests

Share this page

Back
Top