• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

Change rep numbers.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tyler-

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
I recon take away -/+9

Keep it how it was previously with rg elite, sponser, staff, admin
 

Deathcrow

Power member.
Reputation
0
We will see. It might be good to get rid of premium and merge all those benefits over to RG Elite. Increase rep might still be a nice incentive for people to want to upgrade, so I am not sure if it will go to simply -/+1. Alternatively it could be lowered to something like 3.

Everything will be discussed and talked about over the next few weeks. We will do our best to straighten everything out.
 

Tyler-

Onyx user!
Reputation
0

well its the same as its always been now, except for premium +/-9
 

Joshua_mybb_import21010

Active Member
Reputation
0
I agree, I believe the +/- 9 is a little excessive.

Deathcrow said:
Increase rep might still be a nice incentive for people to want to upgrade, so I am not sure if it will go to simply -/+1. Alternatively it could be lowered to something like 3.
You'd still be paying for the additional reputation you could apply. It'd just be reduced to the regular amount upon purchasing elite or sponsor. Regulars would still receive the -/+1 and upgraded members being given the privilege of -/+3 or 4.
 

Tyler-

Onyx user!
Reputation
0

Precisely this.
 

Deathwish

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
+9 is super excessive. Also, you should be able to +rep or -rep someone more than once, maybe once every day?
 

Deathcrow

Power member.
Reputation
0
@"Tyler" and @"Joshua", that sounds good to me.

Deathwish said:
+9 is super excessive. Also, you should be able to +rep or -rep someone more than once, maybe once every day?

I am not sure about that, Deathwish. That kind of makes the "reputation" aspect of it get watered down even further than it already somewhat is.
 

Bmthrules

Power member.
Reputation
0
I won't be changing any of the reputation rates, most of them are paid features.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.