Deal With Caution @Roy

Basically had a whole deal lined for a twitter for 1150 in Bitcoin.

User thought I was going to go first
I thought he was going to go first

(the idea of a middle man was brought up but it didnt seem to matter
as I thought he was going first and he thought I was going first the 
whole time)

So when time comes to deal we each think the other party is going first

The user then calls me "sketchy" and calls off the deal even after telling
him that Id be more than happy to use a middle man AND cover the 
costs.

Suddenly this user goes from being more than excited to finally workout 
the deal, then as soon as I dont want to go first/ use middle man he says
"I was cool with one for awhile. I hate when deals are altered."

I dont know I may just be overlooking this. But if you saw from my side 
how happy this kid was to first deal

"Really?! You're the man! 1150 is much more doable. You're fucking awesome. 
Yesyesyesyesyes I'm so pumped right now lol. Do you have skype?" (copy and pasted from PM)


From that to not wanting to deal because "I dont like when deals are altered"

I dont know if it was me I dont see a middle man as a big problem like
I told him because it makes sure that both parties money/account is secure

He also allegedly was getting the bitcoin from his friend in which he claims
I wasted my time getting his shit exchanged and he never even proved
to me owning the bitcoin when I asked 
(update midpost he said he "already sold it back" I asked for screenshots
of transactions and no proof.

This just looks like a failed scamming attempt to me. Stay safe FK
and happy holidays.

(would show proof of convos but I dont know how to work the
app on windows 8 and use gyazo so sorry and if you dont believe 
me pm me and Id be more than happy to try and show you.)

P.S This is all highlighted since I copied and pasted his PM 
and I dont know how to undo it fml.

I do not understand this thread

Seven said:

I do not understand this thread

Click to expand...

Basically me and @Roy had a deal lined up for my twitter for 1150. The whole deal was lined up he "had the bitcoin" etc etc.
Once it came down to the transaction I told him to Pm me the deal and lets do it through private message the whole time
I thought he was going first and I thought he was going first when the deal came down to happening and we both thought
each other were going first I asked him to the payment and he said "I thought you were going first" with the confusion I 
said ok lets just get a middle man so each of us is safe.. (makes the most sense) after I bring this up suddenly the user
doesnt want to deal and calls me sketchy and attempts to call me sketchy and say that Im trying to use reverse physchology.

In the end. User was going to buy twitter. I didnt go first. Once I offered a middle man user no longer wants to deal. And I asked 
after for proof of funds and he said he already sent back and removed me on skype

Seven said:

I do not understand this thread

Click to expand...

Let me clarify.

> Set a deal for $1,150 (3.59 BTC)
> He asks if I have a MM in mind, I said no and am comfortable without one but we can use one.
> I convert my $1,150 to BTC for him.
> I tell him I never go first.
> He tells me he expects me to go first.
> I call deal off because of miscommunication/altered deal.
> I call him sketchy because of him altering the deal.
> He flips it on me and makes a warning post.

The kid is a fucking joke of a business man.

---

@ any staff member; please delete/close this stain of a post. This is libel.

@Rude @Color @Michael @Hope @Beware @Philly

Roy said:

Let me clarify.

> Set a deal for $1,150 (3.59 BTC)
> He asks if I have a MM in mind, I said no and am comfortable without one but we can use one.
> I convert my $1,150 to BTC for him.
> I tell him I never go first.
> He tells me he expects me to go first.
> I call deal off because of miscommunication/altered deal.
> I call him sketchy because of him altering the deal.
> He flips it on me and makes a warning post.

The kid is a fucking joke of a business man.

Click to expand...

1. You never proved funds, if this is true that gyazo or screenshot your recent transactions on your wallet..
2. Never recall you saying you never go first.
3. You call the deal off once I recommend a middle man but the whole time you were more than stoked.

Today I learned I am sketchy for wanting to use a middle man!

Edit: I am also a joke in business! Even though this kid said my account isnt good with 300 rts on a 71k not to mention
he thinks snapchats have niches

Edit #2: Why should the staff close my thread exposes you for an attempted scam, what is this censorship.
stop trying to cover the truth bud.

AyyLmao said:

1. You never proved funds, if this is true that gyazo or screenshot your recent transactions on your wallet..
2. Never recall you saying you never go first.
3. You call the deal off once I recommend a middle man but the whole time you were more than stoked.

Today I learned I am sketchy for wanting to use a middle man!

Click to expand...

1.) You asked for proof of funds AFTER I gave back BTC from the connections that sold to me for this deal, because I called it off.

2.) Conversation of me saying I do not go first:

[12/24/14, 11:22:38 PM] King: I got the follow & I’d like to make as few transactions as possible tbh… and idk this guy enough to give him 150. I always like to go second so even though he’d be going first, I don’t even have a wallet
[12/24/14, 11:22:49 PM] King: I always go second* lol
[12/24/14, 11:23:13 PM] King: However, I will ask all of my friends if they have BTC they’d exchange for PP
[12/24/14, 11:23:24 PM] King: I’m bound to have a few people who will buy

3.) I called the deal off because of an altered deal, as anyone would. I'm not spending $1,150 on someone who can't communicate clearly.

This is a joke.

---

AyyLmao said:

1. You never proved funds, if this is true that gyazo or screenshot your recent transactions on your wallet..
2. Never recall you saying you never go first.
3. You call the deal off once I recommend a middle man but the whole time you were more than stoked.

Today I learned I am sketchy for wanting to use a middle man!

Edit: I am also a joke in business! Even though this kid said my account isnt good with 300 rts on a 71k not to mention
he thinks snapchats have niches

Edit #2: Why should the staff close my thread exposes you for an attempted scam, what is this censorship.
stop trying to cover the truth bud.

Click to expand...

Snapchat niches: eWhore/pornstar, company, guy, girl, etc.

Holy shit you're fucking stupid.
You don't even own a bank account. What do you know about handling money LOL.

Roy said:

1.) You asked for proof of funds AFTER I gave back BTC from the connections that sold to me for this deal, because I called it off.

2.) Conversation of me saying I do not go first:

[12/24/14, 11:22:38 PM] King: I got the follow & I’d like to make as few transactions as possible tbh… and idk this guy enough to give him 150. I always like to go second so even though he’d be going first, I don’t even have a wallet
[12/24/14, 11:22:49 PM] King: I always go second* lol
[12/24/14, 11:23:13 PM] King: However, I will ask all of my friends if they have BTC they’d exchange for PP
[12/24/14, 11:23:24 PM] King: I’m bound to have a few people who will buy

3.) I called the deal off because of an altered deal, as anyone would. I'm not spending $1,150 on someone who can't communicate clearly.

This is a joke.

Click to expand...

1.) Doesnt matter with bitcoin it has to go through a number of confirmations and will still showup in your transactions for months..
You still cant prove you had the funds.

2.) I didnt recall that but I guess you did mention that and I didnt see it. Which still isnt even a valid point

3.) And anyone would call off a deal they were pumped about as soon as a middle man is introduced..
seems legit to me.

AyyLmao said:

1.) Doesnt matter with bitcoin it has to go through a number of confirmations and will still showup in your transactions for months..
You still cant prove you had the funds.

2.) I didnt recall that but I guess you did mention that and I didnt see it. Which still isnt even a valid point

3.) And anyone would call off a deal they were pumped about as soon as a middle man is introduced..
seems legit to me.

Click to expand...

I had 2 options.
1.) Buy your account for $1,150.
2.) Invest $600 tops and spend a little time on it for the same result.

Wouldn't you call off a deal if your alternate suddenly became a safer option? I think so.

Roy said:

I had 2 options.
1.) Buy your account for $1,150.
2.) Invest $600 tops and spend a little time on it for the same result.

Wouldn't you call off a deal if your alternate suddenly became a safer option? I think so.

Click to expand...

Youre trying to use that as an excuse suddenly that is all a problem after I mention a middle man that wasnt
a problem in the deal before that not to mention if you think youre going to gain 71k on twitter easily and with no
expierence and $600 youre mistaken. Youre calling me sketchy after I even lowered the deal for you to make it 
more suitable for your budget and allow you to buy a deck to keep gaining.

AyyLmao said:

Youre trying to use that as an excuse suddenly that is all a problem after I mention a middle man that wasnt
a problem in the deal before that not to mention if you think youre going to gain 71k on twitter easily and with no
expierence and $600 youre mistaken. Youre calling me sketchy after I even lowered the deal for you to make it 
more suitable for your budget and allow you to buy a deck to keep gaining.

Click to expand...

It's a business decision, not an excuse.
You're so butthurt that I'm not wasting my money on you.
Stop being a drama queen. It's a failed deal. Move past it and stop making warning posts because a deal doesn't go through.

Roy said:

It's a business decision, not an excuse.
You're so butthurt that I'm not wasting my money on you.
Stop being a drama queen. It's a failed deal. Move past it and stop making warning posts because a deal doesn't go through.

Click to expand...

Im not butthurt just trying to save members from dealing with sketchy users like yourself.

You have still yet to prove you ever had the funds to even buy this. Once you atleast prove that Ill drop this and wont care only
because than I will believe your lie. Until then ive proved you more than wrong. Till then please dont even bother replying.

AyyLmao said:

Im not butthurt just trying to save members from dealing with sketchy users like yourself.

You have still yet to prove you ever had the funds to even buy this. Once you atleast prove that Ill drop this and wont care only
because than I will believe your lie. Until then ive proved you more than wrong. Till then please dont even bother replying.

Click to expand...

Oooo, you're killing my business because I'm not showing off my money. I don't have to prove anything to you. Do you think Snapchat asked Facebook for proof of funds before declining their $3B offer? Maybe they asked for proof after they declined? You're not gonna see shit. Speculate all you want; you're not worth satisfying. It's actually more amusing to me to see you so upset about not seeing my money.
You'll never know if I actually have money.

Roy said:

Oooo, you're killing my business because I'm not showing off my money. I don't have to prove anything to you. Do you think Snapchat asked Facebook for proof of funds before declining their $3B offer? Maybe the asked for proof after they declined? You're not gonna see shit. Speculate all you want; you're not worth satisfying. It's actually more amusing to me to see you so upset about not seeing my money.
You'll never know if I actually have money.

Click to expand...

You should have nothing to lose by showing the transactions of the money you claim to have had to buy my account.. And this isnt a 3B dollar deal this is a 1,150 dollar deal on a forum website. Nice try change the subject and like i said im not mad about the deal not going through like I said just wanna warn people of people like you