Deal WIth Caution Userbar

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dura

Active Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2012
Posts
991
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
I've noticed that the ex-Staff member Phenom/Flipper does not have to wear his DWC userbar. I honestly do not think this is fair, because i've had it for almost a month now, and he's had it , idk maybe less that a week. If he shouldn't have to wear it, i shouldnt have to wear it either because it is only fair :( Please admins read this and sort this out because I would like to see some action taken place. Either me not having to wear it anymore or Phenom/Flipper having to wear it again.
 
Dura said:
I've noticed that the ex-Staff member Phenom/Flipper does not have to wear his DWC userbar. I honestly do not think this is fair, because i've had it for almost a month now, and he's had it , idk maybe less that a week. If he shouldn't have to wear it, i shouldnt have to wear it either because it is only fair :( Please admins read this and sort this out because I would like to see some action taken place. Either me not having to wear it anymore or Phenom/Flipper having to wear it again.
Click to expand...

I agree with you. Techno didn't have to make an obsessive thread about something that is none of his business. Good Luck Though.
 
I was wondering about this also.

And what about the user "GWK" , he had a legit scam report on him, it got moved to "Known Scammers" , he got banned then unbanned. No DWC userbar for him?
 
#Support, your welcome Dura. Might as well fucking take it off cause clearly they don't care about users trades here. Except for cole and Massimo.
 
Techno said:
HEnce the reason for my thread before this one.

#Fair
Click to expand...

Well Christy removed Phenoms cause she does stuff for friends which isnt right. Dura should either not wear it, or Phenom has to wear it.

#Fair
 
Phenom was never supposed to have the bar in the first place because he refunded within 3 days. So the admins fucked up giving him that bar. So the real problem lies there.


Once again instead of going by the rules staff goes by what they feel is right. What good is envious now?
 
Massimo said:
Phenom was never supposed to have the bar in the first place because he refunded within 3 days. So the admins fucked up giving him that bar. So the real problem lies there.


Once again instead of going by the rules staff goes by what they feel is right. What good is envious now?
Click to expand...

Oh shit, sir Massi is droppin knowledge.

Gettem girl.
 
Massimo said:
Phenom was never supposed to have the bar in the first place because he refunded within 3 days. So the admins fucked up giving him that bar. So the real problem lies there.


Once again instead of going by the rules staff goes by what they feel is right. What good is envious now?
Click to expand...

Refund or no refund he scammed for 3days. It would of been a ban so it's only natural you put him in the group. That's pretty stupid logic... Oh 72houra of scamming him I guess I don't need the bar when I attempted to scam but felt bad. So you are saying I have the right to scam someone for 72hours and then refund and not get the userbar? Are you fucking kidding me?
 
Techno said:
Refund or no refund he scammed for 3days. It would of been a ban so it's only natural you put him in the group. That's pretty stupid logic... Oh 72houra of scamming him I guess I don't need the bar when I attempted to scam but felt bad. So you are saying I have the right to scam someone for 72hours and then refund and not get the userbar? Are you fucking kidding me?
Click to expand...

Valid statement scam = scam no matter how long it went on for or what actions happen after the fact.
 
Techno said:
Refund or no refund he scammed for 3days. It would of been a ban so it's only natural you put him in the group. That's pretty stupid logic... Oh 72houra of scamming him I guess I don't need the bar when I attempted to scam but felt bad. So you are saying I have the right to scam someone for 72hours and then refund and not get the userbar? Are you fucking kidding me?
Click to expand...

Lol so if FK's logic is that if you return the item within 3 days, and your fine, I may aswell scam a nice tag and play on it for awhile.

Brb while I post a thread about "buying" a tag.
 
TsGh FeaR said:
Valid statement scam = scam no matter how long it went on for or what actions happen after the fact.
Click to expand...

I know it is, I'm criticizing Massimo's logic on his paragraph and mocking him on the stupidity he posted. As a MM he should know better.
 
Techno said:
I know it is, I'm criticizing Massimo's logic on his paragraph and mocking him on the stupidity he posted. As a MM he should know better.
Click to expand...

Hes just going by the rules dawg. You should be getting mad at the silly person named Christy that made that rule.
 
Poop said:
Hes just going by the rules dawg. You should be getting mad at the silly person named Christy that made that rule.
Click to expand...

For someone who criticizes staff and says theirs corruption like us he's sure not heading te right direction. Of any rule is corrupt it has to be this one.
 
Poop said:
Lol so if FK's logic is that if you return the item within 3 days, and your fine, I may aswell scam a nice tag and play on it for awhile.

Brb while I post a thread about "buying" a tag.
Click to expand...

Thats the rules implemented.
Just like if you steal something from the store, your mommy will give it back saying sorry. No harm done to her..

Dont fight with Massi, hes just following the rules and letting all you know.
 
Poop said:
Lol so if FK's logic is that if you return the item within 3 days, and your fine, I may aswell scam a nice tag and play on it for awhile.

Brb while I post a thread about "buying" a tag.
Click to expand...

Poop i fucking love you, that was great my nig.
 
I agree with you, this is unfair and if you have to wear it so should he.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Featured

• General Discussion
• Inactive FK Username Requests

Share this page

Back
Top