Dear Word-Fearing Forum Members

If I have linked you this thread, you are being an idiot.

You have at your fingertips, the immense first-world convenience of deciphering the definition of any word... in mere seconds. In the Age of Information, being ignorant and out of tune with refinement, circumstantially intimate communication, is optional. Instead of selfishly whining and attempting to convert me to your illogical and bigoted agenda, perhaps, you could prompt your extensive journey to learning a new word with acknowledgement of the inconvenience entailed by being an illiterate fuck.

Efficient communication is quintessential to efficient coexistence; for it yields the connection, intimacy, and co-empowerment we innately desire as human beings. The words and sentence structures I utilize in my speech are products of a incremental process of trial and error, in which I mentally catalog words and techniques I observe in daily conversation, then apply to my speech in attempt of refining my communicative abilities. I have personally noticed descriptive text, frequently obscure text, capable of condensing large quantities of information as the most ideal refiners, which act as practically necessities due to their extensive convenience.

I recognize that my communicative abilities may encompass lengthy means of focus and deconstruction for my audience, however, if you sincerely wanted to understand me, would it not be fair to say you would be attempting to decipher my work, rather than fussing and consenting to ignorance? I don't see why I ought to simmer myself to appeal to a layman understanding of the world when you don't even extend a will to understand me through deconstruction. It's utterly unwarranted. Besides, generalizing and confining myself for the sake of appealing to a broader audience would be anti-communicative, forsaking my poetry and my intention.

So, fuck you. No, I'm not going to write to appeal to your sensibilities and layman narrative.

Could you make this easier to read

Kthnxbai

is this in response of everyone being butthurt at your big-boy words?

TO ALL PEOPLE WHO THINK HE NEEDS TO USE SMALLER WORDS:

you need to understand that everyone uses different dialects based on their environment. Just because my boy @'cann!bal' was born in a library (jokes), doesn't mean he needs to make his words dumber just so you can understand him. it's his (im assuming he's american) american born right to use whatever words he feels like.

@"Cann!bal" My English Professor would hate you. Probably because everything you write is extremely convoluted and hard to follow. Cut down on those run-on sentences a bit.

Icarus said:

@"Cann!bal" My English Professor would hate you. Probably because everything you write is extremely convoluted and hard to follow. Cut down on those run-on sentences a bit.

Click to expand...

If your English Professor is nearly as pseudo-magnificent as your illustration of them makes me think, I probably would hate them too.

Anyone with a fairly vast vernacular can easily decipher and follow my rhetoric. I think the difficulty of my work is overly exaggerated.

I don't see a single instance of a run-on sentence. Length is irrelevant in run-on sentences.

http://i.imgur.com/Z9kXlnE.png

can you spot the mistake? @'cann!bal'

Random said:

http://i.imgur.com/Z9kXlnE.png

can you spot the mistake? @'cann!bal'

Click to expand...

I changed example to instance for I thought it flowed more fluidly. There was no mistake.

EDIT: Whoops.

Wow, that's a lot of words, no thank you. Even though I wasn't linked

Cann!bal said:

If your English Professor is nearly as pseudo-magnificent as your illustration of them makes me think, I probably would hate them too.

Anyone with a fairly vast vernacular can easily decipher and follow my rhetoric. I think the difficulty of my work is overly exaggerated.

I don't see a single instance of a run-on sentence. Length is irrelevant in run-on sentences.

Click to expand...

Run-on sentence:
I recognize that my communicative abilities may encompass lengthy means of focus and deconstruction for my audience, however, if you sincerely wanted to understand me, would it not be fair to say you would be attempting to decipher my work, rather than fussing and consenting to ignorance?
Correct:
I recognize that my communicative abilities may encompass lengthy means of focus and deconstruction for my audience. However, if you sincerely wanted to understand me, would it be unfair to say you would be attempting to decipher my work, rather than fussing and consenting to ignorance?
And what the fuck are you saying in this line? It makes no sense.
however, if you sincerely wanted to understand me, would it not be fair to say you would be attempting to decipher my work, rather than fussing and consenting to ignorance?

Icarus said:

Run-on sentence:
I recognize that my communicative abilities may encompass lengthy means of focus and deconstruction for my audience, however, if you sincerely wanted to understand me, would it not be fair to say you would be attempting to decipher my work, rather than fussing and consenting to ignorance?
Correct:
I recognize that my communicative abilities may encompass lengthy means of focus and deconstruction for my audience. However, if you sincerely wanted to understand me, would it be unfair to say you would be attempting to decipher my work, rather than fussing and consenting to ignorance?
And what the fuck are you saying in this line? It makes no sense.
however, if you sincerely wanted to understand me, would it not be fair to say you would be attempting to decipher my work, rather than fussing and consenting to ignorance?

Click to expand...

The 'however' was acting as a conjunctive adverb, tying the two independent clauses together; it was not suppose to be the beginning of an entire different sentence. Regardless, I don't claim to be a grammatical genius or a linguistic wizard. Moreover, you claimed existence of multiple instances, not solely one.

I don't see how it's not intelligible. Nevertheless, I was attempting to manifest the laughable folly within the demands of word-fearers by exhibiting how they consent to ignorance and complacency, rather than prompting themselves with an initiative to understand my work through means of potentially lengthy, mental deconstruction. Go figure.

Cann!bal said:

I changed example to instance for I thought it flowed more fluidly. There was no mistake.

EDIT: Whoops.

Click to expand...

Would saying "them" be wrong since your talking about one person? Not a joke I legit want to know.

Seven said:

Would saying "them" be wrong since your talking about one person? Not a joke I legit want to know.

Click to expand...

No. I don't know their gender, hence them.

This is, simply put, retarded. Cannibal, I like you, but be real. There is no "convenience" in your long ass, overly descriptive sentences. From what I take, you'd like for people to read what you write. The most effective and talented writer, is one with the ability to convey their thoughts as timely as possible. This also leaves out your common error of putting sentences together with words making no sense.

As an example:
Lengthy and overly descriptive; unneccessary: "You have at your fingertips, the immense first-world convenience of deciphering the definition of any word... in mere seconds."

Normal, but still in college; interested in writing: "You have the convenience of defining any word in seconds."

You mentioned convenience as an argument. Heh.

Color said:

This is, simply put, retarded.  Cannibal, I like you, but be real.  There is no "convenience" in your long ass, overly descriptive sentences.  From what I take, you'd like for people to read what you write.  The most effective and talented writer, is one with the ability to convey their thoughts as timely as possible.  This also leaves out your common error of putting sentences together with words making no sense.

As an example:  
Lengthy and overly descriptive; unneccessary:  "You have at your fingertips, the immense first-world convenience of deciphering the definition of any word... in mere seconds."

Normal, but still in college; interested in writing:  "You have the convenience of defining any word in seconds."  

You mentioned convenience as an argument.  Heh.

Click to expand...

I was being detailed and poetic; there is certainly 'convenience' in that. No, I wouldn't like for people to read what I write... Of course I do! The most effective and talented writers are most definitely not the ones to convey their thoughts as timely as possible; however, the ones who can convey their thoughts thoroughly as possible. That is to be as eloquent, sincere, and timely as possible.

That's so bland and unpoetic. Its effort to captivate the reader is poor. You can taste how flavorless the second sentence is in comparison to the first when you read them.

@Swish You're so cringey.

Please refrain from tagging me in this long and unappealing post as I do not care, nor should I care. Thanks.

Oh, I guarantee that you wouldn't of even mentioned me if I didn't kudos @Color's post. Get over yourself, not everyone is gonna use your immense vocabulary on an online forum where it's not meant to be taken seriously.

Cann!bal said:

I was being detailed and poetic; there is certainly 'convenience' in that. No, I wouldn't like for people to read what I write... Of course I do! The most effective and talented writers are most definitely not the ones to convey their thoughts as timely as possible; however, the ones who can convey their thoughts thoroughly as possible. That is to be as eloquent, sincere, and timely as possible.

That's so bland and unpoetic. Its effort to captivate the reader is poor. You can taste how flavorless the second sentence is in comparison to the first when you read them.

@Swish You're so cringey.

Click to expand...

To be fair, it can depend on audience. If you're aiming toward a wide audience or someone who'll read into it, you're way off. However, if you're aiming to impress members of a forum, you're spot on.

Color said:

To be fair, it can depend on audience.  If you're aiming toward a wide audience or someone who'll read into it, you're way off.  However, if you're aiming to impress members of a forum, you're spot on.

Click to expand...

I really am questioning if you read my thread at all. My whole point was essentially, "Fuck you. I'm going to do my thing."

How am I not aiming for an audience who'll read into it?

@Darth Vader @Swish @Triad

You guys make me squirm.

Cann!bal said:

I really am questioning if you read my thread at all. My whole point was essentially, "Fuck you. I'm going to do my thing."

How am I not aiming for an audience who'll read into it?

@Darth Vader @Swish @Triad

You guys make me squirm.

Click to expand...

its ok cannonball, just remember #kony2012 never forget and you'll save the kids

Cann!bal said:

I really am questioning if you read my thread at all. My whole point was essentially, "Fuck you. I'm going to do my thing."

How am I not aiming for an audience who'll read into it?

@Darth Vader @Swish @Triad

You guys make me squirm.

Click to expand...

Then perhaps it's in the wrong section, and perhaps it should've been closed as soon as it were opened. I read the entire thread, then proceeded to leave my thoughts. For someone with such supposed intellect, you're acting like a goof. Why do you feel the need to insult those who disagree with you? Writing is not a "one size fits all" type of thing, and your "size" fits few, because it's of less use. Good luck.