Christian don't know, Muslims don't know, Atheists don't know, Agnostics don't know. Nobody knows. No evidence. There may be, but who knows. Nobody. So don't go asking "Is religion true? Do YOU think it is?" Because it CAN'T be answered with a simple yes or no.
I kind of wrote that in a mad rage so sorry if it doesn't make any sense.
Christian don't know, Muslims don't know, Atheists don't know, Agnostics don't know. Nobody knows. No evidence. There may be, but who knows. Nobody. So don't go asking "Is religion true? Do YOU think it is?" Because it CAN'T be answered with a simple yes or no.
I kind of wrote that in a mad rage so sorry if it doesn't make any sense.
'Agnostics' belief are the more credible because they don't disprove anyone else's.'
If you think long and hard about it, it makes sense. One religion believes in one thing and another believes in something different. Having said that, the fact that both oppositions are constantly being challened and atempted to be disproved, you can't really lend all your trust to either of them.
On the other hand, if I said 'I don't belive in anything because there isn't enough irrefutable evidence in this world to be one hundred percent certain', no one can argue against that. It's mere logical reasoning. It's like someone saying, 'That's not possible because I didn't see, therefore it didn't happen'. And then you arguing that it did happen.
I hope you see what I'm getting at here.
Agnostics stand is neutral so its the easiest perspective to take part in. How can it be a lie?
I don't think any of them are bull, as people need something to believe in, something to look forward to (heaven). Or wherever the other lands, and whatever they might be.
It's just something people like to look forward too, honestly. Life isn't that exciting, heaven may be.