You should have a fail face, considering this:God said:
God said:
They are doesn't qualify as there are
Assangha said:
If a comma is a BREAK in a sentence, using too many is serious ANNOYING to read, IMO.
You should have a fail face, considering this:God said:Commas confuse me sometimes. They're too many rules, I always end up making a run-on sentence and failing epically at making complicated sentences. :failface:
God said:They're too many rules
Assangha said:I am a comma Nazi. Seriously, I use way to many commas. Not going to lie. :3
Reality said:You should have a fail face, considering this:God said:Commas confuse me sometimes. They're too many rules, I always end up making a run-on sentence and failing epically at making complicated sentences. :failface:
God said:They're too many rules
They are doesn't qualify as there areui:
Assangha said:I am a comma Nazi. Seriously, I use way to many commas. Not going to lie. :3
If a comma is a BREAK in a sentence, using too many is serious ANNOYING to read, IMO.
God said:@Reality I fixed it before you posted that. I was typing too fast and wasn't thinking.I usually try to use proper grammar.
Reality said:You should have a fail face, considering this:God said:Commas confuse me sometimes. They're too many rules, I always end up making a run-on sentence and failing epically at making complicated sentences. :failface:
God said:They're too many rules
They are doesn't qualify as there areui:
Assangha said:I am a comma Nazi. Seriously, I use way to many commas. Not going to lie. :3
If a comma is a BREAK in a sentence, using too many is serious ANNOYING to read, IMO.
It should be "seriously" annoying, you use an adverb not an adjective.ui: Put your failface on please. Also, there shouldn't be a comma before IMO. ui:
Reality said:God said:@Reality I fixed it before you posted that. I was typing too fast and wasn't thinking.I usually try to use proper grammar.
Reality said:You should have a fail face, considering this:God said:Commas confuse me sometimes. They're too many rules, I always end up making a run-on sentence and failing epically at making complicated sentences. :failface:
God said:They're too many rules
They are doesn't qualify as there areui:
Assangha said:I am a comma Nazi. Seriously, I use way to many commas. Not going to lie. :3
If a comma is a BREAK in a sentence, using too many is serious ANNOYING to read, IMO.
It should be "seriously" annoying, you use an adverb not an adjective.ui: Put your failface on please. Also, there shouldn't be a comma before IMO. ui:
Yes there should be, and I meant seriouslymg: :bebe-pleure:
Because I'm breaking the sentence right before the last word, like so.
Coolman909 said:This is amazing!
I was left speechless, at the hilarity of this post.
God said:Commas confuse me sometimes. There are too many rules, I always end up making a run-on sentence and failing epically at making complicated sentences. :failface:
reyningsunshine said:God said:Commas confuse me sometimes. There are too many rules, I always end up making a run-on sentence and failing epically at making complicated sentences. :failface:
You comma splice'd. It's "...rules; I..." for future reference.
Seriously, you guys pretend to be grammar nazis but let that slide? I'm taking away all of your badges.
Oh, and Asshanga, he DOES need the comma. It's called a "run on sentence." His sentence can be broken down into two independent, both equipped with a predicate (verb) and a subject (noun), combined only with a conjunction
"Yes there should be, and I meant seriously"
In his first clause, "Yes there should be," the predicate is "should" and the noun is implied. In answering others, many subjects are "forgotten" and implied. In this case, the implied full clause (which is unnecessary) reads "Yes there should be a comma." In his second clause, "I meant seriously," the predicate is "meant" and the subject is "I." As these are not related closely enough but are still two independent clauses, a comma and a conjunction should be used to combine them into one sentence. It would be grammatically correct to substitute both comma and conjunction for a semicolon, but it would be a bad use of the semicolon as the flow of the sentence would be choppy at best.
I am the Queen of the Grammar Nazis. Do not argue with me on any of this.
Assangha said:reyningsunshine said:God said:Commas confuse me sometimes. There are too many rules, I always end up making a run-on sentence and failing epically at making complicated sentences. :failface:
You comma splice'd. It's "...rules; I..." for future reference.
Seriously, you guys pretend to be grammar nazis but let that slide? I'm taking away all of your badges.
Oh, and Asshanga, he DOES need the comma. It's called a "run on sentence." His sentence can be broken down into two independent, both equipped with a predicate (verb) and a subject (noun), combined only with a conjunction
"Yes there should be, and I meant seriously"
In his first clause, "Yes there should be," the predicate is "should" and the noun is implied. In answering others, many subjects are "forgotten" and implied. In this case, the implied full clause (which is unnecessary) reads "Yes there should be a comma." In his second clause, "I meant seriously," the predicate is "meant" and the subject is "I." As these are not related closely enough but are still two independent clauses, a comma and a conjunction should be used to combine them into one sentence. It would be grammatically correct to substitute both comma and conjunction for a semicolon, but it would be a bad use of the semicolon as the flow of the sentence would be choppy at best.
I am the Queen of the Grammar Nazis. Do not argue with me on any of this.
Hey bitch... STFU.
You didn't have to give a whole lesson about it and rub it in my face. -.-reyningsunshine said:God said:Commas confuse me sometimes. There are too many rules, I always end up making a run-on sentence and failing epically at making complicated sentences. :failface:
You comma splice'd. It's "...rules; I..." for future reference.
Seriously, you guys pretend to be grammar nazis but let that slide? I'm taking away all of your badges.
Oh, and Asshanga, he DOES need the comma. It's called a "run on sentence." His sentence can be broken down into two independent, both equipped with a predicate (verb) and a subject (noun), combined only with a conjunction
"Yes there should be, and I meant seriously"
In his first clause, "Yes there should be," the predicate is "should" and the noun is implied. In answering others, many subjects are "forgotten" and implied. In this case, the implied full clause (which is unnecessary) reads "Yes there should be a comma." In his second clause, "I meant seriously," the predicate is "meant" and the subject is "I." As these are not related closely enough but are still two independent clauses, a comma and a conjunction should be used to combine them into one sentence. It would be grammatically correct to substitute both comma and conjunction for a semicolon, but it would be a bad use of the semicolon as the flow of the sentence would be choppy at best.
I am the Queen of the Grammar Nazis. Do not argue with me on any of this.
reyningsunshine said:@God: I only mentioned that you comma splice'd. I gave the lesson to Asshanga about somebody else's post.
You forgot a comma in your second sentence, by the way. Oh, and about your signature...
God said:I forgot that comma on purpose to see if you would say something. You failed. *SMACK*
I didn't write that quote, find out who did and give him a lesson.
You're getting really annoying. Seriously. -.-reyningsunshine said:God said:I forgot that comma on purpose to see if you would say something. You failed. *SMACK*
I didn't write that quote, find out who did and give him a lesson.
TECHNICALLY I never corrected you. Just a lil protip.
And see, you keep comma splicing, and it's really annoying. Please learn to use a semicolon! It's your best friend!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?