• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

Group Suggestion.

Devour

Active Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2012
Posts
2,967
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
I think the co-leader of a group should have moderation control other wise it's pointless to even have a co-leader honestly. I see no problem with this and why it should be a problem.

@shade
@tyga
@doug
@pun
@"м¢ℓσνιη"
@"мasση"
@"GrƷƷd"
@hope
@woke
@teen
@sleep

How do you guys feel since your all group owners?
 

Nevermind

User is banned.
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Posts
5,632
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
I suggested this awhile back, and I support this idea.

Put their name in quotations to tag them.

@ " GrƷƷd " (remove the spaces)
 

Devour

Active Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2012
Posts
2,967
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Poop said:
What the fuck can a co-leader do now?
Click to expand...
All they can do is add and remove members.

Leader said:
I suggested this awhile back, and I support this idea.

Put their name in quotations to tag them.

@ " GrƷƷd " (remove the spaces)
Click to expand...
Well that is stupid, I don't why it does that..
 

Poop

Active Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Posts
920
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Devour said:
All they can do is add and remove members.

Well that is stupid, I don't why it does that..
Click to expand...


Oh lol. Well yeah I think they should have certain moderation tools, but not all. If they could do everything a leader could, what's the point in owning a group?
 

Devour

Active Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2012
Posts
2,967
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Poop said:
Oh lol. Well yeah I think they should have certain moderation tools, but not all. If they could do everything a leader could, what's the point in owning a group?
Click to expand...
I'd rather them have moderation control than able to edit the group roster honestly.
 

Doug

User is banned.
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Posts
1,323
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Devour said:
I think the co-leader of a group should have moderation control other wise it's pointless to even have a co-leader honestly. I see no problem with this and why it should be a problem.

-


How do you guys feel since your all group owners?
Click to expand...

Moderation would be nice, for now I can manage members and what not which is nice but I agree it's hard to help without being able to moderate.
 

Bump Bot

Active Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Posts
3,379
Reacts
18
Reputation
-1
Credits
275
I think this should be but I don't know. It's been suggested a couple of times.
 

Hollywood

Active Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Posts
1,727
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Yeah co-leader spot seems kinda pointless. I agree with you Devour.
 

Sleep

Discord : ClumsyLulz
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Posts
1,834
Reacts
5
Reputation
0
Credits
1,027
i don't want a co leader cuz its pointless js
 

Hitmarker

User is banned.
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Posts
1,417
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
I like this to a point, should give the overall owner of the usergroup to control what the co-leader can and can't do (such as delete posts, delete threads, stick threads, edit roster, etc).

So say @Devour could have his co-leader edit threads and shit instead of edit roster, as for Pun in my group would be able to do anything cus he's my nigga.
 

Woke

User is banned.
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Posts
654
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
I Honestly agree with this dude, It is pretty pointless only adding and/or removing members.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register