Has anyone noticed...

[Joshua_mybb_import21010]

That this member will eventually have more username changes than reputation?

And that's since he had requested to have his reputation reset.

 

[Deathcrow]

Yes, I have actually joked him else where about the number of times he has changed his username.

 

[Pro]

Wait ready, *neg 9's him*.

/Case closed.

 

[Michael]

There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.

 

[Adam]

There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.

There aren't any rules regarding what you can rep for other than the fact you cannot call someone a scammer with reputation without proof.

 

[Michael]

There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.

There aren't any rules regarding what you can rep for other than the fact you cannot call someone a scammer with reputation without proof.

I didn't quite understand the last part. Mate, if you gave 9 negative rep to someone for their username changes, I'm sure that's some-what of abuse. Especially if they're semi-active.

 

[Pro]

There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.

All reputation is in fact "un-needed" and is merely a function of the forum brought on by one users opinion of another. No rules state that I am not free to give reputation to a member based upon something that I dislike about them.

 

[Michael]

There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.

All reputation is in fact "un-needed" and is merely a function of the forum brought on by one users opinion of another. No rules state that I am not free to give reputation to a member based upon something that I dislike about them.

We both know you don't dislike him for that particular reason, and you're going to state 'you do' when you don't. If he came online and saw that neg, do you think he'd be happy? If I gave you a neg right now saying 'I don't like you because your name has 3 letters in it'.

I'm sure you wouldn't be happy, and you'd seek revenge because that's how idiotic people are nowadays. Hating someone for 73 username changes isn't an opinion, it's a stupid reason to give reputation to someone, even though he doesn't deserve it.

 

[Pro]

We both know you don't dislike him for that particular reason, and you're going to state 'you do' when you don't. If he came online and saw that neg, do you think he'd be happy? If I gave you a neg right now saying 'I don't like you because your name has 3 letters in it'.

I'm sure you wouldn't be happy, and you'd seek revenge because that's how idiotic people are nowadays. Hating someone for 73 username changes isn't an opinion, it's a stupid reason to give reputation to someone, even though he doesn't deserve it.

I do particularly hate that user for having changed his username so many times and would like to give Josh a shout out for bringing it to my attention. Who gives a shit it's a fucking number.

If I gave you a neg right now saying 'I don't like you because your name has 3 letters in it'.I'm sure you wouldn't be happy, and you'd seek revenge because that's how idiotic people are nowadays.

We shall see if the pot calls the kettle black my friend.

 

[Michael]

We both know you don't dislike him for that particular reason, and you're going to state 'you do' when you don't. If he came online and saw that neg, do you think he'd be happy? If I gave you a neg right now saying 'I don't like you because your name has 3 letters in it'.

I'm sure you wouldn't be happy, and you'd seek revenge because that's how idiotic people are nowadays. Hating someone for 73 username changes isn't an opinion, it's a stupid reason to give reputation to someone, even though he doesn't deserve it.

I do particularly hate that user for having changed his username so many times and would like to give Josh a shout out for bringing it to my attention. Who gives a shit it's a fucking number.

Cute of you to give me that 9. So you're saying it to yourself, you only did it because Josh showed you it. If he didn't make this thread, you wouldn't even know who he is. I agree it's a number, but don't abuse that number.

 

[Pro]

Cute of you to give me that 9. So you're saying it to yourself, you only did it because Josh showed you it. If he didn't make this thread, you wouldn't even know who he is. I agree it's a number, but don't abuse that number.

I'm stating that Josh brought the issue to my attention.


Would you know children were starving in Africa unless someone brought it to your attention?

 

[Michael]

Cute of you to give me that 9. So you're saying it to yourself, you only did it because Josh showed you it. If he didn't make this thread, you wouldn't even know who he is. I agree it's a number, but don't abuse that number.

I'm stating that Josh brought the issue to my attention.


Would you know children were starving in Africa unless someone brought it to your attention?

The thing is I already know about starving kids in Africa, I do not give a fuck about this Diesel guy, but you shouldn't be giving false reps. Josh did bring the issue to your attention, but if he didn't? Boom, you wouldn't even know who the guy was.

 

[Adam]

There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.

There aren't any rules regarding what you can rep for other than the fact you cannot call someone a scammer with reputation without proof.

I didn't quite understand the last part. Mate, if you gave 9 negative rep to someone for their username changes, I'm sure that's some-what of abuse. Especially if they're semi-active.

If I gave @"Joshua" a -9 stating "This user is a scammer. Deal with caution" and I didn't have proof to back it up it would be abuse. It would hurt his "cred" and trust. If I -9'd him for being stupid you could call that abuse but it doesn't hurt him in any real way.

 

[Pro]

The thing is I already know about starving kids in Africa, I do not give a f*ck about this Diesel guy, but you shouldn't be giving false reps. Josh did bring the issue to your attention, but if he didn't? Boom, you wouldn't even know who the guy was.

So your basing your argument on the fact that I am not allowed to give reputation for new issues I have with users, and should rather pretend I didn't see that he changed his name 73 times.

It seems like you are assuming a lot about me which is horrible politics. What's fact is fact and what's not is hearsay my friend.

 

[Michael]

There aren't any rules regarding what you can rep for other than the fact you cannot call someone a scammer with reputation without proof.

I didn't quite understand the last part. Mate, if you gave 9 negative rep to someone for their username changes, I'm sure that's some-what of abuse. Especially if they're semi-active.

If I gave @"Joshua" a -9 stating "This user is a scammer. Deal with caution" and I didn't have proof to back it up it would be abuse. It would hurt his "cred" and trust. If I -9'd him for being stupid you could call that abuse but it doesn't hurt him in any real way.

You're both so stupid. JOSH created this thread just to let us know, for some reason that this user has more name changes then rep. That is true, but Pro was idiotic and stupid enough to give him a -9 for a completely and utterly false reason.

http://puu.sh/1Nw8m

Please tell me, Pro, you don't dislike him. You're saying this to backup your retarded point.

 

[Pro]

I didn't quite understand the last part. Mate, if you gave 9 negative rep to someone for their username changes, I'm sure that's some-what of abuse. Especially if they're semi-active.

If I gave @"Joshua" a -9 stating "This user is a scammer. Deal with caution" and I didn't have proof to back it up it would be abuse. It would hurt his "cred" and trust. If I -9'd him for being stupid you could call that abuse but it doesn't hurt him in any real way.

You're both so stupid. JOSH created this thread just to let us know, for some reason that this user has more name changes then rep. That is true, but Pro was idiotic and stupid enough to give him a -9 for a completely and utterly false reason.

http://puu.sh/1Nw8m

Please tell me, Pro, you don't dislike him. You're saying this to backup your retarded point.

Fancy screenshot you got there. I like to get creative with my rep's, this instance was a clear subliminal message that I think he's a fag for changing his name 73 times.

Oh and what exactly does this mean?

http://d.pr/i/3Sdn

 

[Michael]

If I gave @"Joshua" a -9 stating "This user is a scammer. Deal with caution" and I didn't have proof to back it up it would be abuse. It would hurt his "cred" and trust. If I -9'd him for being stupid you could call that abuse but it doesn't hurt him in any real way.

You're both so stupid. JOSH created this thread just to let us know, for some reason that this user has more name changes then rep. That is true, but Pro was idiotic and stupid enough to give him a -9 for a completely and utterly false reason.

http://puu.sh/1Nw8m

Please tell me, Pro, you don't dislike him. You're saying this to backup your retarded point.

Fancy screenshot you got there. I like to get creative with my rep's, this instance was a clear subliminal message that I think he's a fag for changing his name 73 times.

Oh and what exactly does this mean?

http://d.pr/i/3Sdn

It means I'm going to take this matter to Glen because you don't learn your lesson. You could've dropped it, but you have negged him about 3-4 times whilst I keep deleting them. I'll speak to him tonight.

PS: If you neg him for that reason again, I'll give you a 2 day limit.

 

[Pro]

It means I'm going to take this matter to Glen because you don't learn your lesson. You could've dropped it, but you have negged him about 3-4 times whilst I keep deleting them. I'll speak to him tonight.

PS: If you neg him for that reason again, I'll give you a 2 day limit.

Haha Glen will find this rather humorous and will hopefully reconsider the age requirement for his staff.

I have every right to neg him as backed up by Adam, and the Rungear.net rules written by Glen himself.

If you limit me, this is going to blow up in your face.

 

[Michael]

It means I'm going to take this matter to Glen because you don't learn your lesson. You could've dropped it, but you have negged him about 3-4 times whilst I keep deleting them. I'll speak to him tonight.

PS: If you neg him for that reason again, I'll give you a 2 day limit.

Haha Glen will find this rather humorous and will hopefully reconsider the age requirement for his staff.

I have every right to neg him as backed up by Adam, and the Rungear.net rules written by Glen himself.

If you limit me, this is going to blow up in your face.

Oh really now? Let's see about that.

 

[Pro]

Oh really now? Let's see about that.

This post would have been a lot cooler if other Moderators didn't think you were an idiot and left me banned:kiss: