Michael said:There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.
Adam said:Michael said:There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.
There aren't any rules regarding what you can rep for other than the fact you cannot call someone a scammer with reputation without proof.
Michael said:There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.
Pro said:Michael said:There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.
All reputation is in fact "un-needed" and is merely a function of the forum brought on by one users opinion of another. No rules state that I am not free to give reputation to a member based upon something that I dislike about them.
I do particularly hate that user for having changed his username so many times and would like to give Josh a shout out for bringing it to my attention. Who gives a shit it's a fucking number.Michael said:We both know you don't dislike him for that particular reason, and you're going to state 'you do' when you don't. If he came online and saw that neg, do you think he'd be happy? If I gave you a neg right now saying 'I don't like you because your name has 3 letters in it'.
I'm sure you wouldn't be happy, and you'd seek revenge because that's how idiotic people are nowadays. Hating someone for 73 username changes isn't an opinion, it's a stupid reason to give reputation to someone, even though he doesn't deserve it.
Michael said:If I gave you a neg right now saying 'I don't like you because your name has 3 letters in it'.I'm sure you wouldn't be happy, and you'd seek revenge because that's how idiotic people are nowadays.
Pro said:I do particularly hate that user for having changed his username so many times and would like to give Josh a shout out for bringing it to my attention. Who gives a shit it's a fucking number.Michael said:We both know you don't dislike him for that particular reason, and you're going to state 'you do' when you don't. If he came online and saw that neg, do you think he'd be happy? If I gave you a neg right now saying 'I don't like you because your name has 3 letters in it'.
I'm sure you wouldn't be happy, and you'd seek revenge because that's how idiotic people are nowadays. Hating someone for 73 username changes isn't an opinion, it's a stupid reason to give reputation to someone, even though he doesn't deserve it.
Michael said:Cute of you to give me that 9. So you're saying it to yourself, you only did it because Josh showed you it. If he didn't make this thread, you wouldn't even know who he is. I agree it's a number, but don't abuse that number.
Pro said:Michael said:Cute of you to give me that 9. So you're saying it to yourself, you only did it because Josh showed you it. If he didn't make this thread, you wouldn't even know who he is. I agree it's a number, but don't abuse that number.
I'm stating that Josh brought the issue to my attention.
Would you know children were starving in Africa unless someone brought it to your attention?
If I gave @"Joshua" a -9 stating "This user is a scammer. Deal with caution" and I didn't have proof to back it up it would be abuse. It would hurt his "cred" and trust. If I -9'd him for being stupid you could call that abuse but it doesn't hurt him in any real way.Michael said:Adam said:Michael said:There's already been a case of staff needing to warn somebody. Don't give un-needed reputation, it counts as abuse. Especially a -9 Negative.
There aren't any rules regarding what you can rep for other than the fact you cannot call someone a scammer with reputation without proof.
I didn't quite understand the last part. Mate, if you gave 9 negative rep to someone for their username changes, I'm sure that's some-what of abuse. Especially if they're semi-active.
Michael said:The thing is I already know about starving kids in Africa, I do not give a f*ck about this Diesel guy, but you shouldn't be giving false reps. Josh did bring the issue to your attention, but if he didn't? Boom, you wouldn't even know who the guy was.
Adam said:If I gave @"Joshua" a -9 stating "This user is a scammer. Deal with caution" and I didn't have proof to back it up it would be abuse. It would hurt his "cred" and trust. If I -9'd him for being stupid you could call that abuse but it doesn't hurt him in any real way.Michael said:Adam said:There aren't any rules regarding what you can rep for other than the fact you cannot call someone a scammer with reputation without proof.
I didn't quite understand the last part. Mate, if you gave 9 negative rep to someone for their username changes, I'm sure that's some-what of abuse. Especially if they're semi-active.
Michael said:Adam said:If I gave @"Joshua" a -9 stating "This user is a scammer. Deal with caution" and I didn't have proof to back it up it would be abuse. It would hurt his "cred" and trust. If I -9'd him for being stupid you could call that abuse but it doesn't hurt him in any real way.Michael said:I didn't quite understand the last part. Mate, if you gave 9 negative rep to someone for their username changes, I'm sure that's some-what of abuse. Especially if they're semi-active.
You're both so stupid. JOSH created this thread just to let us know, for some reason that this user has more name changes then rep. That is true, but Pro was idiotic and stupid enough to give him a -9 for a completely and utterly false reason.
http://puu.sh/1Nw8m
Please tell me, Pro, you don't dislike him. You're saying this to backup your retarded point.
Pro said:Michael said:Adam said:If I gave @"Joshua" a -9 stating "This user is a scammer. Deal with caution" and I didn't have proof to back it up it would be abuse. It would hurt his "cred" and trust. If I -9'd him for being stupid you could call that abuse but it doesn't hurt him in any real way.
You're both so stupid. JOSH created this thread just to let us know, for some reason that this user has more name changes then rep. That is true, but Pro was idiotic and stupid enough to give him a -9 for a completely and utterly false reason.
http://puu.sh/1Nw8m
Please tell me, Pro, you don't dislike him. You're saying this to backup your retarded point.
Fancy screenshot you got there. I like to get creative with my rep's, this instance was a clear subliminal message that I think he's a fag for changing his name 73 times.
Oh and what exactly does this mean?
http://d.pr/i/3Sdn
Michael said:It means I'm going to take this matter to Glen because you don't learn your lesson. You could've dropped it, but you have negged him about 3-4 times whilst I keep deleting them. I'll speak to him tonight.
PS: If you neg him for that reason again, I'll give you a 2 day limit.
Pro said:Michael said:It means I'm going to take this matter to Glen because you don't learn your lesson. You could've dropped it, but you have negged him about 3-4 times whilst I keep deleting them. I'll speak to him tonight.
PS: If you neg him for that reason again, I'll give you a 2 day limit.
Haha Glen will find this rather humorous and will hopefully reconsider the age requirement for his staff.
I have every right to neg him as backed up by Adam, and the Rungear.net rules written by Glen himself.
If you limit me, this is going to blow up in your face.
Michael said:Oh really now? Let's see about that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?