Hmm weird obama.

[Narc]

Well some of you may know that there was once again another shooting, http://video.foxnews.com/v/2555052454001/
I've noticed that everytime a shooting happens, like last friday at LAX. And many other times that Obama has been held in a bad position before it happens.
He gets pinned in a bad situation and then all of the sudden something bad happens (like a shooting). I am not a kook thinking obama is hitler but I just noticed it and it seems a little weird.
Is the GOV getting him out of a bad situation ?

 

[Jamil]

He has been using uh and studdering in his latest speeches alot.

 

[Cann!bal]

Oh please; don't go all conspiracy theory. You sound silly.

There is absolutely no correlation.

 

[Narc]

Oh please; don't go all conspiracy theory. You sound silly.

There is absolutely no correlation.

Thats not what I was doing at all. It just was noticed by me.

 

[Solar]

He has been using uh and studdering in his latest speeches alot.

Did you just notice that, man?

 

[Summon]

Oh please; don't go all conspiracy theory. You sound silly.

There is absolutely no correlation.

I clicked the kudos button on accident. Oops.

Having an idea that doesn't align with what the mainstream media says isn't always crazy. I'm not necessarily saying that about this example but your post was much more general.

 

[Cann!bal]

Having an idea that doesn't align with what the mainstream media says isn't always crazy. I'm not necessarily saying that about this example but your post was much more general.

Blatantly, however, mainstream media had nothing to do with my post -- it was all about rationality and logic. When one makes an irrational and illogical claim substantiated by unreliable evidence such as the aforementioned, labeling them as silly is totally justified. The evidence is so poor there's essentially no real debate until more firm evidence is provided. His entire argument is based off a hunch initiated by several coincidences he observed.

 

[Narc]

Blatantly, however, mainstream media had nothing to do with my post -- it was all about rationality and logic. When one makes an irrational and illogical claim substantiated by unreliable evidence such as the aforementioned, labeling them as silly is totally justified. The evidence is so poor there's essentially no real debate until more firm evidence is provided. His entire argument is based off a hunch initiated by several coincidences he observed.

Taking it way out of context, I was just making a observation.

 

[Sleep]

that my good sir is racist and we just blame the Illuminati.

 

[Cann!bal]

Taking it way out of context, I was just making a observation.

I say otherwise. I simply elaborated how there is essentially no real debate here due to such poor evidence.