Incest

Neptune · Oct 20, 2013

Many people think it's extremely disgusting to have sex with another family member. I think there's nothing wrong with it, unless it's your grandma, grandpa, etc. I'd like to hear what you people think. Don't be the normal person and be like "Ew dude, that's disgusting, why would you ever think that?". I want you all to be completely honest.

Threat · Oct 20, 2013

Well due to the fact that inbreeding causes severe birth deformities, and the general awkwardness of having to see that family member again, and the fact that I find it revolting, I would never even consider doing it.

Medical · Oct 20, 2013

On complete honesty I find nothing wrong with having sex with your sister, brother, cousin, THROUGH LAW. But I do find it wrong through blood. Not because of the cliché "EW, GROSS" but because if you happen to get your family member pregnant the baby is more than 90% likely to come out with birth defects such as asbergers or Down syndrome. That is not fair (in my eyes) to the child to have to come into the world with these defects.

Nevermind · Oct 20, 2013

Well, considering that it's illegal, causes birth defects, and separates you from society, I think there is no place in our society for it. The only time it has been utilized recently has been in the times of monarchies, to keep the bloodline. That still caused physical problems to the descendants of those who participated in this act. It is pointless and there is really no logical reason why one should even consider incest. If you really want to have sex that bad, find a prostitute.

Spiderman · Oct 20, 2013

In my honest opinion, having sex with any of your family members is pretty disturbing

Medical · Oct 20, 2013

Leader said:
Well, considering that it's illegal, causes birth defects, and separates you from society, I think there is no place in our society for it. The only time it has been utilized recently has been in the times of monarchies, to keep the bloodline. That still caused physical problems to the descendants of those who participated in this act. It is pointless and there is really no logical reason why one should even consider incest. If you really want to have sex that bad, find a prostitute.

Very true for example Egyptian Leader Tutankhamun

scoop · Oct 20, 2013

Threat said:
Well due to the fact that inbreeding causes severe birth deformities, and the general awkwardness of having to see that family member again, and the fact that I find it revolting, I would never even consider doing it.

yeah, i agree with threat. i couldn't posibly think of doing one of my sis' ._.

Habs · Oct 21, 2013

I would have to say that incest is wrong.
Why would you not think so? It causes birth defects and deformities.

Mike · Oct 21, 2013

I just think it is morally fucked up besides that its whatever.

Falixus · Oct 21, 2013

Some reasons incest should not be practiced:
*Your child will be defected.
*It will tear your family apart if someone finds out.
Just don't do it. There's millions of girls/guys your age.

Poop · Oct 21, 2013

Thats just fucked up having sex with your sister. And after that, your child will be fucked up for life. Thats just cruel as fuck lol

Majestic · Oct 21, 2013

I'm going to be brutally honest here.. that shit is disgusting, disturbing, and just weird.

Cannabis · Oct 21, 2013

Threat said:
Well due to the fact that inbreeding causes severe birth deformities, and the general awkwardness of having to see that family member again, and the fact that I find it revolting, I would never even consider doing it.

That's true only after many a generation of inbreeding. Simple genetic principle.

HUNNID · Oct 21, 2013

If you believe in Jesus Christ or Christianity or any type of religion that started out with 2 people then you have to believe that it is okay to inbred.

Nevermind · Oct 21, 2013

xSlatzy said:
If you believe in Jesus Christ or Christianity or any type of religion that started out with 2 people then you have to believe that it is okay to inbred.

That is a generalization and makes no sense. I'm an atheist, first of all. If you think about it, there was a very limited amount of homo-sapiens that had to start out the human population. This was way back when humans weren't intelligent enough to understand the effects of inbreeding. The human population had to start out with inbreeding, otherwise there would be no way for the population to grow. Plus, you can't just tell people what they believe in. It doesn't work that way.

Cann!bal · Oct 21, 2013

Leader said:
That is a generalization and makes no sense. I'm an atheist, first of all. If you think about it, there had to be one man and one woman to start out the human population. This was way back when humans weren't intelligent enough to understand what inbreeding was, and the effects it had. The world had to start out with inbreeding, otherwise there would be no way for the population to grow. Plus, you can't just tell people what they believe in. It doesn't work that way.

Your understanding of evolution is quite poor. There were no first humans. There is no definitive borderline of our hominid species' genesis; remember it takes millennias upon millennias for such distinctive change to occur. They were aware of what incest was, however, were not aware of the medical problems that may occur. The world did not start with inbreeding, it started with a molecule of life much much less complex than a cell. The ones apart of the singularity of life procreated asexually, not sexually. It's called indoctrination, mate. It unfortunately works that way.

Nevermind · Oct 21, 2013

Cann!bal said:
Your understanding of evolution is quite poor. There were no first humans. There is no definitive borderline of our hominid species' genesis; remember it takes millennias upon millennias for such distinctive change to occur. They were aware of what incest was, however, were not aware of the medical problems that may occur. The world did not start with inbreeding, it started with a molecule of life much much less complex than a cell. The ones apart of the singularity of life procreated asexually, not sexually. It's called indoctrination, mate. It unfortunately works that way.

I was saying that there was once a limited amount a homosapiens at a certain point in time. They existed in small amounts and would have to breed with other homosapiens related to them. I was referring to humans in my post, not life in general. I guess I could have made that more clear.

Cann!bal · Oct 22, 2013

I fail to see the logic that justifies incest as truly erroneous. Yes, it can result in deformities and defects. However, since when has incest implied that there will be a pregnancy? It simply doesn't imply that; it only implies there will be sexual relations between the two, nothing more, nothing less. I see no logical error in two adult relatives having consensual intercourse with contraception.

Homosexuality, incest, and pedophilia are society's sexual taboos and wrongdoings. In essentially every society these are ingrained taboos and wrongdoings. We are slowly, although, gradually realizing there is no valid logic to dictate them as truly erroneous. These debates are to be addressed with logic, not customary principles and unsubstantiated opinions.

Gor · Oct 22, 2013

Cann!bal said:
I fail to see the logic that justifies incest as truly erroneous. Yes, it can result in deformities and defects. However, since when has incest implied that there will be a pregnancy? It simply doesn't imply that; it only implies there will be sexual relations between the two, nothing more, nothing less. I see no logical error in two adult relatives having consensual intercourse with contraception.

Homosexuality, incest, and pedophilia are society's sexual taboos and wrongdoings. In essentially every society these are ingrained taboos and wrongdoings. We are slowly, although, gradually realizing there is no valid logic to dictate them as truly erroneous. These debates are to be addressed with logic, not customary principles and unsubstantiated opinions.

You sir are the most thoughtful person on FK I never saw it that way

biasa199 · Oct 22, 2013

Technically, we all came from a common ancestor in Taiwan (major port city) in about 3,000 BC. Looking at those statistics, we are all 50th cousins with one another (at most). This would not have happened without incest.. quite a LOT of incest.

If you are in the same country as somebody and have the same skin color, chances are, you are at most 10th cousins with each other.

Incest

User is banned.

User is banned.

User is banned.

User is banned.

Active Member

User is banned.

User is banned.

User is banned.

User is banned.

Onyx user!

Active Member

Member

Onyx user!

User is banned.

User is banned.

Power member.

User is banned.

Power member.

Washed IG Plug

User is banned.

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency