This is from another site. I enjoyed the thread and comments pertaining, so I will post this here.
Scenario:
A Christian boy lives in a dangerous side of down and is walking along a road. He happened to be wearing a 'wrong colored' shirt when a group of gang members comes around the corner carrying guns.
Outcome #1:
The group of gang members fire at the boy. Every single bullet misses. Clearly this was god protecting him, so god is good.
Outcome #2:
They fire at the boy and hit him a couple of times, but the bullets miss every major organ and artery. Clearly this was god keeping him alive and not permanently harmed, so god is good.
Outcome #3:
They fire at the boy hitting him several times. He is paralyzed from the waist down and has lasting brain damage. However, god kept him alive because he has more plans for the boy, so god is good.
Outcome #4:
They fire at the boy several times and he bleeds to death at the scene. God decided it was his time to die and took him to a better place, so god is good.
The point is this, Christian (among other theists) use any and everything as evidence for their god. They refuse to understand that everyone is subject to others' free will as well as universal entropy and god doesn't intervene in everything that happens. It's a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy as well as begging the question (assuming that god exists in the first place).
Discuss please.
Scenario:
A Christian boy lives in a dangerous side of down and is walking along a road. He happened to be wearing a 'wrong colored' shirt when a group of gang members comes around the corner carrying guns.
Outcome #1:
The group of gang members fire at the boy. Every single bullet misses. Clearly this was god protecting him, so god is good.
Outcome #2:
They fire at the boy and hit him a couple of times, but the bullets miss every major organ and artery. Clearly this was god keeping him alive and not permanently harmed, so god is good.
Outcome #3:
They fire at the boy hitting him several times. He is paralyzed from the waist down and has lasting brain damage. However, god kept him alive because he has more plans for the boy, so god is good.
Outcome #4:
They fire at the boy several times and he bleeds to death at the scene. God decided it was his time to die and took him to a better place, so god is good.
The point is this, Christian (among other theists) use any and everything as evidence for their god. They refuse to understand that everyone is subject to others' free will as well as universal entropy and god doesn't intervene in everything that happens. It's a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy as well as begging the question (assuming that god exists in the first place).
Discuss please.