All Day Win said:eXero said:All Day Win said:I'm like the nicest guy
Just because you may be the nicest guy doesn't mean you don't show favoritism.
I don't but ok?
Mike said:Sick of myself. As easy as that. Sick of everything.
George said:Everybody needs to chill, If 65%+ of the forum turn round and say staff are corrupt, Then you don't need new staf.. You need to know WHY they think staff are corrupt and resolve the issue.
Danger Close said:George said:Everybody needs to chill, If 65%+ of the forum turn round and say staff are corrupt, Then you don't need new staf.. You need to know WHY they think staff are corrupt and resolve the issue.
I think it's been tried many of times before.
eXero said:Yeah there are no problems with you Mike, it's ADW that has the most complaints.
eXero said:What happens when a staff really is corrupt though? Why waste all that time and effort?
George said:Danger Close said:George said:Everybody needs to chill, If 65%+ of the forum turn round and say staff are corrupt, Then you don't need new staf.. You need to know WHY they think staff are corrupt and resolve the issue.
I think it's been tried many of times before.
I know this would be a lot of work, But TE PM's everybody, Asking for reasons.. He takes them into account, Gets staff's PoV, Comes to a reasonable decision, Goes from there.
Relapse said:Justin said:Staff should have an option while creating a thread to pick who can post on it, so this doesn't happen.
If they don't want people to post than they why would they post it publicly? If its a problem they can still delete posts
Danger Close said:George said:Danger Close said:I think it's been tried many of times before.
I know this would be a lot of work, But TE PM's everybody, Asking for reasons.. He takes them into account, Gets staff's PoV, Comes to a reasonable decision, Goes from there.
What's wrong with that?
At-least it'll be the community taking part.
George said:Danger Close said:George said:I know this would be a lot of work, But TE PM's everybody, Asking for reasons.. He takes them into account, Gets staff's PoV, Comes to a reasonable decision, Goes from there.
What's wrong with that?
At-least it'll be the community taking part.
True.. He'd need somebody else who doesn't take sides aswell though.. So Mike/Oxide/Another decent member.
Danger Close said:George said:Danger Close said:What's wrong with that?
At-least it'll be the community taking part.
True.. He'd need somebody else who doesn't take sides aswell though.. So Mike/Oxide/Another decent member.
Well, it'd obviously be Mike, if he'd want to take part.
But hey, I say you should serve a limited time as a staff member.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?