Bones said:I agree with you. I honestly don't see why it's such a shocker that a person raised in the deep south in the bible belt in the 60's is homophobic (or racist in the case of Paula Deen)
Bones said:I know but people are acting as if he is and are overreacting
California said:Exactly, but thats how it is i guess.
Question to pro gays: Whats the difference between the US being pro Gay ? When in the middle east almost in entirety is Pro - young marriage ( Marrying little kids as old as 9 and getting them pregnant)?
I don't approve of either.
Leader said:Gay people are humans, too. They should be fully supported in every way, no matter what. There is nothing else to it.
California said:Leader stop actin like were making gays slaves.
Hollywood said:Yeah people need to chill. People are saying Macklemore is going to win every grammy this year just cause he supports gay marriage and made a song about it. And if he does then smh lol.
California said:Exactly, but thats how it is i guess.
Question to pro gays: Whats the difference between the US being pro Gay ? When in the middle east almost in entirety is Pro - young marriage ( Marrying little kids as old as 9 and getting them pregnant)?
I don't approve of either.
8Fap=DongD~~~ said:You mean as YOUNG as 9. lmao if 9 was the cap, we'd REALLY have an issue here.
But yeah, the world's all fucked up. I'm not a redneck, but I completely accept the Robinsons and what they're about. What's the big fuckin deal? Your subject title speaks volumes. Liberal media is forcing the gay agenda down our throats and I'm honestly getting sick of it. The network that took over G4TV shows like 50% gays on their show, like that's an actual fucking percentage. 4% of the world is gay. 15% of the world is secular/atheist. That leaves 96% straights and 85% believers. I don't understand how the liberal media has made it seem like the vast majority of mankind is against Phil Robinson, because it's the polar opposite of that. I know many liberal Democrats (myself included) and I fully support the rights of all people, but not at the cost of our constitutional rights. The world isn't as black and white as they want it to seem, though. I know a lot of Democrats who oppose gay marriage. It's the labels that are ruining the world's view of us.
And inb4 Cann!bal or someone chimes in against Christians; People like this represent the minority of Christians. I know some of the younger, more religious people I know and they have many gay friends and fully accept them and support their equality. This is NOT a religious issue so much as it's the liberal media networks trying to force feed gay culture down our fucking throats..
Cann!bal said:I think Phil Robertson's suspension was unjust. (However, I think the whole suspension was probably a ratings stunt anyways. They're now more popular than ever now.) He should have never received a temporary suspension for voicing his beliefs. It contradicts his rights, as an American citizen. However, if his network would have permanently shunned him, I would have understood, because it's well within their rights to not want an ignorant bigot to represent them.
That question was articulated poorly, however, I'll attempt answer it to the best of my abilities.
Firstly, the entirety of the Middle East is not pro-adolescent marriage and sex.
The Middle East is a chiefly impoverished and ignorant world, and activism is looked down upon. Their laws and guidelines are dictated by their religious and traditional principles and values. Hence, ignorance reigns. However, in America, we are an educated and informed world. Hence, being an ignorant bigot in America, especially when famous, will consequentially have an adverse response. Not very surprisingly, Phil Robertson is from the Bible Belt, America's most ill educated and uninformed sector.
(I'm against arranged marriages and adolescent marriages because there's ill consent. A youth is too young physically and mentally to be sexually active. A child's and a parent's consent to an adolescent marriage is invalid.)
I'm not against Christians, I'm against religion. There's a major distinction to be made there. It's the actions and beliefs of the religious I detest, henceforth, it doesn't matter if they represent the minority of Christians.
Today's youth is so secular and protestant, that it's somewhat fallacious to even call them by their religious labels, since they follow an insignificantly trivial amount of what their scripture dictates. They're more secular than religious. No one follows the scripture to the core.
This is indeed a religious issue. This anti-homosexual bigotry is of fault of religion. There would be essentially no intolerance of homosexuals if it was not dictated in religious scripture. Religion is the root and justification of all things wrong.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?