Userbars aren't the problem. I'm happy to change those if Philly agrees, it's the actual MyBB plugin features that I'm drawing blanks on.Shift said:A new user bar should be easy as it doesn't require too much knowledge to implement compared to a security feature or such.
Raptor said:Userbars aren't the problem. I'm happy to change those if Philly agrees, it's the actual MyBB plugin features that I'm drawing blanks on.
Beam said:I personally love the userbars and would not be disappointed if they never changed.
I really respect the fact that Jason came out and did this, and Astro is now offering his services to the site in order to improve it. I have had many of these same suggestions crawling around in my brain, but I was never sure how to bring the conflict at hand to the table. It always seemed that those who spoke out had their accounts terminated, and I really like the community we have here. We just need to work together towards a common goal and communicate rather than bitch and moan.Astro said:I stand by everything Jason has said. When Power+ became inflated with buy-in users, it lost its prestige. Instead of tightening the requirements to uphold its value, we introduced Supporters. While a subscription based upgrade is a cool idea, it never really went anywhere - the promised ongoing features were never implemented and it pretty much died out. So next came Investors, a group that promised profits from the site and more exclusive ongoing features. Not only does it look unattractive in every way, (hideous font and userbar) but barely any of the initial features that were promised ended up lasting, and it just became an extremely expensive buy-in.
We seriously need a revamp of the upgrade system, and I'm willing to help out with graphics if that's what is needed.
hit up @seven about investors please, man..Astro said:I stand by everything Jason has said. When Power+ became inflated with buy-in users, it lost its prestige. Instead of tightening the requirements to uphold its value, we introduced Supporters. While a subscription based upgrade is a cool idea, it never really went anywhere - the promised ongoing features were never implemented and it pretty much died out. So next came Investors, a group that promised profits from the site and more exclusive ongoing features. Not only does it look unattractive in every way, (hideous font and userbar) but barely any of the initial features that were promised ended up lasting, and it just became an extremely expensive buy-in.
We seriously need a revamp of the upgrade system, and I'm willing to help out with graphics if that's what is needed.
Yeah I guess it's kind of damage limitation now. Lets see what happens I guess.jason said:Thanks for the contribution, @"Hobbs". You and I seem to see eye to eye on most topics, which is a rarity in itself. @Raptor genuinely seems interested in seeking improvement, so I hope our feedback does not go ignored and we see the changes that we drastically need. All of your points are valid, but I cannot seem to agree anymore with lowering the transfer fee for awards. It is a shame to see awards sell for less then the transfer fee. It makes no sense. That is what happens when you have an absurd amount of user-owned awards.
Killer Turtle said:You think Philly gives a fuck about anyone's opinion on the site? All he cares about is making that money
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?