• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

My Siggy Gallery

๖ۣۜHax.

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
bo7fu.png


hoVqU.png


9e1mC.png


y1Fg7.png


dEM58.png


bUa3R.png


uIWRC.png


Yup, i love that type of font, its called Sophomore Yearbook.
I cant stop usingit D:
 

EAF

Active Member
Reputation
0
RE: New :D

It looks pretty decent, not to offend you in any way, but I'd work on blending a little more.
 

Fusion

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
RE: New :D

Maybe change the font, other than that, it's pretty good
 

Relapse

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
RE: New :D

That's pretty cool, you should make me one :D
 

eXero

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
RE: New :D

It's alright to be honest. It is missing something important, but I can't quite put my finger on what exactly that is.
 

๖ۣۜHax.

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
RE: New :D

Relapse said:
That's pretty cool, you should make me one :D
@[Relapse] No Problem, just pm me with a cool render.
Justin said:
the background looks TOO generic.
@[Justin] Is that good or bad?

eXero said:
It's alright to be honest. It is missing something important, but I can't quite put my finger on what exactly that is.
@[eXero] Hitme up when you know :)
 

Manatee

Active Member
Reputation
0
RE: New :D

It's not that it's bad, it's just that it need a better background. I see backgrounds like this all the time.
 

๖ۣۜHax.

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
RE: New :D

Justin said:
It's not that it's bad, it's just that it need a better background. I see backgrounds like this all the time.

@[Justin] Erm, i honestly doubt that you've seen this background unless you've seen the whole render in a signature before...
The Background is made of the signature and smudged.
 

Manatee

Active Member
Reputation
0
RE: New :D

๖ۣۜHax. said:
Justin said:
It's not that it's bad, it's just that it need a better background. I see backgrounds like this all the time.

@[Justin] Erm, i honestly doubt that you've seen this background unless you've seen the whole render in a signature before...
The Background is made of the signature and smudged.

I didn't mean it like that, I ment i've seen people do that technique so many times before. I'm not even saying it's bad, it looks cool. (The text is whack.) but, i guess it's better than whatever I can do. That's why I stick to transparent signatures now.
 

Nathan

User is banned.
Reputation
0
None of these signatures show depth, a valid lighting source, flow, etc.
The text takes away too much attention from the real focal point, not to mention you've overused the text.
The border on the third one is way too bright and catches to much attention.


http://worldofsignatures.com/wp-con...tutorials/Burst_Tag_Tutorial_by_Vasco_gfx.png
http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs38/f/2008/334/c/4/Flow_Tutorial__Signature_by_FluidStudios.png
http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2010/066/e/b/Sakai__s_Depth_Tutorial_by_CuzzinSmudge.png
http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs42/f/2009/059/7/2/TIMEshift_Tutorial_by_iBatz.jpg
 

eXero

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
The second has some fake stuff.

And, not trying to hurt your feelings but the fourth one is wretched.
 

Techno

User is banned.
Reputation
0
The one's that I like the most are the Second and Last one, they seem like your best work.


All I can say is maybe change the font up a bit.


You don't wanna bring attention to the text, in these you are, you want attention to the render.
 
Top