1. Respond once finished testingPrintLn said:I'm not interested in buying but let me ask the important questions for reference.
- How quick is it? How many per second average (after an hour).
- Why is the IG checker considered "glitchy"? What problems does it have?
- The entire thing is $1. People are willing to pay more than that just for an IG checker. Why did you decide to charge only $1?
- Do you actually expect anyone to follow your "Terms of Service"? Sounds more like an honour system. Remember what kind of forum this is.
- "Support at all times" Support for the program? From who? I know you don't stay up 24/7.
- Neither screenshot indicated a place to list proxies. What is on the Settings tab?
Bowling219 said:1. Respond once finished testing
2. The program acts up for instagram, I'll end up fixing it sometime this week.
3. I never actually browsed through, so I just assumed it would be low costing, so I made it $1.
4. I expect some people to, but not everyone. I just put it there, so yeah.
5. Edited it, I phrased it wrong.
6. There are no proxies required. I can add proxy support if you'd like.
1. I just did a test, and in 1 minute and 13 seconds it checked 100 usernames.PrintLn said:
- [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]What do you mean? You should know how long it takes on average.[/font]
- [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]I'm asking for specifics.[/font]
- [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Not just on this forum. Those go for a lot. I've already had someone PM me asking me to make one.[/font]
- [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif].[/font]
- [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]I don't see the edit.[/font]
- [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Proxies aren't required, however, usually those who don't want to be in trouble use them.[/font]
Bowling219 said:1. I just did a test, and in 1 minute and 13 seconds it checked 100 usernames.
5. I just did the edit
I'm gonna be closing this for a short amount of time, found a big bug with Twitter and Instagram. Reopening when fixed.
PrintLn said:Averages aren't very accurate at the beginning. It's better if you did it over an hour. Further, that sample is about 0.73 seconds per name. That seems unusually slow. Any reason for this? How many threads? (Remember the numbers aren't accurate in the beginning. It needs time to converge.) And which service was that on? Making so many requests to a service might get your IP rate limited or banned temporarily. How does this program deal with that? You said you could add support for reading a proxy list.
Please answer the question about the bug(s) with IG. I'm also interested in what the Twitter bug is.
What so you tried 100 on all 4 and you got the exact same time for each??Bowling219 said:The 0.73 seconds/name was for all 4 services. The IG bug is probably due to IP rate limiting, and I may handle that by using external sources to check availability, and I don't know what's causing the Twitter bug. I'm gonna have both of these bugs fixed hopefully this week (or by Christmas). It is currently single-threaded, but I have it setup so I can add multi-threading by adding maybe 1-10 lines of code.
I already have all the code ready for multithreading, just need to do a bit of tweaking, and it'd be ready. I'll do it once I fix the bugs.PrintLn said:What so you tried 100 on all 4 and you got the exact same time for each??
I'm asking about the symptoms of the bug(s).
1-10 lines seems very little for Java. Whenever someone mentions bad things about Java they always include the amount of boilerplate needed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?