Shockwave said:Yes, Someone come at me.
Would the economy be awful? because some items would be priced a little bit higher? this means more opportunity to make money yourself. If vial of water is suddenly 5k, more people would start making them themselves or selling them, which takes time away from their skilling and adds to their play time so it would increase the amount of hours played by runescapers which is exactly what jagex would like.gavin101 said:No, botting does not defeat the purpose of the game. If there were no bots, the economy of Runescape would be awful. Prices would drastically change. Take chinchompas for example: if there were no bots hunting the prices for red chinchompas would be outrageous. They are currently 517gp per chinchompa. On the 22nd of October, they were 475gp each.
Just because Jagex released a statement saying bots would be broken, everyone is now buying out highly botted supplies in Runescape. From the 22nd of October until the 25th of October, all of these supplies prices are going to sky rocket. Just image if these skyrocketed prices stayed at that price forever. People couldn't train range at a fast pace without being rich, people couldn't use high alchemy without having a decent amount of money to spend; I could go on with these examples forever.
My final conclusion again is is no, bots do not defeat the purpose of the game.
Sources:
Red Chinchompa price: http://services.runescape.com/m=itemdb_rs/Red_chinchompa/viewitem.ws?obj=10034
gavin101 said:No, botting does not defeat the purpose of the game. If there were no bots, the economy of Runescape would be awful. Prices would drastically change. Take chinchompas for example: if there were no bots hunting the prices for red chinchompas would be outrageous. They are currently 517gp per chinchompa. On the 22nd of October, they were 475gp each.
Just because Jagex released a statement saying bots would be broken, everyone is now buying out highly botted supplies in Runescape. From the 22nd of October until the 25th of October, all of these supplies prices are going to sky rocket. Just image if these skyrocketed prices stayed at that price forever. People couldn't train range at a fast pace without being rich, people couldn't use high alchemy without having a decent amount of money to spend; I could go on with these examples forever.
My final conclusion again is is no, bots do not defeat the purpose of the game.
Sources:
Red Chinchompa price: http://services.runescape.com/m=itemdb_rs/Red_chinchompa/viewitem.ws?obj=10034
Kevin said:No botting does not defeat the purpose of the game because;
1.) Gold farmers gather resources in mass amounts. Amounts that normal players would not have the time nor the patience to gather. With the sheer volume of resources flooding the market, this keeps the prices on them to a minimum. Have raw materials at a low price keeps the price of training secondary skills (fletching, smithing, etc) to a minimum and even lets you profit off of training them.
2.) Bots can be used to speed up training or getting certain tasks done, such as getting void. I know for a fact that I would much rather be posting on here then suiciding for a set of void. Also, bots click a shit load faster and more precisely, this can speed up mundane tasks such as cleaning herbs.
3.) Botting lets you skip the parts of the game that suck, allowing you to enjoy the best parts of it such as PKing, Bossing, and Questing.
Instead of just telling me that I'm wrong, take away the credibility of what I gave as support for my argument. I thought this was supposed to be a debate, not a bunch of idiots shouting over botting, saying that they're debating.RuneScape said:Would you not like to see legit players having fun, instead of reporting bots? People do that daily, for 12+ hours waiting for them to get banned so the game can be more fun. To me, your statements are wrong. It is not fair, and it should have never happened. Earn the money yourself, you'd be more proud. Don't bot your way to the top, it is not fair.
Kevin said:Affirmative
No botting does not defeat the purpose of the game because;
1.) Gold farmers gather resources in mass amounts. Amounts that normal players would not have the time nor the patience to gather. With the sheer volume of resources flooding the market, this keeps the prices on them to a minimum. Have raw materials at a low price keeps the price of training secondary skills (fletching, smithing, etc) to a minimum and even lets you profit off of training them.
2.) Bots can be used to speed up training or getting certain tasks done, such as getting void. I know for a fact that I would much rather be posting on here then suiciding for a set of void. Also, bots click a shit load faster and more precisely, this can speed up mundane tasks such as cleaning herbs.
3.) Botting lets you skip the parts of the game that suck, allowing you to enjoy the best parts of it such as PKing, Bossing, and Questing.
Monstar said:In all honesty, botting does defeat the purpose of the game.
I don't have a clue why someone would cheat, you're not accomplishing anything out of cheating.
A majority of you are claiming that it's okay, that the aim of the game is to "Max out" your account, in which case if you max out your account... Who really did it? Not you, you won't get that feeling of accomplishment.
Another reason why botting is harmful to Runescape is because, when real "Human" players go to skilling spots, a lot of bots have mouse speed set up so high that by the time you get to the tree or rock or whatever. It has been chopped down or the ore has been taken, this in my opinion is extremely annoying and caused me to quit.
I'm extremely happy that Runescape has really started cracking down on bots, now I can play the game with real people and get that conversation aspect that I loved so much.
Relapse said:I think a tournament sort of debate would be a lot better this is just going to be completely unorganized
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?