Question about gravedigging.

[tu y tu mama]

I'm not sure, I don't remember correctly.
I reported a post once for gravedigging. And I think someone said that a post isn't gravedigging as long as the post is related to the original thread.
Is that correct?

 

[Ben Hartley]

If it adds something of related quality then its probably not bad but if its a post like "hi thanks MM<M20 characters>" on a 2 year old thread this not normal

 

[Pichu]

Saying thanks to a dump thread from 2 months ago, does not make sense does it, thus it is gravedigging.

 

[Tyler-]

Depends on the cirmumstances, but if its bumping an old thread even though its relevant, still grave digging imo

 

[Eon]

Posting on a thread where its last post is over a month old is considered gravedigging.
Posting on a thread where its last post is between one and 3 weeks is also considered gravedigging unless it adds real value to the thread.

 

[Strength_mybb_import21403]

Even if the thread was made months ago, and you post something that adds to it, it's not really grave digging. One example is the 'count to 10000' thread, it was made months ago, but you can still add to it. Like what Pichu said, if you say thanks for a dump that was two months ago, that is unnecessary.

 

[Relapse]

Like others said its usually circumstantial

 

[Techno]

I'm not sure, I don't remember correctly.
I reported a post once for gravedigging. And I think someone said that a post isn't gravedigging as long as the post is related to the original thread.
Is that correct?

Depends how long ago the last post was and how long the thread has been dead. If it has been dead for more then 2weeks and the owner of the thread hasn't bumped it it means it's gravedigging.