Your first sentence seems completely fine.Mystical Bill said:I'm waiting for a member with the "Grammar Nazi" award to come along and fuck up.
Pandas you get 8/10, you put the "50%" before the agree and that's grammatically incorrect.
500 said:Your first sentence seems completely fine.
Except, for you last sentence I need to fix it up a little bit.
Pandas, yo get an 8/10. The reason is you put the "50%" before the agree, and that is grammatically incorrect.
So, in conclusion, I give you a 6/10 or a 7/10.
Here is how you should rewrite your sentence, "Based on your sentence, I will rate your grammar 9/10."Capone said:Based on your sentence i will rate your grammar 9/10.
Loser said:8/10, this is what you need to correct;
for* olde english.* Very* good use of grammar,* sir.
LSX said:10/10, But just remember, Don't correct me unless you are English teacher.
Seven said:@Profit
10/10
You are very good at implementing good grammar qualities in your posts.
Wнιтe said:0/10, based on the fact that you are @Seven and I am superior (in every way baby).
Seven said:7/10
Also, I am replying again because I would actually like to know how good my grammar is.
8/10 because at your first phrase, it should be a period instead of a comma.Wнιтe said:9/10 to be actually honest, I notice minor spelling and grammatical errors but that's it. You're doing good @Seven .
dui said:We don't start our sentences with numbers sir; for that you recieve a 3:10.
8/10Bed said:This is a great post; rate 9:10, except for one thing. To make it better the word "however" should be added after the semicolon just to make it sound better!
Random said:8/10
Im the best a the grammars, dont even try mate. Ill bash in ur fokn head bruv. Get at me ok, sorry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?