Amp said:I would say that yours is not the best.
6/10
Noscope said:This is taking such a long time. It is unnecessary as well. If people would just post in this thread, it would go at a much quicker pace.
As for you, I would say 5/10. That is because of the use of your pronouns. Who would "Yours.." Be? I've become quite the grammar nazi.
Noscope said:Well, no one is keeping this thread alive, so I figured I'd liven it up.
I'd assume for me, so I do not get disqualified, a 10/10. Amazing grammar.
GOR said:Your spelling I would rate as 8/10 from your overall posts
Noscope said:Glad to see this becoming more lively. As for you, GOR, I would say 8/10.
Anyone is free of charge to rate my posts.
Well you're disqualified, due to not rating the person above you.Pick said:Lol @ people taking there time to type out a nice little sentence so people think they are so HQ
Let's get this thread started up again. As for the person above me, I would award you a solid 10/10.Noscope said:Well you're disqualified, due to not rating the person above you.
4/10.
Place said:Let's get this thread started up again. As for the person above me, I would award you a solid 10/10.
Loyal said:I do not see how can we rate someone's grammar just like that, i mean their is no way to really ''rate'', if you know what i mean, but 10/10 ? haha.
Theft said:Oooh, I have you on this one, Reptar.
Their*
8/10
This user has a very eloquent style, and as such does indeed deserve an eight.Noscope said:Well you're disqualified, due to not rating the person above you.
4/10.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?