I don't remember an intellectual conversation where someone hasn't made an excuse to leave. Everyone's a coward. Too insecure to have their ideas challenged. There's nothing wrong with admitting to ignorance. And, hey, if I'm incorrect, I would love if you showed me.Random said:I disagree, but don't feel like arguing anymore on this, as you'll not see from my point of view.. and It'll go on for hours.
Have fun in your world.
See that? you're trying to have the last laugh ;pCann!bal said:I don't remember an intellectual conversation where someone hasn't made an excuse to leave. Everyone's a coward. Too insecure to have their ideas challenged. There's nothing wrong with admitting to ignorance. And, hey, if I'm incorrect, I would love if you showed me.
I've addressed seemingly significant flaws in your argument and I would enjoy if you addressed their invalidity.
No, I'm challenging your ideas and you're being a coward.Random said:See that? you're trying to have the last laugh ;p
no, I'm leaving because there's no point arguing with you, as you'll not change your views so nothing will be accomplished but time wasted.
Schrodinger used his theoretical cat metaphor in a mocking manner towards the suggestion that things can be in two states simultaneously. Please at least learn the rudimentary fundamentals of a topic before you start referencing it.Random said:What I mean is there is no point to such arguments, as there is no end. Same as Schrödinger had come to learn, if we can't prove, we must accept that both options are true and false.
So this argument has no grounds, is all.
You can carry on with it, I've simply debated my opinion that there is no reason for this argument.
cheers!
The point to any argument is to a) gain clarity on the matter b) increase the knowledge and understanding of both parties or c) to stimulate intellect and provoke thought. That's why philosophical debates which have no 'definite' answer occur.Random said:What I mean is there is no point to such arguments, as there is no end. Same as Schrödinger had come to learn, if we can't prove, we must accept that both options are true and false.
So this argument has no grounds, is all.
You can carry on with it, I've simply debated my opinion that there is no reason for this argument.
cheers!
Raptor said:Schrodinger used his theoretical cat metaphor in a mocking manner towards the suggestion that things can be in two states simultaneously. Please at least learn the rudimentary fundamentals of a topic before you start referencing it.
Stop trying to create a excuse for yourself, I admitted before you were right about one thing why can't you? You are utterly pathetic.Random said:I just want to state that all my words before this post were complete BS made up/referenced to on the spot, in an attempt to get OP upset.
Before you start going off on me for how little I know on the subject.
Interesting, especially the picture.Radical said:This is about the unfinished story of The Mysterious Stranger. The Mysterious Stranger is the final novel attempted by the American author Mark Twain. He worked on it periodically from 1897 through 1908. The body of work is a serious social commentary by Twain addressing his ideas of the Moral Sense and the "damned human race". Twain wrote multiple versions of the story; each is unfinished and involves the character of "Satan". (wikipedia)
Mark Twain passed away before he could finish it in 1910 at the age of 74. -OWLS. HF
The reason I took his word were because there was a debate/philosophy for this exact thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?