Reputation Page

[Fireworks]

On the reputation page, I would like to click the words, Negative or Positive, so I could see only the negative. You know, filtering.

 

[Seven]

I know this is possible because a few sites have this, I would love it to be implemented.

 

[El Alex]

This could be a great idea, now I won't have to tap and scroll all over the place to find a neg.

 

[NoTez]

Yes.

Always wanted to look through negs only instead of browsing each page.

 

[Captain]

You guys can still just see the negs without going through every page. This would just save 10 seconds

 

[Exist]

Isn't there a filter option under the rep? Where you can view only posi neutral or neg? And then you hit: GO?
I definitely see it. And have used it.
But I guess it would save 3 seconds if you could click the physical words? I don't see this being implemented though. Since it already somewhat exists...

 

[Johnny_S]

At the bottom click on "show all votes" and select / positive / negative / neutral rep and hit "ok" (to filter it).
Edit: Trap was faster.

Another option (via url) would be

<rep url>&show=<negative/neutral/positive>&sort=<username/dateline>
(remove <> from those filters and use only negative / neutral / positive [depends on what reps you want to filter, same for username or dateline)

 

[NoTez]

Indeed. Didn't notice at all, yet I am a new member with a valid excuse.

 

[Fireworks]

At the bottom click on "show all votes" and select / positive / negative / neutral rep and hit "ok" (to filter it).
Edit: Trap was faster.

Another option (via url) would be

<rep url>&show=<negative/neutral/positive>&sort=<username/dateline>
(remove <> from those filters and use only negative / neutral / positive [depends on what reps you want to filter, same for username or dateline)

Thanks Johnny. I was looking for the URL way too. (To post a fix as well for it.) It should be much easier to implement now that the code's here. 

Nice job on theme m8.

 

[Matigo]

Nah I use what @Trap uses. This is sort of useless.

 

[Fireworks]

Nah I use what @Trap uses. This is sort of useless.

Functionality and ease of use is never useless.

 

[Matigo]

@Fireworks but in reality its useless because we already have a way of doing this.

 

[Fireworks]

@Fireworks but in reality its useless because we already have a way of doing this.

So you're telling me, if there was a new way to create energy to power our homes, and it was much faster and safer to use, that we shouldn't implement it, because "we already have a way of doing this"?

 

[Matigo]

@Fireworks, this is a forum not a fricken house. Your just being lazy.

 

[Fireworks]

@Fireworks, this is a forum not a fricken house. Your just being lazy.

It was the same situation, just a difference in scale on my metaphor. Where-as I can see how scale would apply, but in all honesty, it's just a feature that adds greater usability to site. 

For instance it would help mobile users a lot. Instead of having to go through what @Random (I think) posted.

 

[Matigo]

@Fireworks it wont be implemented because this forum is not in need of it, literally, this would only help the lazy people.
Stop defending it bro.

 

[Fireworks]

@Fireworks it wont be implemented because this forum is not in need of it, literally, this would only help the lazy people.
Stop defending it bro.

I'm entitled to defend my opinion. The fact that you think the forum doesn't need it, is simply that. What you think. 
You tell me to stop defending it, I'll tell you to stop trying to speak for everyone else on the forum.

Lets call it how it is and state this is a matter of subjectivity. What you think vs. What I think. Majority wins..

 

[Matigo]

This threads getting to autistic for me.

@Fireworks keep hoping.

 

[Fireworks]

This threads getting *too autistic for me.
@Fireworks keep hoping.

Sorry if the heat's too much bae, catch you later.

 

[NoTez]

As said, it's already there. Just scroll down and look for the boxes. Choose the left one.