Bad Bieber said:I've heard a few complain about the way you did it, and honestly think your just trying to get a moderator spot?
You guys should all submit a version of eNews to TE and let him decide who gets it. But I agree, something needs to be done about eNews, or it removed altogether.
Bad Bieber said:I've heard a few complain about the way you did it, and honestly think your just trying to get a moderator spot?
You guys should all submit a version of eNews to TE and let him decide who gets it. But I agree, something needs to be done about eNews, or it removed altogether.
Dungeoneering said:I agree someone else needs to do it because They are obviously are not doing it
If you wanna lead I don't really care its just Who ever is in the news better not leave for ever and just Quit doing it in a month
Liked the news before and it randomly stopped so yea
Get this back running
Maxie said:I agree that you should get the moderator type, I got a feeling that you are the leader type. And Bieber, tbh, how did you even get your moderator spot? You shouldn't even ask that.
Jonathan, you should clearly get this spot.
That's an easy one, I was approached by TE about it. He's known me for a long time now, and felt I would be a good addition to the site.Maxie said:I agree that you should get the moderator type, I got a feeling that you are the leader type. And Bieber, tbh, how did you even get your moderator spot? You shouldn't even ask that.
Jonathan, you should clearly get this spot.
Dungeoneering said:Bad Bieber said:I've heard a few complain about the way you did it, and honestly think your just trying to get a moderator spot?
You guys should all submit a version of eNews to TE and let him decide who gets it. But I agree, something needs to be done about eNews, or it removed altogether.
He wouldn't get a mod spot
He would just get to post the enews every week
So every one submits theirs to him and he posts it thats it really
Its not like he would get a moderator positon on the site I don't think
A lot of people don't share those intentions and would just want it to say they're a moderator.Jonathan said:Dungeoneering said:Bad Bieber said:I've heard a few complain about the way you did it, and honestly think your just trying to get a moderator spot?
You guys should all submit a version of eNews to TE and let him decide who gets it. But I agree, something needs to be done about eNews, or it removed altogether.
He wouldn't get a mod spot
He would just get to post the enews every week
So every one submits theirs to him and he posts it thats it really
Its not like he would get a moderator positon on the site I don't think
Amped- was moderator because he modded the eNews section, but that's not what this is about, but of course they are always going to people who think that.
This is about running eNews and making it great again:thumbsup:
Bad Bieber said:That's an easy one, I was approached by TE about it. He's known me for a long time now, and felt I would be a good addition to the site.Maxie said:I agree that you should get the moderator type, I got a feeling that you are the leader type. And Bieber, tbh, how did you even get your moderator spot? You shouldn't even ask that.
Jonathan, you should clearly get this spot.
And, I'm not putting down Jonathan, he's a cool guy, I just feel he should have went about this a bit differently. Jonathan, I can't remember where I all I saw it, but a few people had complaints. Since I can't provide links, so disregard that then.
And "you guys" was inferring the members of RG eNews.
eXero said:I would agree that someone else needs to do it, but from experience I don't like you. Ypu constantly put me down, and I don't think you should take over the spot. I haven't seen Amped- around the forum ever, so the position does need to be given to someone else.
Bad Bieber said:A lot of people don't share those intentions and would just want it to say they're a moderator.Jonathan said:Dungeoneering said:He wouldn't get a mod spot
He would just get to post the enews every week
So every one submits theirs to him and he posts it thats it really
Its not like he would get a moderator positon on the site I don't think
Amped- was moderator because he modded the eNews section, but that's not what this is about, but of course they are always going to people who think that.
This is about running eNews and making it great again:thumbsup:
Jonathan said:eXero said:I would agree that someone else needs to do it, but from experience I don't like you. Ypu constantly put me down, and I don't think you should take over the spot. I haven't seen Amped- around the forum ever, so the position does need to be given to someone else.
Hey I don't have any against you, you know :thumbsup: I just felt you over-did it a bit during the contest.
No hard feelings buddy.
Bad Bieber said:A lot of people don't share those intentions and would just want it to say they're a moderator.Jonathan said:Amped- was moderator because he modded the eNews section, but that's not what this is about, but of course they are always going to people who think that.
This is about running eNews and making it great again:thumbsup:
Yes, I could name a few, haha
I'm a quick learner, and The Elite didn't hire me merely because we're mates, he knows my moderation past and how I operate. But, thanks for the compliment anyways, and I do understand where you're coming from.Maxie said:Bad Bieber said:That's an easy one, I was approached by TE about it. He's known me for a long time now, and felt I would be a good addition to the site.Maxie said:I agree that you should get the moderator type, I got a feeling that you are the leader type. And Bieber, tbh, how did you even get your moderator spot? You shouldn't even ask that.
Jonathan, you should clearly get this spot.
And, I'm not putting down Jonathan, he's a cool guy, I just feel he should have went about this a bit differently. Jonathan, I can't remember where I all I saw it, but a few people had complaints. Since I can't provide links, so disregard that then.
And "you guys" was inferring the members of RG eNews.
My honest opinion, which I don't often state, is that that is the worst reason ever for getting a moderator spot. I didn't think The Elite would be that unprofessional. No offense, you are probably taking care of the spot better than most members here. But still, you should have gotten to know the forum before getting a moderator. Sure, I would promote my mates to moderator if I owned a forum, but if it was this successful, I wouldn't.
Bad Bieber said:I'm a quick learner, and The Elite didn't hire me merely because we're mates, he knows my moderation past and how I operate. But, thanks for the compliment anyways, and I do understand where you're coming from.Maxie said:Bad Bieber said:That's an easy one, I was approached by TE about it. He's known me for a long time now, and felt I would be a good addition to the site.
And, I'm not putting down Jonathan, he's a cool guy, I just feel he should have went about this a bit differently. Jonathan, I can't remember where I all I saw it, but a few people had complaints. Since I can't provide links, so disregard that then.
And "you guys" was inferring the members of RG eNews.
My honest opinion, which I don't often state, is that that is the worst reason ever for getting a moderator spot. I didn't think The Elite would be that unprofessional. No offense, you are probably taking care of the spot better than most members here. But still, you should have gotten to know the forum before getting a moderator. Sure, I would promote my mates to moderator if I owned a forum, but if it was this successful, I wouldn't.
Anyways, back on topic. I wasn't putting Jonathan down, I really wasn't. Like I said, I know people who just like glory so that's why I (apparently poorly) suggested everyone get a chance so TE could decide who would be best.
Jonathan, I could too mate :anxious:
Multiply said:To be honest, I think @[Jonathan] would do a really good job in this position.
If you get it mate, I would love to submit an article each week!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?