Hi I was wondering what you guys thought about Science versus Religion. There's equal theory to support both sides but how would you guys prove which you thought was "real"?
Nostalgic said:@Epidemic Yes, by fact (in terms of religion) there has been stated "proof" of some of the geological features, etc. listed in The Bible.
This isn't a debate about accomplishment. It's about what you would believe over the other and why.
Nostalgic said:@Wash That's why I asked for an opinion on what you believed was better. There's no right or wrong as long as you can back it up.
Nostalgic said:@Wash Wow, that was actually really good. I feel the same way to be honest.
Nostalgic said:Hi I was wondering what you guys thought about Science versus Religion. There's equal theory to support both sides but how would you guys prove which you thought was "real"?
Nostalgic said:@Cann!bal I didn't ask for one rational answer, I asked for an opinion.
Cann!bal said:I think you lack the basic understanding of science and religion.
There is not equal support for both sides, nor can both sides be proven. It's not 50/50. One perspective resides entirely on evidence and refinement, the ideals of progression, whilst the other resides entirely on blind mindless adherence to illogical doctrines and bully authority figures, the ideals of slavery, which perpetuate the bondage of man's mind and an overwhelming amount of injustice. When these concepts are highlighted in this manner, there is only one rational answer.
HDMi said:But of course you’re right, since your conceptions are flawed to begin with. It’s hard to take a guy calling himself Cannibal seriously when talking about human’s agony along the centuries, or how one thing humanizes humans while the other demonize them.
Cann!bal said:If my conceptions are flawed, I am not right, fool. You fail to even explain why I am wrong, rather, you make fallacious arguments.