Maxie said:Sure. It was gang repping. But they all had the same opinion. Gang repping can be abused in so many different ways. Here, they were openly saying that they were against him. If they wanted a more 'stealth' attack, they could just have wrote a bullshit reason instead. It's still gang repping just it doesn't appears to be. Then I think we should ban everybody who neg repped somebody with more than 5 negative rep. Because that's gang repping.
Maybe that was an unfair parallel, but that's just because, if he weren't the owner, they would never be banned. Also, isn't it kinda demonstration? Which at least I, think should be allowed, no matter if it's in a group or alone.
Sure, most kids are immature, but that's still like saying all blondes are stupid because the majority is, get my point?
I am simply complaining as I want to give him a chance to change. If this doesn't change, I'll just leave. But I think RuneGear could be an awesome place with the right type of management.
Oxide said:Wow, the amount of assumptions in this thread are too damn high, maxie how the hell do you know what Glenn is planning on doing. He has even Announced it publicly the features he is going to bring out. A forum is a business and it has to be profitable. and he is trying to do that by hosting contest but with a entry fee(membership).
Scenery Defender of Ponyville said:Oxide said:Wow, the amount of assumptions in this thread are too damn high, maxie how the hell do you know what Glenn is planning on doing. He has even Announced it publicly the features he is going to bring out. A forum is a business and it has to be profitable. and he is trying to do that by hosting contest but with a entry fee(membership).
Chewbaka said:Maxie said:Sure. It was gang repping. But they all had the same opinion. Gang repping can be abused in so many different ways. Here, they were openly saying that they were against him. If they wanted a more 'stealth' attack, they could just have wrote a bullshit reason instead. It's still gang repping just it doesn't appears to be. Then I think we should ban everybody who neg repped somebody with more than 5 negative rep. Because that's gang repping.
Maybe that was an unfair parallel, but that's just because, if he weren't the owner, they would never be banned. Also, isn't it kinda demonstration? Which at least I, think should be allowed, no matter if it's in a group or alone.
Sure, most kids are immature, but that's still like saying all blondes are stupid because the majority is, get my point?
I am simply complaining as I want to give him a chance to change. If this doesn't change, I'll just leave. But I think RuneGear could be an awesome place with the right type of management.
Our team here isn't stupid. We can tell what people's intentions are. If someone finds a loop hole and abuses it, we aren't going to let him keep doing it. In terms of rules, We are a forum, not a business.
What will get you in trouble faster, being disrespectful to your brother or being disrespectful to your mom?
I am sorry if I offended kids who arent immature.
You are really saying that we need the right management on a COMMUNITY forum in order for RG to improve? Best way for RG to improve is if the members improve.
Oxide said:Wow, the amount of assumptions in this thread are too damn high, maxie how the hell do you know what Glenn is planning on doing. He has even Announced it publicly the features he is going to bring out. A forum is a business and it has to be profitable. and he is trying to do that by hosting contest but with a entry fee(membership).
Maxie said:RAF said:Glen didn't ban anyone, I did.
Because you are a sell out. I'm sorry, but you are.
RAF said:Maxie said:RAF said:Glen didn't ban anyone, I did.
Because you are a sell out. I'm sorry, but you are.
I forgot this was an inspirational movie, and I also forgot that this is my final year of schooling.
Maxie said:Chewbaka said:Maxie said:Sure. It was gang repping. But they all had the same opinion. Gang repping can be abused in so many different ways. Here, they were openly saying that they were against him. If they wanted a more 'stealth' attack, they could just have wrote a bullshit reason instead. It's still gang repping just it doesn't appears to be. Then I think we should ban everybody who neg repped somebody with more than 5 negative rep. Because that's gang repping.
Maybe that was an unfair parallel, but that's just because, if he weren't the owner, they would never be banned. Also, isn't it kinda demonstration? Which at least I, think should be allowed, no matter if it's in a group or alone.
Sure, most kids are immature, but that's still like saying all blondes are stupid because the majority is, get my point?
I am simply complaining as I want to give him a chance to change. If this doesn't change, I'll just leave. But I think RuneGear could be an awesome place with the right type of management.
Our team here isn't stupid. We can tell what people's intentions are. If someone finds a loop hole and abuses it, we aren't going to let him keep doing it. In terms of rules, We are a forum, not a business.
What will get you in trouble faster, being disrespectful to your brother or being disrespectful to your mom?
I am sorry if I offended kids who arent immature.
You are really saying that we need the right management on a COMMUNITY forum in order for RG to improve? Best way for RG to improve is if the members improve.
Bullshit. The management needs to improve. They are the forums leader. It's just like saying Hitler doesn't have to improve the people does. Sure you ain't stupid, but there will always be loopholes, you can't disagree with that. You wont get any funny discussions if you keep banning everyone that doesn't agree with you. A forum without discussion is kinda worthless.
Oxide said:Wow, the amount of assumptions in this thread are too damn high, maxie how the hell do you know what Glenn is planning on doing. He has even Announced it publicly the features he is going to bring out. A forum is a business and it has to be profitable. and he is trying to do that by hosting contest but with a entry fee(membership).
Sure, I guess bribing members to stay up with bullshit is a way you can do it.
Maxie said:Bullshit. The management needs to improve. They are the forums leader. It's just like saying Hitler doesn't have to improve the people does. Sure you ain't stupid, but there will always be loopholes, you can't disagree with that. You wont get any funny discussions if you keep banning everyone that doesn't agree with you. A forum without discussion is kinda worthless.
Chewbaka said:Maxie said:Bullshit. The management needs to improve. They are the forums leader. It's just like saying Hitler doesn't have to improve the people does. Sure you ain't stupid, but there will always be loopholes, you can't disagree with that. You wont get any funny discussions if you keep banning everyone that doesn't agree with you. A forum without discussion is kinda worthless.
I guess you don't understand how a community forum works. The staff are suppose to monitor the forum and do things like warnings, delete unwanted posts, etc. The management is responsible for running the forum and do things like bring new features to the site, etc. Neither the staff nor the management is expected to bring content (guides, contests, discussions, etc) to the site. This is where the community comes in. The members of the forum brings the content, but there are rules that are in place and if you break them, you face the consequences.
Oxide said:Maxie said:Chewbaka said:Our team here isn't stupid. We can tell what people's intentions are. If someone finds a loop hole and abuses it, we aren't going to let him keep doing it. In terms of rules, We are a forum, not a business.
What will get you in trouble faster, being disrespectful to your brother or being disrespectful to your mom?
I am sorry if I offended kids who arent immature.
You are really saying that we need the right management on a COMMUNITY forum in order for RG to improve? Best way for RG to improve is if the members improve.
Bullshit. The management needs to improve. They are the forums leader. It's just like saying Hitler doesn't have to improve the people does. Sure you ain't stupid, but there will always be loopholes, you can't disagree with that. You wont get any funny discussions if you keep banning everyone that doesn't agree with you. A forum without discussion is kinda worthless.
Oxide said:Wow, the amount of assumptions in this thread are too damn high, maxie how the hell do you know what Glenn is planning on doing. He has even Announced it publicly the features he is going to bring out. A forum is a business and it has to be profitable. and he is trying to do that by hosting contest but with a entry fee(membership).
Sure, I guess bribing members to stay up with bullshit is a way you can do it.
Your offering to bribe me?
I would love to be bribed tbh, nothing like free money
Relapse said:The problem with 90% of the points made in this thread is that your assuming a forum is a democracy. It's not.
Relapse said:The problem with 90% of the points made in this thread is that your assuming a forum is a democracy. It's not.
Chewbaka said:Relapse said:The problem with 90% of the points made in this thread is that your assuming a forum is a democracy. It's not.
What are you talking about?
Gamma said:He's implying that people think that their voice has a say, but in reality, it doesn't.
Chewbaka said:Gamma said:He's implying that people think that their voice has a say, but in reality, it doesn't.
And now you are implying that you know reality?
Trust me, we are closest to a democracy than anything else.
Maxie said:Chewbaka said:Gamma said:He's implying that people think that their voice has a say, but in reality, it doesn't.
And now you are implying that you know reality?
Trust me, we are closest to a democracy than anything else.
Don't forward that to Gamma. It was Relapse implying that.
Chewbaka said:Gamma said:He's implying that people think that their voice has a say, but in reality, it doesn't.
And now you are implying that you know reality?
Trust me, we are closest to a democracy than anything else.
Relapse said:Chewbaka said:Gamma said:He's implying that people think that their voice has a say, but in reality, it doesn't.
And now you are implying that you know reality?
Trust me, we are closest to a democracy than anything else.
Oh really? Because i can go walk the streets right now screaming f*ck Obama and not get arrested. I can Even get a gang(reference to your previous post) to go outside and scream f*ck obama and not get arrested. That's democracy. RG? Not a democracy
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?