Storm said:Hope I suppose.
Trust me, I've been wondering the same thing for quite some time.
Storm said:You're trying to run a forum, and yet you insist on insulting it's members.
You give someone who's been here for barely a month a staff position (nothing personal bud).
Sure, the guy may be a HQ user, but that has nothing to do with the qualities that make a staff member. You can't justify such a decision with "Oh the guy's more HQ then everyone." That just screams stupidity.
Trust, integrity, commitment.. Those qualities aren't defined in a month.
How did you even come across such a decision? There's no need for more staff, the place is dead enough and should be easily managed by the 5 staff that previously existed.
If you want to run a forum, stop slapping your members in the face, stop disrespecting them and for once, do your goddamn job.
Robbie said:You raise a good point about the 1 month joining time. You're just mad though.
RAF said:Number One rule for Staff, don't ask for it or don't expect it. You were actually extremely high up there for Staff, not anymore sadly.
People fathom to see how we work, we knew you're a contributive member and this was a test to see that those who b*tch are in no way deserving of that position.
If you guys don't like it, no one is forcing you to stay, leave, go, whatever. We run our forum the way we want to, you pay for hosting, the time spent monitoring it and other features, then you'll have a say in how we run our forum.
michaelkr1 said:RAF said:Number One rule for Staff, don't ask for it or don't expect it. You were actually extremely high up there for Staff, not anymore sadly.
People fathom to see how we work, we knew you're a contributive member and this was a test to see that those who b*tch are in no way deserving of that position.
If you guys don't like it, no one is forcing you to stay, leave, go, whatever. We run our forum the way we want to, you pay for hosting, the time spent monitoring it and other features, then you'll have a say in how we run our forum.
Where in his post did he ask for a Staff position?
Pay for hosting? What, do you pocket the RG Elite and Sponsor funds do you? And all the adsense? We do pay for it. We're not asking for a big say.
Since when is an opinion frowned upon like you're dismissing us right now?
Like I said in my status - George deserved it, BCG would have if he was around a little longer. If you were to promote him in 3-5months time, would anyone care? NOPE!
Storm said:I've never asked for staff nor will I. Why even bother mentioning that I was "high up there for staff"? How is that possible.. "Apparently" I'm LQ.
Again, a slap in the face.
What kind of low end "test" do you think this is? If you announced your decisions, things I'm sure would have turned out quite differently.
Your members are simply curious. If you had of made an announcement, justified your decisions to the members here who put so much time into making this forum what it is, I'm sure many would accept it.
"he had this certain quality which many of you won't understand." ..Or are we just too stupid to comprehend such things?
Inform your members.
What's the story behind that so called 'PHP developer', or perhaps the sudden demotion of mods? Not answering PM's is another example, as well as showing disrepect.
I'm bitching, if you want to call it that, about how this forum is managed, the fact that management constantly keep member's uninformed and how members here are treated.
Take myself for example..
I put a considerable amount of time, something that can't be taken back, into making the user bars for this forum.
Did anyone say thanks? No.
I was then asked to make more for the seperate groups that arose. I was kind enough to do so.
Did anyone say thanks? Again, no.
I then even bothered to resize them and edit them somewhat to fit better with the new and old theme respectively.
Again, nothing. People took my own work for their own. Point proven when this happened..
RAF said:If I posted a thread saying I promoted him, there would have been a b*tch-fest - I know my forum and the members. Not to mention I was at school.
Just no..RAF said:He insinuated he's in a better position than Bcg to be considered for Staff.
RAF said:If I posted a thread saying I promoted him, there would have been a b*tch-fest - I know my forum and the members. Not to mention I was at school.
This. A "b*tch-fest" is unavoidable going by your logic. Explaining your reasoning would mean that members can appreciate and understand your decisions. Ever notice that people are simply confused? You promote someone and the only reason you're willing to give is that "no one would understand".Bishy said:They're bitching anyway, except it's in multiple areas of the forums.
If you had made a thread, it'd all be in one thread, and then at least some could've appreciated the reason why this was done.
If people can't understand something, they'll react negatively, which is what a lot have done.
I never said that, it doesn't even make sense.RAF said:Just because we promote Staff you think it's bad treatment, ahh stop your freaking whinging.
You think insulting members is acceptable?RAF said:Members are treated the way we think they should be treated, if you don't like it, leave. Just because we promote Staff you think it's bad treatment, ahh stop your freaking whinging.
That was in response to an improvement I suggested.RAF said:I said thanks, WTF? "I absolutely love this member." - I've sent you PMs showing my gratification, and if in one case I didn't, a PM saying so would have lead me to apologise feeling like a douche bag.
Maybe once every few months when I'm looking for something. I never really bothered with the site to be honest.Inxy said:Do you go on Hack forums?
RAF said:Robbie said:You raise a good point about the 1 month joining time. You're just mad though.
We saw something in Bcg that we rarely see in other members.\
Storm said:That was for your sig, not the user bars.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?