• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

[Suggestion] No Pardons

Derrick Rose

User is banned.
Reputation
0
I'm tired of seeing this everywhere. If they get banned they shouldn't be allowed back. period.

Two in a row is enough.
 

BasedGod

User is banned.
Reputation
0
I sorta like the idea but users who have truly changed their ways and want a legitimate name for them selves will not be able to get a second chance. People such as Poop who r cool and now legit would not be ball here. I don't think so... Also, what if you got banned for "no reason". Then you wouldn't be able to come back if you wanted to. Just sayin
 

Derrick Rose

User is banned.
Reputation
0

they could pm the staff offsite not make it public and take up spots on my thread ya feel?
 

Narc

User is banned.
Reputation
0
I kinda agree. Although some users should be able to have second chances.
 

Derrick Rose

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Narc said:
I kinda agree. Although some users should be able to have second chances.

I guess what I'm trying to say is I do not want them to be made public.
 

Narc

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Xan said:
I guess what I'm trying to say is I do not want them to be made public.

I think it would be better for them to be private and have staff decided not members.
 

BasedGod

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Xan said:
they could pm the staff offsite not make it public and take up spots on my thread ya feel?

actually, i do. I agree with you now!!
 

Sector

Power member.
Reputation
0
I'd rather have it be kept public. It would be displayed as a forewarning to members that a user is making an attempt to come back. With that being said, I disagree with this suggestion.
 

Cann!bal

Power member.
Reputation
0
Xan said:
but there's more than just those two

That's quite blatant. I was simply pointing out your poor manifestation.

I personally like the ability to request a pardon. It allows members who truly deserve a second chance to return through a process of examination and selection by staff.

Narc said:
I think it would be better for them to be private and have staff decided not members.

I think having them public is much more favorable than having them private. Staff does decide; members have no say.
 

Poop

Active Member
Reputation
0
This is what should happen. The threads won't be public untill staff confirm its a legit person and the user is eligible for one. Then once it's confirmed a eligible pardon, it will be made public for everyone to see.

Just my opinion