The mutation is intended to deceive. Try to relieve the immense guilt socialism in the crisis of our societies. Clean the socialist politicians of infinite responsibility.
Looking for finger-pointing over which divert attention, claiming, as always socialism, the baser instincts of the species, the lowest instincts of the person: that mix of resentment and irrationality, common ingredients of the brew socialist.
Need not give many turns to rule the sentence: the culprits are the bankers.
'Indignaos' is, after all, the book Petete mutant of socialism, without giving up their drivel, appropriate for any simple-minded and degraded.
"For the power of money has never been greater, insolent, selfish with everyone from his own servants to the highest echelons of the state. The banks, privatized care primarily from dividends and the soaring salaries of its leaders, but not of general interest. has never been the distance between the poorest and the richest, and so encouraged competition and race for money. "
Marxistoide string, a thousand times repeated, year after year, ignoring the fact that since the Second World War have been socialists who have ruled, who have dominated and nationalized societies and economies. They are to blame. Socialism is the culprit.
No, the culprits were not the bankers. No, the bankers were not the perpetrators of any crime, nor blame for the crisis. The guilt is, exclusively, socialist politicians, on the understanding that social degradation of our democracy all politicians are in varying degrees and all participate in different ways.
All, for example, placed the state as the element of social cohesion and not in its size, as the oppressive entity that is destroying our societies and all turn to their public opinion willing to keep the welfare state unsustainable.
For one thing, the crisis is not only financial, but is a model of socialism, bureaucratization of rampant and excessive statism. Also in regard to the financial, the offender is socialism in its politically correct mutation.
In the U.S., armed the fuze the Jimmy Carter Administration, which in 1977 passed the Community Reinvestment Act, which was forced banks to lend to disadvantaged groups, by considerations of poverty and race, using criteria socialist because socialism has always been racist and demagogic.
We must recognize that the bankers were reluctant to enter a disastrous game that eliminated all the criteria of banking prudence, it was given to those who could not repay the money.
The great leap forward toward the precipice was in 1999, under President Bill Clinton and the dynamic vector was Fannie Mae Corporation, a state insurance, which endorsed all these loans. The bankers had suffered further persecution of trial groups, which led banks to the courts by analyzing balance sheets, rather than rational economic criteria but with emotional racial lines. Obama worked with ACORN, one of those groups litigants.
In September 1999, Fannie Mae Corporation began a pilot project that included 24 banks operating in 15 different markets, including metropolitan New York, with guarantees to encourage banks to lend to non-solvents, but with potential to become on electoral grounds.
In the spring of 2000, the program was generalized and Fannie Mae Corporation became the largest U.S. mortgage insurer.
This did not prevent she and her sister, also state, Freddie Mac, were in court for alleged racial discrimination. Banks urged to this policy and economically suicidal pseudomoral demanded greater involvement of the flood insurance and did nothing to grow, with the backing of the state, so that when the scam broke out would be the state that would assume losses. It was.
No, the bankers were not the cause of the disaster but who have acted as accomplices in the political interventionist socialists. The bankers bowed to the revelry, knowing that politicians do not leave in the lurch, because these were the culprits of the disaster and went to look very far to assume any responsibility to the citizens.
So they set a tacit alliance, and sometimes explicit. Socialist politicians would pay for the damage to the middle classes, the suffering and plundered taxpayer.
So, in the midst of hysteria, and erase traces of the crime, all the red bubbles mounted by politicians were transferred to taxpayers, while public funds were transferred, either directly or through guarantees, banks .
The bankers could, thus, avoid the worst consequences of the catastrophe and keep their high salary, instead of breaking.
A predator response was typically socialist politicians further damage to societies, families and individuals. It is to be indignant lot. With socialism, politicians and bankers, of course, but not as bankers but as complicit politicians.
With that anger, thousands of Spanish seconded my call, through the Platform for the Middle Classes, to protest against the depletion of taxpayers, November 23, 2008. There was no news, because the media are controlled by the Socialists, have been prostituted by political interventionism. It is also much to be indignant.
Excerpt from 'Indignaos rightly so! " Forthcoming Enrique de Diego
Looking for finger-pointing over which divert attention, claiming, as always socialism, the baser instincts of the species, the lowest instincts of the person: that mix of resentment and irrationality, common ingredients of the brew socialist.
Need not give many turns to rule the sentence: the culprits are the bankers.
'Indignaos' is, after all, the book Petete mutant of socialism, without giving up their drivel, appropriate for any simple-minded and degraded.
"For the power of money has never been greater, insolent, selfish with everyone from his own servants to the highest echelons of the state. The banks, privatized care primarily from dividends and the soaring salaries of its leaders, but not of general interest. has never been the distance between the poorest and the richest, and so encouraged competition and race for money. "
Marxistoide string, a thousand times repeated, year after year, ignoring the fact that since the Second World War have been socialists who have ruled, who have dominated and nationalized societies and economies. They are to blame. Socialism is the culprit.
No, the culprits were not the bankers. No, the bankers were not the perpetrators of any crime, nor blame for the crisis. The guilt is, exclusively, socialist politicians, on the understanding that social degradation of our democracy all politicians are in varying degrees and all participate in different ways.
All, for example, placed the state as the element of social cohesion and not in its size, as the oppressive entity that is destroying our societies and all turn to their public opinion willing to keep the welfare state unsustainable.
For one thing, the crisis is not only financial, but is a model of socialism, bureaucratization of rampant and excessive statism. Also in regard to the financial, the offender is socialism in its politically correct mutation.
In the U.S., armed the fuze the Jimmy Carter Administration, which in 1977 passed the Community Reinvestment Act, which was forced banks to lend to disadvantaged groups, by considerations of poverty and race, using criteria socialist because socialism has always been racist and demagogic.
We must recognize that the bankers were reluctant to enter a disastrous game that eliminated all the criteria of banking prudence, it was given to those who could not repay the money.
The great leap forward toward the precipice was in 1999, under President Bill Clinton and the dynamic vector was Fannie Mae Corporation, a state insurance, which endorsed all these loans. The bankers had suffered further persecution of trial groups, which led banks to the courts by analyzing balance sheets, rather than rational economic criteria but with emotional racial lines. Obama worked with ACORN, one of those groups litigants.
In September 1999, Fannie Mae Corporation began a pilot project that included 24 banks operating in 15 different markets, including metropolitan New York, with guarantees to encourage banks to lend to non-solvents, but with potential to become on electoral grounds.
In the spring of 2000, the program was generalized and Fannie Mae Corporation became the largest U.S. mortgage insurer.
This did not prevent she and her sister, also state, Freddie Mac, were in court for alleged racial discrimination. Banks urged to this policy and economically suicidal pseudomoral demanded greater involvement of the flood insurance and did nothing to grow, with the backing of the state, so that when the scam broke out would be the state that would assume losses. It was.
No, the bankers were not the cause of the disaster but who have acted as accomplices in the political interventionist socialists. The bankers bowed to the revelry, knowing that politicians do not leave in the lurch, because these were the culprits of the disaster and went to look very far to assume any responsibility to the citizens.
So they set a tacit alliance, and sometimes explicit. Socialist politicians would pay for the damage to the middle classes, the suffering and plundered taxpayer.
So, in the midst of hysteria, and erase traces of the crime, all the red bubbles mounted by politicians were transferred to taxpayers, while public funds were transferred, either directly or through guarantees, banks .
The bankers could, thus, avoid the worst consequences of the catastrophe and keep their high salary, instead of breaking.
A predator response was typically socialist politicians further damage to societies, families and individuals. It is to be indignant lot. With socialism, politicians and bankers, of course, but not as bankers but as complicit politicians.
With that anger, thousands of Spanish seconded my call, through the Platform for the Middle Classes, to protest against the depletion of taxpayers, November 23, 2008. There was no news, because the media are controlled by the Socialists, have been prostituted by political interventionism. It is also much to be indignant.
Excerpt from 'Indignaos rightly so! " Forthcoming Enrique de Diego
