• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

Was 9/11 an Inside Job?

Cann!bal

Power member.
Reputation
0
It doesn't really matter that jet fuel can't melt steel beams when 400,000 pounds of airliner comes crashing at speeds of 500 miles per hour into the building you're in. If you looked furthermore into this case rather than a couple 9/11 conspiracy theory documentaries on YouTube and Netflix, you would see that the official NIST report never claimed the steel melted, rather that the fires weakened the structural integrity of the steel to the point of structural failure.

This video nicely puts why you're dumb and how the towers fell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w

I'm really dumbfounded by the amount of 9/11 truthers there are. It's pretty insane how many people believe in this shit.
 

Hurt

Active Member
Reputation
0

Cute video, please explain these anomalies for me than.

Why has fire never caused a steel highrise to collapse, outside of the 9/11 incidents?
Take for example, the infamous One Meridian Plaza.

As documented by FEMA, a fire was reported at around 10:40 PM and then continued to rage on for 19 hours. That's quite a while.
Despite burning for 19 hours, costing 3 firefighter lives, injuring 24 firefighters, and causing millions in property damage, no part of the building ever collapsed.

" It was the largest highrise office building fire in modern
American history -- completely consuming eight floors of the building -- and was controlled only
when it reached a floor that was protected by automatic sprinklers."

- Page 1, Paragraph 1, in FEMA's official report.

Quite interesting that the fire was controlled after reaching automatic sprinklers, after burning through 8 floors.
Also, note that the fire burned for over 9 times as long as the WTC incident.

How could the towers fall after only 2 hours?

Another example, the infamous 9/11 cellphone calls made from the planes.
I find it interesting that so many of these calls were able to make it through, since the likelihood of calls being made and received from commercial airlines in 2001 was not that great.

Let's look at Project Achilles, shall we?
At just 2000 feet, four calls were made. 3/4 calls were able to connect, with 1/4 failing.

However, the 3 that did connect were of very poor quality.

At 4000 feet, another 4 calls were made.
This time, there was a 1/4 success rate. The single call that was able to connect was actually clear this time!

At 6000 feet, 12 calls were made.
Only 2 out of 12 calls were able to connect, and 1 of them was clear.
This means that at 6000 feet, 10 out of 12 calls were not able to connect at all.

At 8000 feet, 0/4 calls were able to connect.

With these poor results, it seems very suspect that many calls were able to be made, let alone be clear enough for conversation from those onboard flights 11 and 77.
 

Cann!bal

Power member.
Reputation
0
Did the One Meridian Plaza happen to be hit by a 400,000 pound Boeing 767 airliner at 500 miles per hour, severing the 15% of the perimeter columns and 20% of the core columns? Or did the One Meridian Plaza happen to have an airliner's worth of jet fuel burning in it? If I remember correctly, I don't think it did. And as demonstrated in the video I posted, the twin towers had a special structure, which aided to its collapse.

I don't understand. Is there something wrong with taking two hours? Is it suppose to be more or less? Is this time irregular somehow?

Are you trying to insinuate the passengers were in on it with all this phone shit? Like pre-recorded? If not, I don't see why the reception matters at all.
 

Hurt

Active Member
Reputation
0

Experts say most of the jet fuel was gone after the initial hits and explosions.
Yes, 2 hours IS an irregular time for the collapse, considering One Meridian Plaza burned for 19 hours with NO collapses.

I'm not insinuating that the passengers were in on it, more that the calls were faked.
The calls more than likely did not happen.

The cell phone calls were more than likely fake, because the reception is so bad up there.
Not to mention the Betty Ong call, she does not sound distressed whatsoever. She sounds calm, not like a person that has just witnessed 3 stabbings.

Please give this a listen, and explain how someone could be so calm after seeing 3 people being stabbed and having trouble breathing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-Tr0u35Tek

The towers would have fallen over if it was a result of the impact, not down as if it was a controlled demolition.

I'd like to hear your explanation on the traces of thermite found at ground zero.
How about the fact that a couple weeks before the attacks, there had been multiple evacuation drills in case of an incident like this?

Shortly before 9/11, Cheney had made it so that he alone was in charge of NORAD and the ability to tell them whether to stand down or to attack hijacked aircrafts, and made it so that the generals had no say whatsoever. That doesn't strike you as being odd?

I refuse to believe the fires and the impact just magically made the towers collapse, especially within that small of a timeframe.

Here is a post, by one of Boeings lead engineers.
 

Cann!bal

Power member.
Reputation
0
After 10 minutes, but I don't see how that time is necessarily relevant when there was 15,000 gallons of jet fuel and a supply of resources for the fire to continue.

To continue to compare the towers to the One Meridian Plaza is simply unfair and dishonest. It equates both scenarios while they're both totally different types of incidents. The One Meridian was built during the same period as the WTC and had spray-on fire protection on its steel frame like the WTC, however, the OMP was 38 stories while the Twin Towers were 110 stories, and most significantly, the WTC suffered prior structural damage and lost the fireproofing material on the steel beams from the plane crashes and the OMP did not.

What's the benefit in faking the calls? It's pointless. And I haven't heard any complaints that the families didn't think it was them. To assume this as true, is to assume they managed to find and hired a bunch of actors who sounded just like them without whistleblowing. Did they pay off the actors who didn't get the job, too? I think you could make a lot more money being a whistleblower of 9/11 than a paid 9/11 actor. You have to assume so much shit when you say this.

No, that doesn't necessarily strike me as odd. Coincidences are pretty common phenomenon. I mean, the creator of Frasier, his wife, and a known professional model all died on flight 11, while Seth MacFarlane and Mark Wahlberg were suppose to be on there, too. Or look at the immense amount of similarities between Lincoln and Kennedy. It happens.

You've been watching too many action flicks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9Mhhvl7vWk


As for the thermite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWpC_1WP8do


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPqxJpykW00
 

Fireworks

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Wait, let me drop this bomb real quick: Most people don't know this but, Osama Bin Laden was a C.I.A Agent in the 80's. (Specifically 1986) so yes. I do believe it was an inside job. If you would like more information: