Philly said:Send him a pm, there is nothing we can do. If you want revenge, and want to give him a negative rep back than upgrade.
Chronos said:Check your rep. Follow what I said.
Gumm said:thank you bro!! and this is what stamp said in the desccription
Stamp (25) - Last updated 02-15-2012, 09:48 PM [Report Rating]
Negative (-5): i have a life thank you, why dont you get one and stop spamming your shit gamertags
Chronos said:I saw. He's just on a power trip, thinking he's the shit. I don't support revenge-repping, but he only gave you the rep because you can't negative rep him back. Let him know how you feel once you upgrade.
Buyars said:lol watch when/if he upgrades the guy is going to remove the rep
Gumm said:i would never give someone else negative rep. thats just not nice. i mean im a good member and he says im "spamming" the forums with my gts. all im trying to do is make deals with people and get rid of them.
Zeus said:You were spamming every thread with the same thing, there's a rep system for a reason, don't get mad about getting negative rep. Did you ever think that Stamp thought you deserved negative rep.
I can agree with you to a certain point, that your shouldn't revenge rep. But that's one of the features of being a donator or upgrading to Onyx right to? To be able to rep someone if you feel that its for a suitable reason. Stamp has a right to neg rep someone if he feels if it was for good reason.Chronos said:He could've pmed him about it, rather then leaving a low-quality rep for the sole reason that Gumm can't do the same to him.
Zeus said:I can agree with you to a certain point, that your shouldn't revenge rep. But that's one of the features of being a donator or upgrading to Onyx right to? To be able to rep someone if you feel that its for a suitable reason. Stamp has a right to neg rep someone if he feels if it was for good reason.
Chronos said:You should upgrade to support the site, not because you're such a failure in life that you need to feel power over other people by paying money. I would never negative rep a member unless they are a scammer, or disrespecting Staff/Philly. If you need to resort to reputation to end an argument, then you've truly lost.
Zeus said:You make valid points, still in my eyes I personally think Gumm shouldn't haven't made such a fuss over it.
Chronos said:I think Stamp is the one making a fuss. He could've easily just asked Gumm to calm down on the posting and it would've been over. However, he felt the need to give Gumm negative reputation without even letting Gumm have a word in the matter. Had they talked it would've been fine.
Zeus said:I don't know about other members but I personally have hinted towards Gumm that he is spamming post with the same thing, but I see what your saying Stamp should of PM'ed Gumm before resorting to giving neg rep.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?