• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

Why I personally believe 9/11 may not be as it appeared.

Bit

User is banned.
Reputation
0
9/11 we'll never forget that day...

This might make me sound a little crazy, maybe I am, but I honestly believe there was more to 9/11 than was let on.

Before I go any further please read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories

Now here's my take on it, I'll leave out the numbers and income figures because I'm too lazy to research them all myself feel free to add them if you'd like to, oil runs the world, literally and if you follow the money trails every single time you purchased oil you were indirectly funding Al Qaeda, which as we all know hates America and wishes to see us torn to the ground.

So with us spending approximately 700 billion dollars a year on oil, (I'll be sparing and say that only 10% of that money went to fund Al Qaeda and similar organizations, when in reality it was likely more) every time you filled up the tank our enemies grew stronger and not to mention they controlled the supply of it, and thus they could dictate prices to be whatever they want (to an extent).

The way I see it is this, if 20 years passed, taking into account inflation and the price gouging of oil that's approximately 2.5-3 trillion dollars directly funded to our enemies. America is worth about 70t if I'm right. (Might want to check http://usdebtclock.org) That's about 5% of our nations worth over only 20 years, assuming they just sat on the money and didn't use it to make more money, and that's also assuming our economy continued to expand at the rates it originally was (not very likely). 100 years down the line which isn't too long when you're playing that game, it would be a significant threat to us, enough to potentially over throw us under the proper circumstances.

Now, this is where the politics come into play; see we as the USA are forced to abide and play by certain rules set forth by the UN. One of these rules is that, basically, we can't just invade another country for their resources, not only would it make us look bad it would have other nations thinking something along the lines of "What's stopping them from deciding they want our resources and taking them next"? Which would lead to WWIII (by the time you're reading it could be WWlV), and have the whole world at our throats, so that option is ruled out.

Our only other feasible and swift option, that I can think of, is to stage an attack, or according to some sources turn a blind eye to it, if they throw the first stone at us we're free to retaliate without fear of too many repercussions, sure it cost us a trillion+ dollars on the war (money which ultimately went back into the economy since we build all of our own war machines VIA private contractors) and the twin towers/pentagon (I don't know their value). Yet in the end, as a business expense it's worth it. We go there under false pretenses, get rid of who's in charge (remember when Saddam was torching the oil wells? He knew what we were after).

Well I'll probably add onto this later but I'm getting tired, if you have anything to add post it here and I'll try my best to work it in.

I hope that was enlightening, and maybe it was just good timing on our part but I honestly don't believe in coincidence, and they had to of known we would get UN clearance to retaliate if they attacked us first.
 

Aura

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
How relevant is the theory if we can't prove it?
 

Nevermind

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Well first of all, the first source you cited was Wikipedia. You can never trust this site, because anyone can change it. It's not a very reliable source to base an opinion off of. The rest of what you have written is all opinion, or why you think it may have been feasible. There is no real evidence used to support it.
 

Slacker

User is banned.
Reputation
0
I have a few opinions on this as well....I will keep it brief on your thread but if any one wishes to know more feel free to ask.

The towers were destroyed by an implosion. This is the same method used for deconstructing buildings and structures. For those who do not know what an Implosion is, look HERE. If a plane were to fly into a building it would be an Explosion. architects and engineers have both studied this and confirmed under a sworn oath, they also stated that the heat from the fire would not reach a high enough temperature to melt steel in the fashion that the structural steel was melted.

Homeland security was actually in NY training for a nation disaster like this during the time period of this happening, I would consider this a coincidence, but for the sandy hook shooting and a few other national disasters there were in those area training for those disasters...

The news coverage of the second plane hitting was sketchy as well. The guy said "And then I seen the second plane hit the other tower" at least 15 seconds before it hit, that was not lag between the camera and the station, it was a pre planned witness statement. The people that were involved in that interview were known "actors: hired by the government for eye witness statements like this.

ALOT of the workers called off work that day, alot meaning the majority of the buildings employees. I have alot of evidence to back my theories up and if any one would like to discuss them you know my contact methods.
 

Summon

User is banned.
Reputation
0
I'm not going to debate or provide evidence (do your own research instead of expecting others to do it for you you lazy fucks), but my belief is that 9/11 was an inside job that was meant to be a false flag terrorist attack to provide an excuse to start a war. There were way too many coincidences just like Slacker mentioned. For those saying it was not an inside job because there is no proof, you can't prove that it wasn't either.
 

Profanity

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Awaiting @"Cann!bal"'s reply, lol.
If he has one, ofcourse. :p.
 

Summon

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Slacker said:
@skunk read my reply it is my own research sir

You weren't the one I was talking to, I could tell that you did your own research.
 

Bit

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Leader said:
Well first of all, the first source you cited was Wikipedia. You can never trust this site, because anyone can change it. It's not a very reliable source to base an opinion off of. The rest of what you have written is all opinion, or why you think it may have been feasible. There is no real evidence used to support it.

That was simply to get people up to speed on what most conspiracy theories about it pertain to. Should dig a little more rather than just write it off.


Alt said:
How relevant is the theory if we can't prove it?

The numbers are there.

By "relevant" you mean relevant to what?
 

Aura

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Bit said:
That was simply to get people up to speed on what most conspiracy theories about it pertain to. Should dig a little more rather than just write it off.



The numbers are there.

By "relevant" you mean relevant to what?



Well, I suppose anything is relevant to discuss. But beyond that, no action can be taken place unless something can be proven. Just dont see the point in speculating anymore. Its been 12 years. Im not saying it should be swept under the carpet like dust, but what exactly are we going to do about it?
 

Bit

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Alt said:
Well, I suppose anything is relevant to discuss. But beyond that, no action can be taken place unless something can be proven. Just dont see the point in speculating anymore. Its been 12 years. Im not saying it should be swept under the carpet like dust, but what exactly are we going to do about it?

Satisfy our curiosity, learn from the whole experience.
 

Hope

Power member.
Reputation
0
I personally don't believe the Gov would be behind this. I also feel this was planned. Idk what to say man.
 

Bump Bot

Active Member
Reputation
-1
While we are at it have you guy noticed if you make a triangle out of paper it can be a illuminati symbol and that means they control what we write.
 

HUNNID

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Leader said:
Well first of all, the first source you cited was Wikipedia. You can never trust this site, because anyone can change it. It's not a very reliable source to base an opinion off of. The rest of what you have written is all opinion, or why you think it may have been feasible. There is no real evidence used to support it.

Come on Leader please don't say that about Wikipedia..You and I both know and I'm almost positive 90% of the world knows that wikipedia is a great website. Even though you can input information most pages on Wiki are locked and monitored. So this means you can not just put some random information in there. Also people who do put the information on Wiki have to cite there sources and the information isn't immediately put onto the website it has to go through 2-3 Moderators/People who work for Wiki to determine if this information is correct. Also this all depends on what kind of Page it is. So if its a page about lets say The United States it will be deeply monitored and most likely locked so people can not input information onto the page. Now lets say its Tosh.0 he lets anyone do anything they want to his Wiki Page (At least he did for 1 TV Show) But my point is that WikiPedia in fact is a very very Reliable source.


Hope said:
I personally don't believe the Gov would be behind this. I also feel this was planned. Idk what to say man.

Lets just think about all the laws that were passed after 9/11 Happened such as the patriot act and many others that took away almost everyones rights. Also don't forget about the multi-millions that some how went missing. Countries all around the world have committed terrorist acts upon themselves all through out history. Personally I don't know what to believe, but I am extremely sceptic when it comes to stuff like this.
 

Astro

User is banned.
Reputation
0
The majority of the USA's recent disasters were immediately followed up with changes in policies in government.
An example of this was the bombing of Boston's marathon, headlining the world's news for at least a week, giving them the opportunity to pass whatever policies they felt like.

I'm not pointing the finger at the government being behind said disasters, but they sure know when to time their changes in law.


On the topic of 9/11 though, there was definitely something sketchy about the whole thing. The media blew it out of proportion, the people of America were essentially up in arms against the 'terrorists' that it gave the military the green light to 'retaliate'.
 

Bit

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Astro said:
The majority of the USA's recent disasters were immediately followed up with changes in policies in government.
An example of this was the bombing of Boston's marathon, headlining the world's news for at least a week, giving them the opportunity to pass whatever policies they felt like.

I'm not pointing the finger at the government being behind said disasters, but they sure know when to time their changes in law.


On the topic of 9/11 though, there was definitely something sketchy about the whole thing. The media blew it out of proportion, the people of America were essentially up in arms against the 'terrorists' that it gave the military the green light to 'retaliate'.

Well said my friend. Very well said. Kudos.
 

Yeti

Active Member
Reputation
0
Bit said:
Please don't troll man, Idc in any of my other threads but this is meant to be a serious discussion, thanks.

Aight ill respect that, but honestly I don't think anyone did it for a specific reason. I do not think it was rigged. When you think of a world with (what?) 7.13 billion people there HAS to be at least one giant murder happen. And honestly worse has happened outside of the United States. The thing is the US is so sensitive to deaths like these.
 

Spectre

User is banned.
Reputation
0
9/11 was real but no one will ever no what actually happened. the fbi cia all took the evidence and will never see it. its sad bc all those ppl died for what? cause our country is stubborn and will do anything for whatever and get away with it.
 
Top