Chewboxxy said:The whole rep system is flawed and is pointless.
1) Rep for rep, that's all it is
2) Revenge rep, people are butthurt
3) Sympathy rep, butthurt people rep
4) Threads about people be repped
5) Random rep
That is about 95% rep on this forum.
Some people see rep has a way to judge people, but it's for sure not accurate.
Rep is just a game.
Chewboxxy said:The whole rep system is flawed and is pointless.
1) Rep for rep, that's all it is
2) Revenge rep, people are butthurt
3) Sympathy rep, butthurt people rep
4) Threads about people be repped
5) Random rep
6) Do things for rep
That is about 95% rep on this forum.
Some people see rep has a way to judge people, but it's for sure not accurate.
Rep is just a game.
Agreed. If possible just remove the (-) rep... Several forums removed this thing because of abuse.Scout said:Chewboxxy said:The whole rep system is flawed and is pointless.
1) Rep for rep, that's all it is
2) Revenge rep, people are butthurt
3) Sympathy rep, butthurt people rep
4) Threads about people be repped
5) Random rep
6) Do things for rep
That is about 95% rep on this forum.
Some people see rep has a way to judge people, but it's for sure not accurate.
Rep is just a game.
On the forum I'm mod on, we just removed neg rep.
if you don't want to increase their rep. Simple, dont' rep them. There is no need to de-rep some one, rep some one when you feel fit, and when not, just let it go.
Should remove neg rep here imo.
xzile said:removing the (-) rep would solve the problem. Go ahead and put neutral if you want, but it means nothing.
otherwise, all that there will be is (+) rep.
Though, that can still be abused. But that's why there is a text box for people to say why the repped them the way they did. People will read them and determine whether or not the rep is legit.
Scout said:xzile said:removing the (-) rep would solve the problem. Go ahead and put neutral if you want, but it means nothing.
otherwise, all that there will be is (+) rep.
Though, that can still be abused. But that's why there is a text box for people to say why the repped them the way they did. People will read them and determine whether or not the rep is legit.
Rep means nothing when it comes to being legit anyways... Woopdidoo i got a bunch of kids who de-repped me for being a ass hole. Don't see how that's relevant to trading one bit.
Jonathan said:It can be abused to give bias opinions on members which could put-off new members from communicating with said individuals.
No, I read your post and I'm saying it doesn't matter if +repping was abused because it doesn't matter for trading lolxzile said:Scout said:xzile said:removing the (-) rep would solve the problem. Go ahead and put neutral if you want, but it means nothing.
otherwise, all that there will be is (+) rep.
Though, that can still be abused. But that's why there is a text box for people to say why the repped them the way they did. People will read them and determine whether or not the rep is legit.
Rep means nothing when it comes to being legit anyways... Woopdidoo i got a bunch of kids who de-repped me for being a ass hole. Don't see how that's relevant to trading one bit.
Did you not read what I said clearly? You should try rereading it
I said to get rid of negative rep, keep positive, and make sure the positives are legit. A legit rep would be giving somebody + rep for them actually doing something nice/good. Like, a good trade. While putting a vouch, they could also +rep them. If a trade with the player went bad, they could negative vouch them, and leave a nuteral rep saying "beware of this player, look at vouches!" or something (example)
A non-legit rep would be a +rep saying something that has nothing to do with being a good person/doing something good.
Though in the end, no. Rep means nothing, and i have said that multiple times. I'm just thinking outside of the box as I say this.I wouldn't care either way if rep stayed or went.
Scout said:No, I read your post and I'm saying it doesn't matter if +repping was abused because it doesn't matter for trading lolxzile said:Scout said:Rep means nothing when it comes to being legit anyways... Woopdidoo i got a bunch of kids who de-repped me for being a ass hole. Don't see how that's relevant to trading one bit.
Did you not read what I said clearly? You should try rereading it
I said to get rid of negative rep, keep positive, and make sure the positives are legit. A legit rep would be giving somebody + rep for them actually doing something nice/good. Like, a good trade. While putting a vouch, they could also +rep them. If a trade with the player went bad, they could negative vouch them, and leave a nuteral rep saying "beware of this player, look at vouches!" or something (example)
A non-legit rep would be a +rep saying something that has nothing to do with being a good person/doing something good.
Though in the end, no. Rep means nothing, and i have said that multiple times. I'm just thinking outside of the box as I say this.I wouldn't care either way if rep stayed or went.
xzile said:Scout said:No, I read your post and I'm saying it doesn't matter if +repping was abused because it doesn't matter for trading lolxzile said:Did you not read what I said clearly? You should try rereading it
I said to get rid of negative rep, keep positive, and make sure the positives are legit. A legit rep would be giving somebody + rep for them actually doing something nice/good. Like, a good trade. While putting a vouch, they could also +rep them. If a trade with the player went bad, they could negative vouch them, and leave a nuteral rep saying "beware of this player, look at vouches!" or something (example)
A non-legit rep would be a +rep saying something that has nothing to do with being a good person/doing something good.
Though in the end, no. Rep means nothing, and i have said that multiple times. I'm just thinking outside of the box as I say this.I wouldn't care either way if rep stayed or went.
Then just ignore the rep and look at vouches. If you prefer to trade more than anything, just look at vouches. Rep has nothing to do with trading either way
Chewboxxy said:xzile said:Scout said:No, I read your post and I'm saying it doesn't matter if +repping was abused because it doesn't matter for trading lol
Then just ignore the rep and look at vouches. If you prefer to trade more than anything, just look at vouches. Rep has nothing to do with trading either way
Would you rather trade with someone with +100 or -100 rep?
Scout said:Chewboxxy said:xzile said:Then just ignore the rep and look at vouches. If you prefer to trade more than anything, just look at vouches. Rep has nothing to do with trading either way
Would you rather trade with someone with +100 or -100 rep?
Doesnt' matter to me, I wouldn't go first regardless. Nor do I accept paypal from randoms\low vouches. So their rep is still irrelevant to me.
They could have 4741489031 -rep, ill trade with the person with more vouches. Rep is completely unrelated to trading, which is why you dont even see people's rep in the marketplace sectionChewboxxy said:xzile said:Scout said:No, I read your post and I'm saying it doesn't matter if +repping was abused because it doesn't matter for trading lol
Then just ignore the rep and look at vouches. If you prefer to trade more than anything, just look at vouches. Rep has nothing to do with trading either way
Would you rather trade with someone with +100 or -100 rep?
Reaper said:I dis-agree. I think it's fine to leave rep on, it's just rep. Negative rep is for people who think negatively of someone. Neutral, is eh, just that. I think it's fine the way it is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?