• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

9/11 was an inside job.

Crucifix

Active Member
Reputation
0
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Justin said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Okay? Then what's there not to get?

I don't get how you can be so closed minded.

Closed minded? It's nothing to be closed minded about, it's pretty fucking obvious that 2 planes hit 2 towers? OR UNLESS THEY ARE HOLOGRAPHIC PLANES.

Please, spill some more non-sense, keep the rebuttal civil, and argue. You're obviously gonna just put some more bull-shit down to make yourself feel happy. But I'd like you to disprove me.
You're not that smart aren't you? Those buildings were designed to take on a Boeing plane,it's impossible that a plane would've made those two buildings collapse and also another building (WTC7) If I'm not mistaken. suddenly collapse "reason": "flying debris" really? A huge building collapses because of flying debris,I dont think so.

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/3873416/1/
 

Danger Close

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Justin said:
I don't get how you can be so closed minded.

Closed minded? It's nothing to be closed minded about, it's pretty fucking obvious that 2 planes hit 2 towers? OR UNLESS THEY ARE HOLOGRAPHIC PLANES.

Please, spill some more non-sense, keep the rebuttal civil, and argue. You're obviously gonna just put some more bull-shit down to make yourself feel happy. But I'd like you to disprove me.
You're not that smart aren't you? Those buildings were designed to take on a Boeing plane,it's impossible that a plane would've made those two buildings collapse and also another building (WTC7) If I'm not mistaken suddenly collapsed reason: "flying debrie" really? A huge building collapses because of flying debrie,I dont think so.

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/3873416/1/

It can take a building. But it was the fuel inside the plane that weakened the steel bars and it made it very un-sturdy.

Also, WTC 7 was hit by falling debris.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwdD6ERutEI[/yt]
 

Crucifix

Active Member
Reputation
0
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Closed minded? It's nothing to be closed minded about, it's pretty fucking obvious that 2 planes hit 2 towers? OR UNLESS THEY ARE HOLOGRAPHIC PLANES.

Please, spill some more non-sense, keep the rebuttal civil, and argue. You're obviously gonna just put some more bull-shit down to make yourself feel happy. But I'd like you to disprove me.
You're not that smart aren't you? Those buildings were designed to take on a Boeing plane,it's impossible that a plane would've made those two buildings collapse and also another building (WTC7) If I'm not mistaken suddenly collapsed reason: "flying debrie" really? A huge building collapses because of flying debrie,I dont think so.

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/3873416/1/

It can take a building. But it was the fuel inside the plane that weakened the steel bars and it made it very un-sturdy.

Also, WTC 7 was hit by falling debris.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwdD6ERutEI[/yt]
Very unsturdy? So yeah that's really strong steel that heat would've never molted a bit,and just like I said WTC7 was hit by falling debris how the hell can a building collapse by falling debris?
 

Danger Close

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
You're not that smart aren't you? Those buildings were designed to take on a Boeing plane,it's impossible that a plane would've made those two buildings collapse and also another building (WTC7) If I'm not mistaken suddenly collapsed reason: "flying debrie" really? A huge building collapses because of flying debrie,I dont think so.

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/3873416/1/

It can take a building. But it was the fuel inside the plane that weakened the steel bars and it made it very un-sturdy.

Also, WTC 7 was hit by falling debris.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwdD6ERutEI[/yt]
Very unsturdy? So yeah that's really strong steel that heat would've never molted a bit,and just like I said WTC7 was hit by falling debris how the hell can a building collapse by falling debris?

Those steel bars are like 5 tons, and when you look at this picture, it clearly shows the building being smacked with tons and tons of debris on one side.

Jet fuel can melt the steel down to a point to where it can't hold itself anymore.

0fa7339480af.jpg
 

Crucifix

Active Member
Reputation
0
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
It can take a building. But it was the fuel inside the plane that weakened the steel bars and it made it very un-sturdy.

Also, WTC 7 was hit by falling debris.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwdD6ERutEI[/yt]
Very unsturdy? So yeah that's really strong steel that heat would've never molted a bit,and just like I said WTC7 was hit by falling debris how the hell can a building collapse by falling debris?

Those steel bars are like 5 tons, and when you look at this picture, it clearly shows the building being smacked with tons and tons of debris on one side.

Jet fuel can melt the steel down to a point to where it can't hold itself anymore.

0fa7339480af.jpg
So you're basically saying that debri can crack a very strong structured building? As you can see on a clip that it's cracks just in the middle of the building just like they do at controlled desctructions so the building will fall on itself through the middle,just like happened there. Dude it's an inside job.
 

Danger Close

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
Very unsturdy? So yeah that's really strong steel that heat would've never molted a bit,and just like I said WTC7 was hit by falling debris how the hell can a building collapse by falling debris?

Those steel bars are like 5 tons, and when you look at this picture, it clearly shows the building being smacked with tons and tons of debris on one side.

Jet fuel can melt the steel down to a point to where it can't hold itself anymore.

0fa7339480af.jpg
So you're basically saying that debri can crack a very strong structured building? As you can see on a clip that it's cracks just in the middle of the building just like they do at controlled desctructions so the building will fall on itself through the middle,just like happened there. Dude it's an inside job.

This is the most accurate floor planning they had before the building had collapsed.

pull.h1.jpg


It obviously fell backwards in the south east, as you can see.

b7debris.jpg

barclay.jpg


Unless you think the Jews did it with their might breath.
 

Crucifix

Active Member
Reputation
0
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Those steel bars are like 5 tons, and when you look at this picture, it clearly shows the building being smacked with tons and tons of debris on one side.

Jet fuel can melt the steel down to a point to where it can't hold itself anymore.

0fa7339480af.jpg
So you're basically saying that debri can crack a very strong structured building? As you can see on a clip that it's cracks just in the middle of the building just like they do at controlled desctructions so the building will fall on itself through the middle,just like happened there. Dude it's an inside job.

This is the most accurate floor planning they had before the building had collapsed.

pull.h1.jpg


It obviously fell backwards in the south east, as you can see.

b7debris.jpg

barclay.jpg


Unless you think the Jews did it with their might breath.
Ok w/e bro I'm done debating with you,as I can't change your mind and you have the right to think what ever you want.
 

Danger Close

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Also, look.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmg[/yt]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk

Before it collapsed it had a little strut on the right. Controlled demolitions CANNOT do that.

Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
So you're basically saying that debri can crack a very strong structured building? As you can see on a clip that it's cracks just in the middle of the building just like they do at controlled desctructions so the building will fall on itself through the middle,just like happened there. Dude it's an inside job.

This is the most accurate floor planning they had before the building had collapsed.

pull.h1.jpg


It obviously fell backwards in the south east, as you can see.

b7debris.jpg

barclay.jpg


Unless you think the Jews did it with their might breath.
Ok w/e bro I'm done debating with you,as I can't change your mind and you have the right to think what ever you want.

You haven't even provided me ONE piece of conclusive evidence to go against mine. You can believe whatever you want, because I have science on my side.
 

Crucifix

Active Member
Reputation
0
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Also, look.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmg[/yt]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk

Before it collapsed it had a little strut on the right. Controlled demolitions CANNOT do that.

Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
This is the most accurate floor planning they had before the building had collapsed.

pull.h1.jpg


It obviously fell backwards in the south east, as you can see.

b7debris.jpg

barclay.jpg


Unless you think the Jews did it with their might breath.
Ok w/e bro I'm done debating with you,as I can't change your mind and you have the right to think what ever you want.

You haven't even provided me ONE piece of conclusive evidence to go against mine. You can believe whatever you want, because I have science on my side.

Dude it's 6AM where I am,do you really think I'm going to search evidence to proof this to you? No way.
 

Danger Close

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Also, look.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmg[/yt]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk

Before it collapsed it had a little strut on the right. Controlled demolitions CANNOT do that.

Aridity said:
Ok w/e bro I'm done debating with you,as I can't change your mind and you have the right to think what ever you want.

You haven't even provided me ONE piece of conclusive evidence to go against mine. You can believe whatever you want, because I have science on my side.

Dude it's 6AM where I am,do you really think I'm going to search evidence to proof this to you? No way.





'Cause you can't. :)

Also, on another note. Quit trying to say pull a conspiracy theory when you don't even live in America.
 

Danger Close

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Aridity said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
My evidence is in the OP.

A video? Not even a credible source bro.

See, storm troops are real.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5gCeWEGiQI[/yt]
Actually they are multiple videos. And why can't I discuss a conspiracy theory if I dont live in America?

Same thing with Star Wars bro, YouTube is SUCH a credible source.

It's being a hypocrite. You bitch about something that happened to America when you don't even live in the country.
 

Manatee

Active Member
Reputation
0
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
My evidence is in the OP.

A video? Not even a credible source bro.

See, storm troops are real.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5gCeWEGiQI[/yt]

Honestly, if you don't even have a thought about it being a conspiracy you ARE closed minded.

How can a plane go into the middle of the building to make the bottom collapse?
shouldn't the middle collapse followed by the top?

Watch the video that Aridity put in his OP.

It shows at the beginning it going down, like sinking into the concrete.

Im not saying it WAS a conspiracy, I just believe it to be like that.

I have seen enough documentaries and evidence that i can make out my own conclusion.
 

Crucifix

Active Member
Reputation
0
Justin said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
My evidence is in the OP.

A video? Not even a credible source bro.

See, storm troops are real.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5gCeWEGiQI[/yt]

Honestly, if you don't even have a thought about it being a conspiracy you ARE closed minded.

How can a plane go into the middle of the building to make the bottom collapse?
shouldn't the middle collapse followed by the top?

Watch the video that Aridity put in his OP.

It shows at the beginning it going down, like sinking into the concrete.

Im not saying it WAS a conspiracy, I just believe it to be like that.

I have seen enough documentaries and evidence that i can make out my own conclusion.
Well said Justin well said,Now come on Hannah montana reply on this comment.
 

Danger Close

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Justin said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Aridity said:
My evidence is in the OP.

A video? Not even a credible source bro.

See, storm troops are real.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5gCeWEGiQI[/yt]

Honestly, if you don't even have a thought about it being a conspiracy you ARE closed minded.

How can a plane go into the middle of the building to make the bottom collapse?
shouldn't the middle collapse followed by the top?

Watch the video that Aridity put in his OP.

It shows at the beginning it going down, like sinking into the concrete.

Im not saying it WAS a conspiracy, I just believe it to be like that.

I have seen enough documentaries and evidence that i can make out my own conclusion.

I'm not closed minded, I'm not stupid. I research myself before I say anything, unlike people going "ITSUH CUNSPIRICEY WUTCHA AS SUM RED STALFF FALLS OUT DUH BILDING". No.

It definitely started to collapse exactly where the plane was hit smart one.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QChWMNRo3h0[/yt]

You have a fucking 330,000 lb plane SMACKING the building at 545 MPH.

Aridity said:
Justin said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
A video? Not even a credible source bro.

See, storm troops are real.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5gCeWEGiQI[/yt]

Honestly, if you don't even have a thought about it being a conspiracy you ARE closed minded.

How can a plane go into the middle of the building to make the bottom collapse?
shouldn't the middle collapse followed by the top?

Watch the video that Aridity put in his OP.

It shows at the beginning it going down, like sinking into the concrete.

Im not saying it WAS a conspiracy, I just believe it to be like that.

I have seen enough documentaries and evidence that i can make out my own conclusion.
Well said Justin well said,Now come on Hannah montana reply on this comment.

Just did, now he needs to reply.
 

Manatee

Active Member
Reputation
0
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Justin said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
A video? Not even a credible source bro.

See, storm troops are real.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5gCeWEGiQI[/yt]

Honestly, if you don't even have a thought about it being a conspiracy you ARE closed minded.

How can a plane go into the middle of the building to make the bottom collapse?
shouldn't the middle collapse followed by the top?

Watch the video that Aridity put in his OP.

It shows at the beginning it going down, like sinking into the concrete.

Im not saying it WAS a conspiracy, I just believe it to be like that.

I have seen enough documentaries and evidence that i can make out my own conclusion.

I'm not closed minded, I'm not stupid. I research myself before I say anything, unlike people going "ITSUH CUNSPIRICEY WUTCHA AS SUM RED STALFF FALLS OUT DUH BILDING". No.

It definitely started to collapse exactly where the plane was hit smart one.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QChWMNRo3h0[/yt]

When did i say it didn't collapse because of the plane?
Of course it will collapse from a dang plane smashing into the side of it.
If it didn't it wouldn't be a realistic building.
This building wasn't made to get hit by a plane and survive.
Once that plane hit the tower, it was going down anyway. Even if there wasn't a bomb or anything at the bottom.

A 767 Plane hit the tower. The tower was made to withstand 706 or 707s. (Forgot which ones)

Correct me if im wrong, i got this out of evidence.
 

Phantomkiller42

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Don't know what you're really trying to say, Justin.

At first it sounded like you were defending the op, now it looks like your against it.

Anyways, all those conspiracy crap is just bullshit.

Some of you guys obviously don't know the power of fire.
 

Danger Close

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Justin said:
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Justin said:
Honestly, if you don't even have a thought about it being a conspiracy you ARE closed minded.

How can a plane go into the middle of the building to make the bottom collapse?
shouldn't the middle collapse followed by the top?

Watch the video that Aridity put in his OP.

It shows at the beginning it going down, like sinking into the concrete.

Im not saying it WAS a conspiracy, I just believe it to be like that.

I have seen enough documentaries and evidence that i can make out my own conclusion.

I'm not closed minded, I'm not stupid. I research myself before I say anything, unlike people going "ITSUH CUNSPIRICEY WUTCHA AS SUM RED STALFF FALLS OUT DUH BILDING". No.

It definitely started to collapse exactly where the plane was hit smart one.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QChWMNRo3h0[/yt]

When did i say it didn't collapse because of the plane?
Of course it will collapse from a dang plane smashing into the side of it.
If it didn't it wouldn't be a realistic building.
This building wasn't made to get hit by a plane and survive.
Once that plane hit the tower, it was going down anyway. Even if there wasn't a bomb or anything at the bottom.

A 767 Plane hit the tower. The tower was made to withstand 706 or 707s. (Forgot which ones)

Correct me if im wrong, i got this out of evidence.

You said it smashed in the middle and started to fall at ground level. Lol.

Also, the building can withstand the plane itself. What about the fuel inside of it? Melting the steel bars all over until the steel is weak enough to just fall.

Phantomkiller42 said:
Don't know what you're really trying to say, Justin.

At first it sounded like you were defending the op, now it looks like your against it.

Anyways, all those conspiracy crap is just bullshit.

Some of you guys obviously don't know the power of fire.

Thermodynamics ftw.
 
Top