Ban Social Engineering.

[Vanquish]

The definition of "Social Engineering" is not receiving free things from people.
Have you ever studied SEing? If anything it makes you more intelligent and you're more aware about your surroundings.
I'm glad that I've taken that in as a part of my life.

---

however it is a form of hacking so If i see it I won't allow it

This is human manipulation, how the hell is this hacking?

---

New favourite staff member, can I hug you, oh wait, were low life's, we only do bad stuff.

---

Thanks, I think.
There are more SE users on this forum than OP knows of.

 

[EAF]

The definition of "Social Engineering" is not receiving free things from people.
Have you ever studied SEing? If anything it makes you more intelligent and you're more aware about your surroundings.
I'm glad that I've taken that in as a part of my life.

---

This is human manipulation, how the hell is this hacking?

---

New favourite staff member, can I hug you, oh wait, were low life's, we only do bad stuff.

---

Thanks, I think.
There are more SE users on this forum than OP knows of.

---

Wouldn't that be flaming?
Technically he is calling SE'rs "low life's" it's flaming fellow members, which I do believe is against the rules.

 

[Copper]

I asked Carbon about se'ing about a month ago and he said its not allowed.

 

[EAF]

I asked Carbon about se'ing about a month ago and he said its not allowed.

Techno, browsed my tread, he didn't trash it or anything.

 

[Vanquish]

New favourite staff member, can I hug you, oh wait, were low life's, we only do bad stuff.

Thanks, I think.
There are more SE users on this forum than OP knows of.

Wouldn't that be flaming?
Technically he is calling SE'rs "low life's" it's flaming fellow members, which I do believe is against the rules.

Not really, I feel it'd only be flaming if he is directing it towards a member or more than one member.
Example: "Dude, you're the lowest life to walk upon the scum of the earth."

I just noticed that the rule 11 is in effect, and I didn't even see it last night.
The discussion of Social Engineering should be allowed from what I can notice, and only teaching others are against the rules.

 

[EAF]

Thanks, I think.
There are more SE users on this forum than OP knows of.

Wouldn't that be flaming?
Technically he is calling SE'rs "low life's" it's flaming fellow members, which I do believe is against the rules.

Not really, I feel it'd only be flaming if he is directing it towards a member or more than one member.
Example: "Dude, you're the lowest life to walk upon the scum of the earth."

I just noticed that the rule 11 is in effect, and I didn't even see it last night.
The discussion of Social Engineering should be allowed from what I can notice, and only teaching others are against the rules.

Alright, he directed it towards menin the thread oxide trashed I believe saying I was a low life for doing this, and also, I hope the Admins have similar opinions.

 

[Techno]

I don't see it hacking unless you are manipulating RS players. If it's pretending to be someone for something it's not hacking.

 

[Fafaffy]

imho, delete all the threads that aren't Social Engineering. Social Engineering is the act of manipulating someone to your favor, doesn't have to be just getting free shit from major companies. Also, getting free shit from them is just plain fraud.

 

[EAF]

/thread, OP, I think the point has been proven.

---

Also, can I have my thread back, with all nonsense deleted, please and thanks.

 

[Tyler-]

Shouldnt be banned, isnt much threads on it anyway

 

[Bmthrules]

I agree, I've seen SEing and Fraud go hand in hand.

 

[Mc. Donalds]

I agree, I've seen SEing and Fraud go hand in hand.

*CLICK CLCK* BOOM.

The boss has spoken.

 

[Automatic]

I agree, I've seen SEing and Fraud go hand in hand.

*CLICK CLCK* BOOM.

The boss has spoken.

>Implying carbon can do shit, owner or gtfo. (though, for this matter I think techno can do it. But still, fuck techno. Owner or gtfo)

 

[Bmthrules]

I agree, I've seen SEing and Fraud go hand in hand.

*CLICK CLCK* BOOM.

The boss has spoken.

>Implying carbon can do shit, owner or gtfo. (though, for this matter I think techno can do it. But still, F*ck techno. Owner or gtfo)

If I can't do anything, I wonder what position that puts you in.

 

[Automatic]

*CLICK CLCK* BOOM.

The boss has spoken.

>Implying carbon can do shit, owner or gtfo. (though, for this matter I think techno can do it. But still, F*ck techno. Owner or gtfo)

If I can't do anything, I wonder what position that puts you in.

Exact same as you. Makes your 'SUPER' mod seem useless, eh?

//Incomingwarning/limit/ban.

P.S. I need 20% more warning for a limit, encase super-mod doesn't give you the option to view my warning percentage.

 

[Relapse]

I agree, I've seen SEing and Fraud go hand in hand.

That's like saying guns and murder go hand in hand. One isn't always used for the other.

 

[Bmthrules]

>Implying carbon can do shit, owner or gtfo. (though, for this matter I think techno can do it. But still, F*ck techno. Owner or gtfo)

If I can't do anything, I wonder what position that puts you in.

Exact same as you. Makes your 'SUPER' mod seem useless, eh?

//Incomingwarning/limit/ban.

P.S. I need 20% more warning for a limit, encase super-mod doesn't give you the option to view my warning percentage.

I don't need to use a warning, or a limit to put someone in there place.

 

[Automatic]

If I can't do anything, I wonder what position that puts you in.

Exact same as you. Makes your 'SUPER' mod seem useless, eh?

//Incomingwarning/limit/ban.

P.S. I need 20% more warning for a limit, encase super-mod doesn't give you the option to view my warning percentage.

I don't need to use a warning, or a limit to put someone in there place.

Well, least you have that on your side.

 

[Bmthrules]

I agree, I've seen SEing and Fraud go hand in hand.

That's like saying guns and murder go hand in hand. One isn't always used for the other.

There used for many things, not all good.

 

[Relapse]

I agree, I've seen SEing and Fraud go hand in hand.

That's like saying guns and murder go hand in hand. One isn't always used for the other.

There used for many things, not all good.

Not all bad either :thumbsup:

I don't think SEing should be banned all together, but ya ban ones related to fraud