Nab said:Some say that suicide is simply a way for nature to weed out the weak, what do you think @Envy, what's your personal opinion?
Envy said:[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]I have thought long about selfishness. One way to explain my conclusion is that, it is selfish, all things considered, to put a minor interest of my own ahead of a serious interest of someone else. Another way to put it, and one that captures more dimensions of the problem, is to say that it is selfish to not display the generosity that can reasonably be expected by people in a particular relationship. [/font]
And this is the essential disagreement as to the selfishness of suicide: whether it is reasonable to expect someone to continue to live a miserable life for the sake of the feelings of his friends and family. I suspect that most people cannot imagine that life could be so bad that one's suffering could outweigh that of one's friends left behind. It may be impossible to accurately measure or assess the difference in suffering between those who want to commit suicide, and those who mourn the deceased from suicide. Almost certainly, it varies.
An interesting outcome of this is that, by this definition, the suicide of a person with NO friends or relatives is not selfish at all, even if he is only experiencing slight suffering. On the other hand, the suicide of a person with many friends and relatives may be very selfish, regardless of the magnitude of suffering. But certainly it is a bit rich to assume that, in all cases, the suffering of the would-be suicide is outweighed by the possible suffering of his friends and family from being deprived of his company. In fact, in many cases, it must be selfish - even indecent - for a suicidal person's friends and family to expect him/her to continue living, if his/her suffering is so powerful in magnitude.
Suicidal people who feel that their lives are not worth living, but, nonetheless, should continue living for the sake of saving their friends/family from pain. Is this merely what is expected of them? If one's suffering is so great that one prays for death every day, and yet continues to live to spare one's friends and family the pain of the lack of one's company, we must certainly say that for that person, merely living is a selfless act.
@"Cann!bal"
Envy said:The late Jean Amery, in his masterful work 'On Suicide', claimed that the majority of the population progresses through their decision making with the "logic of life" in mind. That is, they begin from a conditioned supposition that having a life is good and so maintaining one and keeping one at all costs is sacred. This is not simply in a religious context, but down to the core of the very values that keep our species, its hierarchies and systems, its family units and social circles, churning along. Anti-suicide crusaders are not uniformly right wing loons. In fact, it is likely that one would not encounter any more conservatives than liberals within the ranks of such organizations. And yet, from these widely respected tanks of thought one is treated to the same sort of data skewing and guilt pushing found at pro-life rallies. With regard to suicide, this community works together through enormous political divides to take away a person's ability to quickly and safely end their own life. They have decided for you that your life is worth keeping whether you think so or not, no matter how sick you are, no matter how lonely or grief-stricken you are, no matter, no matter. The executive decision works to take away your greatest liberty, which is an individual's choice to discontinue being.
The prohibition is not directly carried out by jail sentences and fines. Rather, we have subtly given the reigns to the medical complex who, working in conjunction with officials, confines and medicates a potential suicide against his will (or, later, confines and medicates him post-attempt). Operating from the assumption that taking one's life is inherently irrational, the suicide is automatically given the status of an insane person. For me, this is the crux of the entire debate. The majority of people, drilled with lay speak about the sanctity of life from the time of birth, cannot extract themselves from that cocoon of thought. In this country (U.S.) and beyond, how are we to have an intelligent discussion about suicide when it is so broadly looked at as an act of insanity?
Collectively, we are so wounded by the prospect of death that we cannot fathom another's desire for it. We cannot accept that many people choose non-existence while sound of mind.
This places us, intellectually, in about the sixth grade.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?