The late Jean Amery, in his masterful work 'On Suicide', claimed that the majority of the population progresses through their decision making with the "logic of life" in mind. That is, they begin from a conditioned supposition that having a life is good and so maintaining one and keeping one at all costs is sacred. This is not simply in a religious context, but down to the core of the very values that keep our species, its hierarchies and systems, its family units and social circles, churning along. Anti-suicide crusaders are not uniformly right wing loons. In fact, it is likely that one would not encounter any more conservatives than liberals within the ranks of such organizations. And yet, from these widely respected tanks of thought one is treated to the same sort of data skewing and guilt pushing found at pro-life rallies. With regard to suicide, this community works together through enormous political divides to take away a person's ability to quickly and safely end their own life. They have decided for you that your life is worth keeping whether you think so or not, no matter how sick you are, no matter how lonely or grief-stricken you are, no matter, no matter. The executive decision works to take away your greatest liberty, which is an individual's choice to discontinue being.
The prohibition is not directly carried out by jail sentences and fines. Rather, we have subtly given the reigns to the medical complex who, working in conjunction with officials, confines and medicates a potential suicide against his will (or, later, confines and medicates him post-attempt). Operating from the assumption that taking one's life is inherently irrational, the suicide is automatically given the status of an insane person. For me, this is the crux of the entire debate. The majority of people, drilled with lay speak about the sanctity of life from the time of birth, cannot extract themselves from that cocoon of thought. In this country (U.S.) and beyond, how are we to have an intelligent discussion about suicide when it is so broadly looked at as an act of insanity?
Collectively, we are so wounded by the prospect of death that we cannot fathom another's desire for it. We cannot accept that many people choose non-existence while sound of mind.
This places us, intellectually, in about the sixth grade.
The prohibition is not directly carried out by jail sentences and fines. Rather, we have subtly given the reigns to the medical complex who, working in conjunction with officials, confines and medicates a potential suicide against his will (or, later, confines and medicates him post-attempt). Operating from the assumption that taking one's life is inherently irrational, the suicide is automatically given the status of an insane person. For me, this is the crux of the entire debate. The majority of people, drilled with lay speak about the sanctity of life from the time of birth, cannot extract themselves from that cocoon of thought. In this country (U.S.) and beyond, how are we to have an intelligent discussion about suicide when it is so broadly looked at as an act of insanity?
Collectively, we are so wounded by the prospect of death that we cannot fathom another's desire for it. We cannot accept that many people choose non-existence while sound of mind.
This places us, intellectually, in about the sixth grade.