Evolution

[Fuck]

I believe fully into some type of evolution. I do not follow any religions.

 

[Cann!bal]

There is nothing said that I blatantly disagree with.

In regards to what Pun was saying, I was merely stating that evolution differs from gravity in how it can be tested. He told me to "jump out of a window and test it" in regards to gravity, but evolution isn't the same in that it doesn't provide an immediate answer the instant I want to witness it.

Edit: I was going to ask you for an elaboration on the very beginning of life, but that's probably better placed in a different thread.

Well, I sort of already addressed that when conversing with Bit.

"To be accurate, the epoch of life as we know it didn't initiate with a single celled organism. It began with something much less complex. "

"Cells are the smallest iota of life at a conventional level, however, at a technical level it can go further. A single cell organism didn't pop out of nowhere and branch off from there. It too descended from a common ancestor and went through the process we did."

Well for me, I believe in God. I see where People come from with this whole "evolution" thing but I don't believe in it. Like turtles and tortoise or frogs and toads. They're different but not the same. There are boundaries between the genetics. I like to believe Gid made the world and in God because it give me hope. If I wasn't Christian, I wouldn't have anything to put my hope in.

Therefor, you have a really nice "theory" here but I believe that god made the earth, it's people, and everything.

I suggest you look at the evidence thoroughly before denying it because your bias says otherwise.

The thing about science is that it's true no matter what you believe.

Disregarding the enormous lack of evidence for your claims, I fail to see how you get any hope from such a barbaric faith. Knowing there's someone watching me and listening to my thoughts against my will would give me immense cognitive dissonance rather than any chance of hope. To be objected to thought-crime, where if I think wrongly, I can be punished for it, and knowing if I screw up, I will received one of the most painful punishments imaginable, risking the possibility of burning in hell for eternity with no chance of parole for thinking wrongly. No one deserves to be burned forever, not even Hitler or Stalin.

 

[Kassie]

Well, I sort of already addressed that when conversing with Bit.

"To be accurate, the epoch of life as we know it didn't initiate with a single celled organism. It began with something much less complex. "

"Cells are the smallest iota of life at a conventional level, however, at a technical level it can go further. A single cell organism didn't pop out of nowhere and branch off from there. It too descended from a common ancestor and went through the process we did."

Yes, so branching from that point: Where did life cross the line from being something nonliving to living, or has there always been something living, by definition?

 

[Cann!bal]

Yes, so branching from that point: Where did life cross the line from being something nonliving to living, or has there always been something living, by definition?

Firstly before I answer, keep in mind how life originated and how the first cell came into being are matters of educated speculation, since these events cannot be reproduced in the laboratory, however, several experiments have given us a good idea. That's an inaccuracy of Evolution. Remember Evolution is an extensive process. The first cells are predicted to have arose 750,000,000 years after the formation of Earth. And I already addressed the idea that cells are the smallest iotas of life at a conventional level. The precedes and descendents of the first celled organisms aren't necessarily life for they are not defined as life.

 

[Kassie]

Firstly before I answer, keep in mind how life originated and how the first cell came into being are matters of educated speculation, since these events cannot be reproduced in the laboratory, however, several experiments have given us a good idea. That's an inaccuracy of Evolution. Remember Evolution is an extensive process. The first cells are predicted to have arose 750,000,000 years after the formation of Earth. And I already addressed the idea that cells are the smallest iotas of life at a conventional level. The precedes and descendents of the first celled organisms aren't necessarily life for they are not defined as life.

I believe this can be put into more simple and thorough terms by stating:

Through the slow process of molecular evolution, molecules were able to organize into a system with properties consistent to a necessary biological order.

 

[Aura]

Uhh.. I wouldn't argue with @Kassie
She knows everything, bro.

Lol. Thanks for your advice, look at my rep.