Fraternization.

[eXero]

RE: Fratonization.

I agree with Gum. Problems aren't mean to just ignore.

 

[All Day Win]

RE: Fratonization.

I just don't see the point in fighting causes more problems then it solves.

If he ain't slept with yo baby momma or yo momma then what's to fight about?

 

[Manatee]

RE: Fratonization.

Too much favoritism, imo.

I just don't understand why people argue over the internet or even in real life.

Why don't we all come together and agree to disagree.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

 

[eXero]

RE: Fratonization.

That honestly made no sense ADW.

And, there is a difference in fighting and arguing.

---

Too much favoritism, imo.

I just don't understand why people argue over the internet or even in real life.

Why don't we all come together and agree to disagree.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

Good logic right there.

 

[All Day Win]

RE: Fratonization.

I agree with Gum. Problems aren't mean to just ignore.

When I mean problems I mean problems between members.

If you star a problem with someone on the internet your just looking for trouble.

 

[eXero]

RE: Fratonization.

Not if you are a good problem solver.

 

[All Day Win]

RE: Fratonization.

Too much favoritism, imo.

I just don't understand why people argue over the internet or even in real life.

Why don't we all come together and agree to disagree.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

Thats why C post a scam report on B.

---

Not if you are a good problem solver.

A good way to start a problem is not starting the problem.

 

[Manatee]

RE: Fratonization.

I just don't understand why people argue over the internet or even in real life.

Why don't we all come together and agree to disagree.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

Thats why C post a scam report on B.

How would he, if C is already banned?

see what i did thar?

 

[All Day Win]

RE: Fratonization.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

Thats why C post a scam report on B.

How would he, if C is already banned?

see what i did thar?

Implying that A is the only staff member on the fourm.

A has to give a reason why he banned B and back up the reason with proof.

I can't go around banning kids for no reason.

Also C can make a multiple account post a scam report on B and staff members D,E,F,G will get on it and A will be demoted.

Or send a pm to the head Z

 

[Cubs_mybb_import12687]

RE: Fratonization.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

Thats why C post a scam report on B.

How would he, if C is already banned?

see what i did thar?

That's some unlogical logic. Everyone on RG has Mike's msn because Mike is friends with all. Therefore they tell Mike, get unbanned and open a scam report.

 

[Danger Close]

RE: Fratonization.

Too much favoritism, imo.

I just don't understand why people argue over the internet or even in real life.

Why don't we all come together and agree to disagree.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

I agree on this logic.

 

[All Day Win]

RE: Fratonization.

I just don't understand why people argue over the internet or even in real life.

Why don't we all come together and agree to disagree.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

I agree on this logic.

I guess you didn't notice Carbon being banned and he was best buddies with all the staff?

 

[Danger Close]

RE: Fratonization.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

I agree on this logic.

I guess you didn't notice Carbon being banned and he was best buddies with all the staff?

Doesn't look banned to me now.

 

[Manatee]

RE: Fratonization.

I'm not arguing. Here this is what i mean.

Person A = Staff
Person B = Staff's friend
Person C = Randy kid

A - Hai best frand
B - Hai i scammed some guy on the forum
A - You scammed C?
B - Herp derp ye
C- ):
A - B you're innocent
A - Bans C for no reason

I agree on this logic.

I guess you didn't notice Carbon being banned and he was best buddies with all the staff?

I would like ANYONE to tell me, where I said this happened on RG. I was explaining
what I ment by favoritism. I wasn't even implying anything about RG.

 

[All Day Win]

RE: Fratonization.

I agree on this logic.

I guess you didn't notice Carbon being banned and he was best buddies with all the staff?

I would like ANYONE to tell me, where I said this happened on RG. I was explaining
what I ment by favoritism. I wasn't even implying anything about RG.

Pretty obvious.

 

[Manatee]

RE: Fratonization.

I guess you didn't notice Carbon being banned and he was best buddies with all the staff?

I would like ANYONE to tell me, where I said this happened on RG. I was explaining
what I ment by favoritism. I wasn't even implying anything about RG.

Pretty obvious.

I don't understand lol. I was just explaining what favoritism is.

 

[All Day Win]

RE: Fratonization.

I would like ANYONE to tell me, where I said this happened on RG. I was explaining
what I ment by favoritism. I wasn't even implying anything about RG.

Pretty obvious.

I don't understand lol. I was just explaining what favoritism is.

Oh well, Yes that is a pretty good example of favoritism but that fourm has to be pretty corrupt for that to happen.

 

[Manatee]

RE: Fratonization.

Pretty obvious.

I don't understand lol. I was just explaining what favoritism is.

Oh well, Yes that is a pretty good example of favoritism but that fourm has to be pretty corrupt for that to happen.

There is favoritism on this forum, but not as bad as some other forums. It isn't that corrupt. Lmao ;P

 

[Mc. Donalds]

RE: Fratonization.

Favouritism is obvious against certain members, i.e Carbon. /flameshieldon

Truth is, if you were Staff, you would be biased for your friends too, it's just the way everyone works.

 

[Danger Close]

RE: Fratonization.

Favouritism is obvious against certain members, i.e Carbon. /flameshieldon

Truth is, if you were Staff, you would be biased for your friends too, it's just the way everyone works.

Not everyone "works" that way.