Diamond Supply said:The only reason they are gay is because they like things up their butt. I'm not joking about this.
Vengeance said:I don't support gay marriage or lesbian marriage. Especially if they plan on having a child. A child needs a Woman and a man role model. Not 2 males or 2 women. We see this to so much as it is. With single mothers and fathers. Their kids start acting out and going down a bad path and most of the time will commit a crime and go to jail/prison. Now this does not happen for every child I know that. But if a child does not have a role model of each sex. Then the wont be able to ask them questions about things. There are questions only men can answer and there are question only woman can answer. And for this reason. I don't think gay marriage or lesbian marriage (Yes I know we are not talking about lesbians) should be allowed. That is my opinion. Also being gay is not natural. God made a man and a women to be the first people on earth. Not a man and a man, Or a woman and a woman. Everyone is born straight but they chose which road they want to go. How I know this is because when you are 5 years old, You don't think about being gay. You start thinking about being gay when you grow up. You are not born gay and for anyone to say that is ignorant.
This is not an argument against gay marriage, but an argument against gays. Furthermore, if sexual orientation is a "choice" as fundamentalists claim, then it follows that heterosexuality is a choice too. Why should one "choice" be favored over another?
Incidentally, a person's religion is certainly a choice, yet we firmly protect that as a person's right.
There is that evidence indicates that sexual orientation is not chosen, studies show numerous biological correlations with sexual orientation, and the APA denounces so-called "therapy" to turn gay people straight, that "ex-gays" keep turning up in gay bars, etc.
The Biblical objection to homosexuality is hypocritical, because those who condemn it do not condemn just as vigorously other prohibited behaviors such as wearing clothing made of two kinds of material (Lev. 19: 19), trimming or shaving sideburns (Lev. 19: 27), getting tattoos (Lev. 19: 28), and charging interest (Deut. 23: 19-20). People who condemn homosexuality do so not because the Bible tells them to, but, ultimately, because they want to. People who condemn others should first examine the morality of their own judgments.
Woke said:Really, I do think gay marriage should be allowed :/, This is my opinion.. And I am not going to change it. IDC What anyone else sais, I do think it sould be allowed. Theres no logical reason why it shouldn't,
Leader said:What? There is no logical reason to deny homosexuals the right to marriage.
Hope said:That's just your opinion homie. People have theirs and your opinion isn't always 100% the correct thing because people can choose whatever they want to choose. You can already clearly read that he won't change his opinion so don't there is no reason to attempt to change it.
Whilst I agree with you on the interpretations of love part, I don't agree with you on the fact that if nature does it, then we should. Several species of animal are known to be cannibalistic and necrophiliac, does that mean we should follow those examples too?Leader said:Homosexuality is actually quite abundant in nature, so it's definitely a natural way of life. Homosexuals, like all humans, deserve real love, not just lip service about love. Our society shouldn't be constrained by narrow interpretations of love. These interpretations only come from one place, religion. There is nothing immoral about homosexuality in the slightest.
Crux said:Whilst I agree with you on the interpretations of love part, I don't agree with you on the fact that if nature does it, then we should. Several species of animal are known to be cannibalistic and necrophiliac, does that mean we should follow those examples too?
I think the best way to combat gay marriage is to force everyone to get a civil partnership. That way there is no perception that marriage is a higher form of love. Instead, people can choose what to call their civil partnership, and religious people can get their marriage blessed by their religion etc.
If we start forcing churches to allow gay marriage, isn't that a form of discrimination against the church? The state and the church should be separated at all costs.
I have absolutely no problem with homosexuality, however I don't think one group should be forced to incorporate another group, especially when said incorporation is directly against their beliefs.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?