It's not a plan its our biological job or function to reproduce. If your going to argue with me that having a child with sperm is natural then I don't know what to say. For one men can not do that and on another its not natural nor normal for females to do that. On the idea of their key option being adoption thats not exactly going with or against your argument. In a way it goes with my argument that their disease provides for population control and helps take those without a parent. And the majority of adopters in the world are not homosexuals, don't know where you got that fact from.
-
Welcome to ForumKorner!
Join today and become a part of the community.
Homosexuality
- Thread starter Optics
- Start date
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Quoting from the link from Hannah.
Scientists in Australia have found a way to fertilise eggs using genetic material from any cell in the body - and not just sperm.
The technique could potentially help infertile couples to have children.
Dr Orly Lacham-Kaplan
Theoretically, it also could mean that lesbian couples could give birth to a baby girl without the need for a father. Women do not carry the genetic information required to make a boy.
Your argument on lesbians now is invalid due to the fact they can reproduce.
Although you're probably going to argue that method isn't natural and we'll just do a loop or two, lol. :wink2:
We're both adamant on our stances, truce? (Unless someone else posts then we'll post like crazy and get them to think omg what have I done, haha)
wale said:
And when I said they're the highest adopting people that includes # of children and doesn't includes couples that can have babies. That statistic only applies in some states that even allow gay couples to adopt.. Adoption would go up if it was allowed everywhere.
Now your going into a world created by us. Go look at a less complex organism and see if they could think that.
wale said:
Lol. (Haven't got much more of a reply to be honest)
Back to my earlier thing I had to leave for school so I had to write that rather quickly. Now Minx supported my argument by bringing up the fertilization without sperm. "For one men can not do that and on another its not natural nor normal for females to do that". Its clearly not natural for women to reproduce without a man. This debate isn't going anywhere so I'll just end it by bringing up once again homosexuality is an incurable disease which serves functions.
Having a disease isn't a choice therefore your going with my argument. As I said its a clear abnormality to our biological functions to be homosexual. Therefore they do have a disease.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disease
a condition of the living animal or plant body or of one of its parts that impairs normal functioning and is typically manifested by distinguishing signs and symptoms.
If your going to argue that people choose to be homosexuals then your simply wrong, homosexuals themselves say they were born or are that way. If it was a manner of choice they would change themselves.
a condition of the living animal or plant body or of one of its parts that impairs normal functioning and is typically manifested by distinguishing signs and symptoms.
If your going to argue that people choose to be homosexuals then your simply wrong, homosexuals themselves say they were born or are that way. If it was a manner of choice they would change themselves.
wale said:
Yes ^ you worded my opinion in the simplest way.
We both have different opinions because I assume we're from different religions. > We all have a mind to make our choices in life, some people make good ones others make bad ones. I have been taught to believe homosexuality is bad which it is because a man + a man or a woman + a woman cannot reproduce other lifeforms which was the intention of God when creating human beings. People who are homosexual chose it.
I'm more of a deist if anything so my religion doesn't affect my thoughts towards homosexuality. I don't think those people choose, I think its a disease that causes them to be that way. Some say its based on spinal alignment and others that it is in the mind.
People who say they were "born that way" or "I didn't choose to be homosexual" are just completely wrong.
Their lifestyle and their way of thinking due to their experience of life, makes them choose their sexuality as such. You can't be born homosexual as you are always born with no knowledge of anything. You have your opinions and values because of the way you have grown up, not because you have been forced to choose.
Their lifestyle and their way of thinking due to their experience of life, makes them choose their sexuality as such. You can't be born homosexual as you are always born with no knowledge of anything. You have your opinions and values because of the way you have grown up, not because you have been forced to choose.
@"Crysis" some say it is based on spinal alignment. I don't think its a trait someone would want.
Neither of us can know since we're not homosexual nor have extensive knowledge. Lets just agree to disagree.
Optics said:
I hope you're aware that what you're asking of us is an opinion. And an opinion is merely a perspective. I can't be debated. If someone tells you "I have no problem with homosexuals', you can't sit there trying to debate that.
This is a good discussion topic but it isn't something that can be debated, that's why I strongly think it should be in the lobby.
Next time you are anyone else is thinking of posting a debate topic, formulate a question beforehand, and then read it back to yourself while asking; can this be argued with reason?
Featured
Share this page
