I challenge: 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Danger Close · May 20, 2011

Jonathan said:
Maybe the part where it uses facts? Hmm, that's funny, I'm sure facts are true.
Prove it then.

No problamo, doing so now.

Jonathan said:
Documentaries can be played in a movie theater dumb-ass.

If it was REALLY debunking the president and the government, they would have taken it out before it was even released.

Jonathan said:
A media monkey, by the way the Government feed the media (newspapers, tv channels) crap and then they emit it to you, and you believe it... at least this documentary was by an individual source, not a Government representative.

Oh yes, I have the news ALWAYS on in my room. I get my source of information from www.documentingreality.com, 'cause I feel it's not censored.

Also, Michael Moore is biased on his political views. If someone is going to make a movie like that, expect it to be EXTREMELY left winged, and very dishonest.

Jonathan said:
The secret service couldn't block it, because one, if they did, it proves it's true. And two, they haven't released any sensitive information that could be used against the country in anyway.

There you go tiger, if they did that; Then my views would change as-well. But it didn't :\

Never read the wiki-leaks? Damn, that's some information right there.

Jonathan said:
Please learn facts before you come here and post shit.

Case closed.

What facts? You posted a movie that's dishonest and unintelligent, would you like me to do the same?

Star Wars for example is true, it could've happened million years ago. Debunk that.

Blastionx7 · May 22, 2011

But you're biased too though. That "******" comment you made just proves it. And to use your own words against you... "It can't be hypocritical to be valid." So based on what you say... your thoughts, comments, and opinions hold no validity whatsoever; seeing as though you are a hypocritical, close-minded and very ignorant individual. I'll pray for you.

Danger Close · May 22, 2011

But you're biased too though. That "******" comment you made just proves it.

Of-course I'm biased on the subject, because I did actually do some research. It was biased to start with, I mean I did say, "I don't think it's an inside job".

Seeing that I'm so closed-minded, and that I've done my own research to back myself up, all the claims you have made are throughout text, and ignorance throughout your feeble mind. I congratulate you for at-least trying, but next time don't post if you cannot perceive.

Thanks.

Relapse · May 22, 2011

@Hannah,

I don't know if the movie was true, I never even saw it. But if the government had taken it out of theaters because it was true, than every1 would know for a fact it was true. Obviously they wouldn't take it out if it was false. So they could be just letting it pass so every1 assumes it's false.

Danger Close · May 22, 2011

Relapse said:
@Hannah,

I don't know if the movie was true, I never even saw it. But if the government had taken it out of theaters because it was true, than every1 would know for a fact it was true. Obviously they wouldn't take it out if it was false. So they could be just letting it pass so every1 assumes it's false.

I watched it when I was around 14-15? Maybe 16? I don't really remember. How would they know it was true? Who says that they could take it out when it was even put into theaters? It could've been way before, or during the shooting of it. All in all, if you studied politics, and you get on the internet sometimes, you see there are always ads about a president doing something. Usually that statement is false, and this movie is no different. It's just another way of mudslinging.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudslinging

Relapse · May 22, 2011

Ya ik what mudslinging is, and It's kinda hard to follow your post when you use so many pronouns

Danger Close · May 22, 2011

Relapse said:
Ya ik what mudslinging is, and It's kinda hard to follow your post when you use so many pronouns

Well, replace it with the obvious.

Blastionx7 · May 22, 2011

You used absolutely NO facts in our argument. In fact, you stopped replying because you were definitely proven wrong. Once again, just because you say something does not make it true. But as they say, ignorance is bliss. You must be having one hell of a time.

Danger Close · May 23, 2011

Blastionx7 said:
You used absolutely NO facts in our argument. In fact, you stopped replying because you were definitely proven wrong. Once again, just because you say something does not make it true. But as they say, ignorance is bliss. You must be having one hell of a time.

All there was in my argument was me proving my beliefs. That's about it, so there really can't be proof of that. Ignorance is bliss indeed, but to put it all on me is just as ignorant as you're presenting it.

Zach_Trash · Aug 4, 2011

Please disprove and debunk this.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rxi793UTHg[/youtube]

Danger Close · Aug 4, 2011

Zach said:
Please disprove and debunk this.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rxi793UTHg[/youtube]

Summarize it please.

I'm not sitting through a video.

Zach_Trash · Aug 5, 2011

Danger Close said:
Zach said:

Please disprove and debunk this.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rxi793UTHg[/youtube]

Click to expand...

Summarize it please.

I'm not sitting through a video.

It is 8 mins long, it is very interesting and has very vaulable proof. If you cannot spend 8 mins to see the other parties defense then you've already admitted defeat.

Danger Close · Aug 5, 2011

From 0:00 - 0:50.

It's different from an actual fire, and an airplane smacking right into a building at 600MPH.

Then he suggest that the WTC is all-around invincible. No buddy, with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel,
and magnesium on the planes wings that's able to burn at about 5,000 degrees fahrenheit. It'll
definitely either melt or weaken steel, and cause it to the collapse. The domino effect plays a
very important role.

Lol, a cruise missile hitting the pentagon? LOL!

The plane can melt itself when in tight places as the pentagon, and as I said before the wings
on those planes are made of magnesium, and it can reach up to 5,000+ degrees fahrenheit, which is
able to melt!

Now, if you want to debate.

Use your own criteria, and quit posting me your only source of information >>>YouTube<<<.

Zach_Trash · Aug 5, 2011

Danger Close said:
From 0:00 - 0:50.

It's different from an actual fire, and an airplane smacking right into a building at 600MPH.

Then he suggest that the WTC is all-around invincible. No buddy, with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel,
and magnesium on the planes wings that's able to burn at about 5,000 degrees fahrenheit. It'll
definitely either melt or weaken steel, and cause it to the collapse. The domino effect plays a
very important role.

Lol, a cruise missile hitting the pentagon? LOL!

The plane can melt itself when in tight places as the pentagon, and as I said before the wings
on those planes are made of magnesium, and it can reach up to 5,000+ degrees fahrenheit, which is
able to melt!

Now, if you want to debate.

Use your own criteria, and quit posting me your only source of information >>>YouTube<<<.

It is scientifically impossible for all the 757 to "vaporize" in the pentagon. Also notice how coincidentally no one in the pentagon was hurt. Also note how the FBI showed up to the hotel that caught it all on cam and took the cams away and told the people not to say what they saw. Which is also proven.

Danger Close · Aug 5, 2011

Zach said:
Danger Close said:

From 0:00 - 0:50.

It's different from an actual fire, and an airplane smacking right into a building at 600MPH.

Then he suggest that the WTC is all-around invincible. No buddy, with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel,
and magnesium on the planes wings that's able to burn at about 5,000 degrees fahrenheit. It'll
definitely either melt or weaken steel, and cause it to the collapse. The domino effect plays a
very important role.

Lol, a cruise missile hitting the pentagon? LOL!

The plane can melt itself when in tight places as the pentagon, and as I said before the wings
on those planes are made of magnesium, and it can reach up to 5,000+ degrees fahrenheit, which is
able to melt!

Now, if you want to debate.

Use your own criteria, and quit posting me your only source of information >>>YouTube<<<.

Click to expand...

It is scientifically impossible for all the 757 to "vaporize" in the pentagon. Also notice how coincidentally no one in the pentagon was hurt. Also note how the FBI showed up to the hotel that caught it all on cam and took the cams away and told the people not to say what they saw. Which is also proven.

Not at all. It's pretty obvious that the plane was hitting the Pentagon nose first, and you're really underestimating Jet fuel.

Also, people did die at the pentagon.

http://www.wpri.com/dpps/news/us_news/Top-military-officer-honors-9-11-Pentagon-victims-_3578211

Zach_Trash · Aug 5, 2011

If you watched the video and completely understood it, you would understand it would be completely impossible for all of those parts to vaporize.

Also, how did the entire 757 vaporize but the seats, made of kusion, not? I mean I would think those would be easily vaporized.

Danger Close · Aug 5, 2011

Zach said:
If you watched the video and completely understood it, you would understand it would be completely impossible for all of those parts to vaporize.

Also, how did the entire 757 vaporize but the seats, made of kusion, not? I mean I would think those would be easily vaporized.

They didn't VAPORIZE, matter cannot be destroyed. It's just that the plane had melted.

Did you ever learn what a plane is made out of?

Saturn_mybb_import14249 · Aug 7, 2011

Inside job. The news said the second tower fell before it even did. The plane parts were not found, but the passports of the terrorists were found in the debris? Come on. Now the super congress is here, there taking our guns. The TSA is raping people at airports. WAKE UP PEOPLE.

Danger Close · Aug 7, 2011

Saturn said:
Inside job. The news said the second tower fell before it even did. The plane parts were not found, but the passports of the terrorists were found in the debris? Come on. Now the super congress is here, there taking our guns. The TSA is raping people at airports. WAKE UP PEOPLE.

I agree that some stuff is being taken from us. But, for you to sit there and tell me that those buildings came down with explosives is as stupid as sticking a firecracker in your ass 'cause you have a hemorrhoid.

Fusion · Aug 7, 2011

Some think the US Government did it as part of the illuminati. In videos it does look like explosives go off before plane impact.
Also apparently there were a curtain amount of windows smashed etc. Which match up to the Illuminati's numerical obsession.
Anyway, no one will ever know who controlled it.

But as Zach said; It is scientifically impossible for all the 757 to "vaporize" in the pentagon. Also notice how coincidentally no one in the pentagon was hurt. Also note how the FBI showed up to the hotel that caught it all on cam and took the cams away and told the people not to say what they saw. Which is also proven.

Makes it suspicious that the US Government was involved.

I challenge: 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Onyx user!

Member

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Member

Onyx user!

Member

Onyx user!

Member

Onyx user!

Member

Onyx user!

Member

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency