Fuck god, SATAN ALL DAY! *Looks at my Post count, realizes I'm joking*Cannibаl said:I think this question belongs in the category of things you don't want to know the truth about. I'm trying to look at this from a religious person's standpoint, but I can't find the reason why they would believe in him in the first place.
I'm starting to believe that perhaps religion or the concept of a god was originally created for the purpose to keep a society civilized and everyone fell for it? And the original creator never told anyone it was all fake or perhaps no one believed him once he told everyone it was fake. I just don't see it. I want to be enlightened but this whole thing is spurious. Maybe the concept of a deity was created by some lunatic who thought he was superhuman, and got a bunch of more maniacs to join his cult and worship him or something. I don't know, I'm just making possible theories on how the concept of a God was made.
Cannibаl said:Science refutes his existence.
The unmoved mover argument asserts that, from our experience of motion in the universe (motion being the transition from potentiality to actuality) we can see that there must have been an initial mover. Aquinas argued that whatever is in motion must be put in motion by another thing, so there must be an unmoved mover.
Aquinas' argument from first cause started with the premise that it is impossible for a being to cause itself (because it would have to exist before it caused itself) and that it is impossible for there to be an infinite chain of causes, which would result in infinite regress. Therefore, there must be a first cause, itself uncaused.
The argument from necessary being asserts that all beings are contingent, meaning that it is possible for them not to exist. Aquinas argued that if everything can possibly not exist, there must have been a time when nothing existed; as things exist now, there must exist a being with necessary existence, regarded as God.
Flippy said:Personally I don't believe in god, there's no proof. If they say "Who made the Earth?" and they say "God" and then I would say "Who made god?"
Paul H. said:Science cannot refute God's existence. God could be a God who just minds his own business and doesn't give a damn about the world. I don't believe that is the case however.
Philosophers have thought about God through the ages and they always come up by reason that Gods exists. Let's take Thomas Aquinas:
Also.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_Lanciano
That's a scientifically proven living piece of human flesh, a Catholic Eucharistic miracle. be skeptical about the stigmata and other miracles, but you can't explain that one.
Q.E.D.
A few notes:
A Catholic priest came up with the idea of the Big Bang Theory. Religion and science are not opposites.
If you don't believe in God, what is there to live for? There's no ultimate goal, no afterlife.
Paul H. said:The kicker is it's living flesh, not dead iirc. On mobile now or is give a longer reply.
Shot said:You're either atheist or religious and believe in God?
hell no, why can't someone go on with life without religion?
jessh! and i'm pretty sure atheism is a religion, just sayin'.
Cole said:Obviously there isn't really any solid physical proof, but if you believe, and devote yourself to the religion, you will indeed see that God, is very much, indeed, REAL.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?