Good luck with sales. I'm not a fan of manual labor or passing the third grade. So, the forum life chose me.Shift said:True, plus there are other things you can be doing like getting a job or educating yourself.
Sector said:Good luck with sales. I'm not a fan of manual labor or passing the third grade. So, the forum life chose me.
I'm a business major, I understand economics, but there's more to it in this case and several ways to at least slightly increase the value, and I don't believe buying a group and selling it almost instantly is one of them. This isn't about how many groups there are necessarily because there's nothing we can do about that, it's about what we can do and have control over. And yeah lol, don't do it again.Shift said:>I'm not defending shitty group market
>Surplus>demand
Simple economics bud
#tbt remember when I filled up the Mod CP with people reporting my posts ? : )
Stranger danger and that ball is life.Shift said:What is a forum going to contribute to your life when you are older ?
Philly is the only one who can really make a change.Greed said:I'm a business major, I understand economics, but there's more to it in this case and several ways to at least slightly increase the value, and I don't believe buying a group and selling it almost instantly as one of them. This isn't about how many groups there are necessarily because there's nothing we can do about that, it's about what we can do and have control over. And yeah lol, don't do it again.
Isn't that the whole point of Facebook and TwitterSector said:Stranger danger and that ball is life.
@greed they don't realize that within the last 2 weeks, Philly has deleted 2 groups so far and stopped selling newly created groups. This will increase the price at a really small level, but it still benefits the group market for owners. They rather bitch and moan in opposed to look at the positives.Sector said:Stranger danger and that ball is life.
Shift said:What is a forum going to contribute to your life when you are older ?
No matter how much I troll and joke around, I hate seeing the ignorance of people on subjects that actually make a difference.Sector said:FINALLY, the logical members come to join the discussion.
Thank you, @"Greed", @"Shift" and @"Jamil".
Jamil said:No matter how much I troll and joke around, I hate seeing the ignorance of people on subjects that actually make a difference.
Fuck you, you know that I hate that onyx shit. Also, I have been banned 4 times with a total of 8 months and a multi.Shift said:I just troll and everybody here knows that.
I have 7 bans to prove it ; (
But I actually know what I'm talking about
btw do you notice I haven't fixed the spelling error in my sig lol
That would be why this is just a rant and not an actual attempt for change.Monster said:@sector regardless of which way you want to see this, the increase of one product will decrease the value, some users no longer have a reason to keep they're groups, yes low other users to purchase said groups and then they can "attempt" to steadily increase the value of groups, I've owned three groups here longer then any 2014, the only other people who've kept they're groups longer is/was Immortals/Mob as far as I know. You want to rant about people selling groups fair is fair, but regardless of your rant they'll continue to do as they please.
Ownership requirements would not be able to be implemented. We'd have to strip current owners of his/her group(s).. it's not possible. It'd be nice if it were.Deviate said:What do you guys think about having requirements to own groups and awards?
No.Deviate said:What do you guys think about having requirements to own groups and awards?
cas said:Well you're technically a scammer so your rant is invalid, see ya.
The persistence is strong. Try again next year, babe. BE MAD.cas said:Well you're technically a scammer so your rant is invalid, see ya.