NEW SUGGESTIONS, FK READ THIS

[Hope]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

That should be the least of your worries.

No it is of my worries because I am about half way through on recorded vouches.

 

[Philly]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

No it is of my worries because I am about half way through on recorded vouches.

I am just saying, you shouldn't worry about it. Just get to 100, and we will go from there.

 

[Hope]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

I am just saying, you shouldn't worry about it. Just get to 100, and we will go from there.

Okay, another question. Can I have people that I have done multiple MM's vouch again even though it was in the past or not.

 

[Philly]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

Okay, another question. Can I have people that I have done multiple MM's vouch again even though it was in the past or not.

They either need to vouch right after the deal, or not vouch at all.

 

[Shift]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

They either need to vouch right after the deal, or not vouch at all.

Philly are we allowed to leak e-books from other forums ?

 

[Philly]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

Philly are we allowed to leak e-books from other forums ?

No that isn't really cool man.

 

[Hope]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

No that isn't really cool man.

Just wondering, would I get suggested award for the this thread? If not it's totally chill. I have another suggestion as well. Should the PM time be lessened by about 10 seconds. I always find myself midway through a MM where I tell the people to PM me and right as I send the 2nd message to te second person I have to wait 15 seconds. This can get extremely annoying. Please fix this.

 

[Sexy]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

I agree with number 6 and all of the other ones basically, but an SE subforum would be very nice to have

 

[Attract]

RE: Suggestions FK READ THIS

Keep up the good suggestions man. I'm totally digging them.

 

[Hope]

RE: NEW SUGGESTION, FK READ THIS

I just made an amazing suggestion that I personally hope is implemented.

To view it, just look at the top suggestion that says new suggestion.

 

[Poe]

RE: NEW SUGGESTION, FK READ THIS

I just made an amazing suggestion that I personally hope is implemented.

To view it, just look at the top suggestion that says new suggestion.

Why don't you just make a new thread? This will probably be confusing to people..

 

[Hope]

RE: NEW SUGGESTION, FK READ THIS

Why don't you just make a new thread? This will probably be confusing to people..

Will create a new thread right now

 

[Hope]

RE: NEW SUGGESTION, FK READ THIS

@Philly I just updated the thread and would love to know what everyone thinks about these.

 

[Nevermind]

I still don't agree with the word filters, but I guess it's up to @"Philly". Porn is not necessary. There are plenty of websites I can go if I want to see porn. Plus, I use FK in school and wouldn't want to accidentally open up something that my teacher might see. The "Trusted" group is a great idea. Finally, I think the jacking methods/crackers would help the forum a lot.

 

[Hope]

I still don't agree with the word filters, but I guess it's up to @"Philly". Porn is not necessary. There are plenty of websites I can go if I want to see porn. Plus, I use FK in school and wouldn't want to accidentally open up something that my teacher might see. The "Trusted" group is a great idea. Finally, I think the jacking methods/crackers would help the forum a lot.

I think if porn was to be added; it would have to have a click to show button. Then no one would be worried about running into unless you wanted to see it all the time. @Philly tell me what you think of the Trusted Group? I really think that this would be a great idea for the site.

 

[Solar]

1.) I completely agree with this suggestion. I constantly find myself clicking on the warning level percentage of other members to no avail. This would serve as a great help to one who is considering dealing with another member who has obtained a notable warning level.

2.) Personally, I don't feel that this is completely necessary. However, if other members see this as being a possible benefit, then I am all for it.

3.) I do agree that the double-rep problem should be fixed, but don't necessarily think that disabling/limiting rep for a certain day would benefit anyone.

4.) I completely agree with @Leader on this one. I too use FK while I am at school, and I would not enjoy turning around and seeing a teacher looking over my shoulder with porn accidentally popping up on my screen. I also feel that this would only work to make the site more 'low-quality' in a certain sense, as I know that I wouldn't think too greatly of any 'Gaming' forum if I saw porn on the site within the first 5 minutes of joining.

5.) I do not agree with this suggestion. I do understand the one and only rule that the Spamming & Trolling Section has, but I don't think it's necessary for any menber to throw around swear words, racial slurs, etc. at another member. If you take a look, you can see that the Spamming & Trolling Section already has enough vulgar content in it now, if you ask me.

6.) I agree with this suggestion 100%; in every aspect. Not much to say about this one.

7.) While I certainly do agree with this, I can see why other members would be concerned about their own personal items being targeted. Though, if that can somehow get sorted out, then I'm all for it.

 

[Hope]

1.) I completely agree with this suggestion. I constantly find myself clicking on the warning level percentage of other members to no avail. This would serve as a great help to one who is considering dealing with another member who has obtained a notable warning level.

2.) Personally, I don't feel that this is completely necessary. However, if other members see this as being a possible benefit, then I am all for it.

3.) I do agree that the double-rep problem should be fixed, but don't necessarily think that disabling/limiting rep for a certain day would benefit anyone.

4.) I completely agree with @Leader on this one. I too use FK while I am at school, and I would not enjoy turning around and seeing a teacher looking over my shoulder with porn accidentally popping up on my screen. I also feel that this would only work to make the site more 'low-quality' in a certain sense, as I know that I wouldn't think too greatly of any 'Gaming' forum if I saw porn on the site within the first 5 minutes of joining.

5.) I do not agree with this suggestion. I do understand the one and only rule that the Spamming & Trolling Section has, but I don't think it's necessary for any menber to throw around swear words, racial slurs, etc. at another member. If you take a look, you can see that the Spamming & Trolling Section already has enough vulgar content in it now, if you ask me.

6.) I agree with this suggestion 100%; in every aspect. Not much to say about this one.

7.) While I certainly do agree with this, I can see why other members would be concerned about their own personal items being targeted. Though, if that can somehow get sorted out, then I'm all for it.

Thank you for thinking about all the suggestions. For the porn one. I would think if it was to be allowed; you would have to put it as a post where you have to click to see it so you wouldn't have to worry about that at school. For the spamming and trolling. I think it's fine because it's spamming and vulgar is fine in that section because that is where all the LQ people post. I just feel like we are limited when we try to post some words and I don't like it. For the double rep; it shows a false rep and yaddayadda...

 

[Michael]

What about a redirected link to FK where there are no sigs or photos to be shown, like a nsfw.forumkorner.com - Basically incase you don't want people seeing your shit or seeing the thousand members who now have ass gifs (stole from me obv)

 

[Glubz]

These are great improvements/suggestions that need to be done.

 

[Greed]

If porn was added then I believe we should do what @Michael suggested above, or have a private sub-forum that is only able to be seen and access by Power members and above.