Philly said:That should be the least of your worries.
Hope said:No it is of my worries because I am about half way through on recorded vouches.
Philly said:I am just saying, you shouldn't worry about it. Just get to 100, and we will go from there.
Hope said:Okay, another question. Can I have people that I have done multiple MM's vouch again even though it was in the past or not.
Philly are we allowed to leak e-books from other forums ?Philly said:They either need to vouch right after the deal, or not vouch at all.
Shift said:Philly are we allowed to leak e-books from other forums ?
Philly said:No that isn't really cool man.
Hope said:I just made an amazing suggestion that I personally hope is implemented.
To view it, just look at the top suggestion that says new suggestion.
Poe said:Why don't you just make a new thread? This will probably be confusing to people..
Leader said:I still don't agree with the word filters, but I guess it's up to @"Philly". Porn is not necessary. There are plenty of websites I can go if I want to see porn. Plus, I use FK in school and wouldn't want to accidentally open up something that my teacher might see. The "Trusted" group is a great idea. Finally, I think the jacking methods/crackers would help the forum a lot.
Solar said:1.) I completely agree with this suggestion. I constantly find myself clicking on the warning level percentage of other members to no avail. This would serve as a great help to one who is considering dealing with another member who has obtained a notable warning level.
2.) Personally, I don't feel that this is completely necessary. However, if other members see this as being a possible benefit, then I am all for it.
3.) I do agree that the double-rep problem should be fixed, but don't necessarily think that disabling/limiting rep for a certain day would benefit anyone.
4.) I completely agree with @Leader on this one. I too use FK while I am at school, and I would not enjoy turning around and seeing a teacher looking over my shoulder with porn accidentally popping up on my screen. I also feel that this would only work to make the site more 'low-quality' in a certain sense, as I know that I wouldn't think too greatly of any 'Gaming' forum if I saw porn on the site within the first 5 minutes of joining.
5.) I do not agree with this suggestion. I do understand the one and only rule that the Spamming & Trolling Section has, but I don't think it's necessary for any menber to throw around swear words, racial slurs, etc. at another member. If you take a look, you can see that the Spamming & Trolling Section already has enough vulgar content in it now, if you ask me.
6.) I agree with this suggestion 100%; in every aspect. Not much to say about this one.
7.) While I certainly do agree with this, I can see why other members would be concerned about their own personal items being targeted. Though, if that can somehow get sorted out, then I'm all for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?